Jump to content




Photo

Lakers Record to the All-Star Break?


  • Please log in to reply
58 replies to this topic

#21 GinzyVee

GinzyVee

    Clutch

  • 1,969 posts
  • Joined: Sep 17, 2008
  • Location:Somewhere, PA
  • Fan Since:1991
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted January 09, 2009 - 05:11 PM

18-0

Why cant we? The Celtics did 19......plus we cant lose to Cleveland cause I got a friend who will shut me down lol

#22 kobynum

kobynum

    Panic eliminator

  • 10,358 posts
  • Joined: Oct 19, 2008
  • Name:LA Pharaoh
  • Fan Since:In Los Angeles, LA fandom is a birthrite
  • Fav. Laker:Mamba and Magic

Posted January 09, 2009 - 05:18 PM

My Prediction
01/09/09 Fri- Indiana- W
01/11/09 Sun- Miami- W
01/13/09 Tue- @ Houston- L
01/14/09 Wed- @ San Antonio-W
01/16/09 Fri- Orlando-W
01/19/09 Mon- Cleveland- W
01/21/09 Wed- @ L.A. Clippers-W
01/22/09 Thu- Washington- W
01/25/09 Sun- San Antonio- L
01/27/09 Tue- Charlotte- W
01/30/09 Fri- @ Minnesota- W
01/31/09 Sat- @ Memphis-W
02/02/09 Mon- @ New York-W
02/04/09 Wed- @ Toronto-W
02/05/09 Thu- @ Boston- L
02/08/09 Sun- @ Cleveland- W
02/10/09 Tue- Oklahoma City- W
02/11/09 Wed- @ Utah-W
Total 18 Games, Prediction: 15 wins-3 losses....

Fixed
Again - this team, as currently constructed won't make it out of the second round of the playoffs, let alone the West or win the Finals.---fido on 2011 Lakers

#23 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 14, 2009 - 09:55 PM

I knew it, I knew it.

#24 L.A.K.E.R

L.A.K.E.R

    Gomu Gomu

  • 14,795 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Location:California
  • Name:Shamim
  • Fan Since:2000
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted January 14, 2009 - 10:00 PM

I knew it, I knew it.


Damn you! :rant:

#25 Aceis²FresH

Aceis²FresH

    ║│ █│║ ▌║│█║▌║▌║

  • 2,701 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Location:└A
  • Fav. Laker:#32.

Posted January 14, 2009 - 10:02 PM

Base is Nostradamus.

#26 LALDynasty

LALDynasty

    Kobe Bryant 2010 Finals MVP

  • 3,797 posts
  • Joined: Oct 02, 2008
  • Location:Ontario,California
  • Fan Since:1991
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted January 14, 2009 - 10:48 PM

Base is Nostradamus.


Posted Image

16 TIME NBA WORLD CHAMPIONS!

Thanks TheBigFish for this great sig

#27 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:35 PM

Man, am I good or what?

#28 Aceis²FresH

Aceis²FresH

    ║│ █│║ ▌║│█║▌║▌║

  • 2,701 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Location:└A
  • Fav. Laker:#32.

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:36 PM

Next game looks promising.

#29 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:37 PM

Next game looks promising.

:lol: :bow:

#30 Beethovenite

Beethovenite

    Veteran

  • 785 posts
  • Joined: Sep 08, 2008
  • Location:Southern California
  • Fan Since:1994
  • Fav. Laker:Chick Hearn

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:39 PM

:lol: :bow:


Base, can you take me to the future too next time you go back???

#31 ファイナルファンタジ

ファイナルファンタジ

    Pump Up The Fruit

  • 12,134 posts
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2008
  • Location:San Daygo
  • Name:Jerry
  • Fan Since:Forever
  • Fav. Laker:コービーブライアント

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:43 PM

This thread is a curse. You should have put 18-0. :angry:

Posted Image
Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.


#32 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 16, 2009 - 10:56 PM

Base, can you take me to the future too next time you go back???

That was my first time ever going, I got a machine off of Craigslist.

Edited by Base, January 16, 2009 - 10:57 PM.


#33 lakerlove1989

lakerlove1989

    Proud TLN Member Since Dec 26, 08

  • 389 posts
  • Joined: Dec 26, 2008
  • Location:Moreno Valley, Ca
  • Name:Khachik
  • Fan Since:1995
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe "Bean Black Mamba" Bryant

Posted January 16, 2009 - 11:08 PM

so far you've been money
<div align='center'><img src="http://i41.tinypic.c...om/111rn61.jpg" border="0" class="linked-sig-image" /></div>

#34 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 17, 2009 - 12:10 AM

so far you've been money

I am always money, Nostradamus is never wrong.

#35 last stand 2.0

last stand 2.0

    Legend

  • 19,099 posts
  • Joined: Jul 29, 2008
  • Location:LA

Posted January 17, 2009 - 12:12 AM

^ well then good luck 2012
Posted Image

#36 ファイナルファンタジ

ファイナルファンタジ

    Pump Up The Fruit

  • 12,134 posts
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2008
  • Location:San Daygo
  • Name:Jerry
  • Fan Since:Forever
  • Fav. Laker:コービーブライアント

Posted January 17, 2009 - 12:14 AM

You were wrong about iCarly.

Posted Image
Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.


#37 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 17, 2009 - 12:27 AM

You were wrong about iCarly.

Sorry, iCarly is a "runningoutofideas" show. Proof that Hannah Montana is better than icarly? [list]
Miley Cyrus net 1 BILLION dollars http://www.babble.co...on-dollars.aspx [list]
icarly girls net worth: $1606 (don't know if that is accurate). She has been around longer than Miley too, with Drake and Josh, so she loses, therefore, iCarly loses, to add on she was in school of rock.....

Edited by Base, January 17, 2009 - 12:34 AM.


#38 ファイナルファンタジ

ファイナルファンタジ

    Pump Up The Fruit

  • 12,134 posts
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2008
  • Location:San Daygo
  • Name:Jerry
  • Fan Since:Forever
  • Fav. Laker:コービーブライアント

Posted January 17, 2009 - 01:03 AM

Sorry, iCarly is a "runningoutofideas" show. Proof that Hannah Montana is better than icarly? [list]
Miley Cyrus net 1 BILLION dollars http://www.babble.co...on-dollars.aspx [list]
icarly girls net worth: $1606 (don't know if that is accurate). She has been around longer than Miley too, with Drake and Josh, so she loses, therefore, iCarly loses, to add on she was in school of rock.....

Just because it's worth more doesn't mean it's necessarily a better show. How can it be "runningoutofideas" already if it's in its second season only. Do you actually watch both shows to be able to make an assumption like that? And what does Hannah Montana have to do with iCarly anyway? You don't base it off the main character of the show and assume that because the girl is worth more money that the show will be of better quality. Like what has Miley done? I've seen the show and her acting and performance level as each season goes by has declined little by little. You also can't say that Miranda has been around longer when she's been in different shows and movies. It's not like the money will decide the quality of the show and therefore make it better. Her roles also vary as well since even though she may have been casted as a main character, it's not like the whole television plot focused on her. Such as Drake and Josh where she played the younger evil sister. She may have been in all the episodes or whatever but doesn't mean she was the focal point of the each and every episode. With Miley, she's the main star and pretty much every episode revolves around her and her life. She's also marketed much heavier than Miranda and gets more products and media coverage. But that doesn't mean that her show is better. I wasn't even comparing the actors anyway as I was comparing the shows. It's like in basketball in what you bring to the court. Some players make more money than others but that isn't going to always mean that the player is always better than someone who makes less money. I mean that link from above isn't really proof if it's just showing the amount of money the star of the show is worth. She does her concerts and TV show as well so like I said before she's making a lot more money probably but the show isn't as good as before. I'm not sure if you read what I wrote last time in the other thread but it's kind of like this post as well because this show is way better. You got to go with quality and not quantity. Hannah Montana (the show) has been around much longer than iCarly so of course there will be a lot of things that they already established. Pretty much in the first two seasons of that show is where it really took off and beginning to spread so much. But after that, the quality has declined (well at least in my opinion) and iCarly just gets better. You just got to watch the shows and appreciate what's there as there probably won't be something like this for a while. But I mean you don't have to because you are entitled to do whatever you want even if this does not affect you in any way and just wasting my time. I just want everyone to know what's up and how the real truth should be presented. Not with some link to an article about some how one girl is worth this much so for some reason this should automatically prove that the show is better because the actress is paid more. It may have more episodes produced, marketed for a much longer time, and overall just been out for a longer period of time but man has the quality dropped off. Seriously because I used to watch it more often than I do now but then I realized that the show may never get back to the progess it had better. Sure it may seem like it's better as the time goes on but overall you just wait for something new to happen when it seems like the episodes feel like a repeat of another one or some sort of alternative. At least with iCarly the ideas are different and it's not repetitive like Hannah Montana (especially the times with Miley and her friendship or relationship struggles; like how many times do they do an episode of that?). Maybe if it was mixed up every so often or with some new variety or anything different. But I think the damage has already been done as too much time has passed on and the only thing they will continue to do (as with all Disney shows) is milk it out for another season or two and try starting a new original series (which they did with Wizards of Waverly Place and a new show that's coming out). They might also try going the other route and create a spin off (which a few older shows have done) but the spin offs of those shows weren't as exciting and entertaining as the original. Also I'm like 99.99% sure of what I'm talking about because I watch all these shows and as well as both channels so I'm not like making this stuff up at the top of my head or anything. I mean there's other things to watch besides basketball right? I feel like if someone is reading this their eyes must be burning (as witnessed before) but I feel like I need to get this off my chest (again, because I already did this in the other thread) and just say what I'm feeling. Basically, you can't judge a show if you haven't watched at least a majority or half of some of the episodes that are currently released or base stuff off other websites. It's kind of like using SparkNotes for books you haven't read and then taking a test and realizing everything you read on the website isn't on the test. Or even those sports analysts that look at the boxscores and stats but don't watch the actual players play. Or even those that choose not to read an article and base everything off of what they already have in mind.

Posted Image
Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.


#39 Base

Base

    Casadee

  • 4,376 posts
  • Joined: Aug 11, 2008
  • Location:Hawaii
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Ime udoka

Posted January 19, 2009 - 10:23 PM

Once again, right on point! 6-0 in this thread.

#40 Nirvana

Nirvana

    Come as you are

  • 5,534 posts
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2008
  • Location:Oh well, whatever, nevermind

Posted January 19, 2009 - 10:27 PM

Base is God, period.
Kurt Cobain - "Wanting to be someone else is a waste of the person you are."




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users