Jump to content


Photo

Lakers should be going after brook lopez


  • Please log in to reply
6 replies to this topic

#1 kingkobe

kingkobe

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 421 posts
  • Name:ry
  • Fan Since:1995
  • Fav. Laker:luke walton

Posted June 29, 2015 - 08:03 AM

Lakers r talking about love Aldridge but Randle is gonna be a star Aldridge and love don't fit as nicely as an elite center. Then you have boogie we can't give up all r young assets for him, Marc gasol doesn't want to be a laker, deandre is unlikely. That's why I think we should pursue Brook Lopez he's a cali kid we might get him for 5 million less when healthy on BK this kid was great. I mean there r plenty of guys with injury history tht r worth signing. Since this guys been in the league he's averages 18 ppg 7 rebounds every year except his rookie year. Brook put the nets on his back this year when healthy he can be a top 5 center and we can keep all r assets while bringing in an elite scorer post player.

We can't get Jimmy butler if only he was unrestricted we have to bring in a wing carrol would be a good first option if we can afford it tobias harris is another option. I also think we can try to trade Nick young for a guy like Wilson Chandler.

Pg 3angelo russel
sg Kobe Clarkson playing a lot of minutes to keep kobe healthy
Sf carrol if he's to expensive Wilson Chandler if not Danny green if not him Crowder if Boston picks him no up aminu a nice defensive fit
pf randle
C brook lopez

Whoever we sign at sf will be r defensive presence we need brook lopez will put up 20 and 10 randle will be up and down but I see a better Lamar Odom in him 3angelo will be the best rookie in the league clarkson will be up for 6th man of the year and Kobe will be Kobe Lopez will give us a big enough signing to intrigue future free agents with top 6 center and with him we have a chance to get Kobe into one more playoff series.

I want love Aldridge cousins butler more but I don't think we can get any of those guys now we need to go after Lopez the future is now. I know he will get hated on here but the kid fits on the Lakers

#2 JGuez

JGuez

    All-Star

  • Member
  • 5,650 posts

Posted June 29, 2015 - 08:18 AM

I disagree. Lopez is not good at defense and is incredibly injury prone.



#3 kingkobe

kingkobe

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 421 posts
  • Name:ry
  • Fan Since:1995
  • Fav. Laker:luke walton

Posted June 29, 2015 - 08:32 AM

Love is not good at defense and is injury prone to Aldridge would get eaten up at center on d

#4 Wilt Chamberneezy

Wilt Chamberneezy

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 772 posts
  • Fan Since:1998
  • Fav. Laker:Shaq, Kobe, Fisher,Fox, Horry

Posted June 29, 2015 - 11:56 AM

If we get Aldridge, I think we should target Robin Lopez since they played together. Have Randle come off the bench. Nance will probably be our starting SF. I like Brook Lopez, but I prefer Aldridge.



#5 Psychobroker

Psychobroker

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 128 posts
  • Fav. Laker:BIG GAME James Worthy!

Posted June 30, 2015 - 12:04 AM

I disagree. Lopez is not good at defense and is incredibly injury prone.

 

And slooooowwww...  no thanks.  I'd rather have Chandler.



#6 kingkobe

kingkobe

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 421 posts
  • Name:ry
  • Fan Since:1995
  • Fav. Laker:luke walton

Posted June 30, 2015 - 06:55 AM

If we get Aldridge, I think we should target Robin Lopez since they played together. Have Randle come off the bench. Nance will probably be our starting SF. I like Brook Lopez, but I prefer Aldridge.


Do u think aldridge would wanna come to la to play with the same center though?

#7 kingkobe

kingkobe

    Rookie

  • Member
  • 421 posts
  • Name:ry
  • Fan Since:1995
  • Fav. Laker:luke walton

Posted June 30, 2015 - 06:55 AM

If we get Aldridge, I think we should target Robin Lopez since they played together. Have Randle come off the bench. Nance will probably be our starting SF. I like Brook Lopez, but I prefer Aldridge.


Do u think aldridge would wanna come to la to play with the same center though?




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users