What's wrong with fans lamenting about a former Laker whom they believe was involved in an extremely controversial trade?
While we won't know whether the trade was truly a good or bad one until a couple years down the road, what crime is there in discussing potential avenues or outcomes that could have been?
People on this forum still discuss the CP3 deal despite it happening ages ago and the guy never even donning a Laker uniform, they still bring up the terrible Nash trade as well as other previous deals or fallouts that have haunted this franchise, so what's wrong with discussing Russell?
Don't go playing the whole, "I'm a fan of what's in front of the jersey, not what's on the back" as if the posters on this forum whom are Russell supporters were solely Laker fans because of him. Simply on the top of my head, Majesty, Jody Smokes, Clutch Factor, JGuez, Basketball IQ, Ventiquattro, bigfetz, lakersfan98, Massacre and likely many more guys whom were against the Russell trade and are still voicing their discomfort with the transaction are some of this forums greatest contributors and dedicated members long before we even acquired Russell...
If you prefer not talking and hearing about Russell, then whenever you see someone talking about him, use your right hand (left, if you're left handed), move it over to your mouse, place your finger (index finger generally) onto the scroll wheel, and simply utilize a bit of ATP to scroll down or completely click a different thread.
If those instructions were to difficult to comprehend, then in true GCMD fashion, here's a Youtube Highlight Video...
Edited by LakeShow1o1, July 11, 2017 - 01:07 AM.