Whether we need to move Clarkson or not has nothing to do with Zubac. He won't be the asking price nor will a trade hinge on him.
Your premise is based on hyperbole, not evidence or fact. We don't need to move Zubac, even if it's likely we will at some point. We also don't NEED filler to move Clarkson. Neither of these are a "thing". Repeating it won't change that.
Never said moving Clarkson had anything to do with Zubac, nor did i say we needed to move Zubac.
Just said what i thought should happen. Clarkson's value isn't as high as most Laker fans think. I mean, if you can sign guys like Patty Mills, Roberson, Dion Waiters, Collison etc. to less money, i dont think teams are all that excited about taking on Clarkson - much less help the Lakers create cap space for Lebron or George.
Theoretically we dont NEED to do anything because it is possible to get to two max slots by simply stretching Clarkson AND Deng and waive Randle AND Nance, but that's about the worst possible way to go about things. By shedding Clarkson early, we can get to 50M in cap space and keep both Deng and Randle, 60M if we stretch Deng and keep Randle and 72M if we stretch Deng and waive (or trade) Randle. IMO that would be the smartest thing to do.