
I toke a print screen cause i was lazy as
lol
Bryant Behind Jordan and Wilt
#1
Posted January 06, 2009 - 02:46 PM

#2
Posted January 06, 2009 - 02:49 PM
#3
Posted January 06, 2009 - 02:49 PM
even given an average of 7 40 point games over the next 5-7 years of his career, that would only add 35-49 more games to his total, and he needs 80 to pass MJ
--
edit: if he needs to average more that seven 40 point games over the next 5-7 years, I will probably be dissapointed
<!--sizeo:2--><span style="font-size:10pt;line-height:100%"><!--/sizeo-->--
I'm always thinking one step ahead. Like a carpenter, that makes stairs. -The Office <!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec--><!--colorc--></span><!--/colorc--><!--sizec--></span><!--/sizec-->
#4
Posted January 06, 2009 - 02:54 PM

#5
Posted January 06, 2009 - 03:04 PM
#6
Posted January 06, 2009 - 03:13 PM
Bleeding purple & gold...
#7
Posted January 06, 2009 - 03:17 PM
What if his field goal percentage was above 70% and he was taking about 15 shots and 10 free throw attempts?I doubt he'll catch MJ,
even given an average of 7 40 point games over the next 5-7 years of his career, that would only add 35-49 more games to his total, and he needs 80 to pass MJ
--
edit: if he needs to average more that seven 40 point games over the next 5-7 years, I will probably be dissapointed

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#8
Posted January 06, 2009 - 03:29 PM
Lol dumb.What if his field goal percentage was above 70% and he was taking about 15 shots and 10 free throw attempts?
#9
Posted January 06, 2009 - 03:33 PM
Can't be dumb if it's already below the under appreciation of repetitive thought. But there is a way to have it become idiotic if it some how reached under the already beneath form of the under appreciated. Perhaps some added pronouns that wouldn't make sense and maybe some commas.No way he can catch up. Those 2 dudes up top were on a whole nother level of scoring throughout their careers. They needed to score a lot early in their careers and were damn good at it, and stayed at that level for years and years.
Lol dumb.

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#10
Posted January 06, 2009 - 04:08 PM
keep in mind lebron isn't somebody who goes off for 40+ often because he usually is 30-35 area
#11
Posted January 06, 2009 - 05:16 PM
#12
Posted January 06, 2009 - 05:28 PM
WHATS FUNNY, IS THE GUY PLAYED WITH SHAQ and great role players, then he had 4 years where he could dominate from a scoring point, and now he has a great supporting cast and despite only having 4 true years to be a dominant scorer, he cracks the top 3
kobe would take the 3 titles over leading the NBA in 40 point games
#13
Posted January 06, 2009 - 05:31 PM
Edited by Kobynum Gasodom 2, January 06, 2009 - 05:31 PM.
#14
Posted January 06, 2009 - 06:00 PM

#15
Posted January 06, 2009 - 08:45 PM
I doubt he'll catch MJ,
even given an average of 7 40 point games over the next 5-7 years of his career, that would only add 35-49 more games to his total, and he needs 80 to pass MJ
--
edit: if he needs to average more that seven 40 point games over the next 5-7 years, I will probably be dissapointed
Pluss he dosen't need to score those points for the Lakers to win.
Hubie Brown: Oh you gotta get a shot here
Mike Breen: Final Seconds.. Bryant for the win, BANG!
Your signature violates forum guidelines.
#16
Posted January 07, 2009 - 09:03 AM

#17
Posted January 07, 2009 - 02:33 PM
Go Lakeshow!!!
#18
Posted January 07, 2009 - 05:30 PM
He should have had many more points yesterday... 4th qtr cmonDamn, he would have 95 now, if he could score 1 more point yesterday.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










