Blazers score Basket Against Celtics Using Six Players On The Court
Posted December 31, 2008 - 05:20 PM
Posted January 01, 2009 - 01:18 PM
Doc gets it - it was one bad play, arguably bad call to count it by the refs. Yet the Celtics, defending champs, complained about it the rest of the game:
“That was awful,” Rivers said. “It absolutely had an affect on our guys. They complained the rest of the game about it. I told them, ‘You got to get over that.’ That was a doozy. There is no excuse for that to happen.
And here is the ref's explanation; which I DON'T agree with:
Said referee Mike Callahan, “If we would have caught the six men on the court before the made field goal, then there would have been no score. We would have called a technical foul on Portland and stopped play.
“After the technical foul shot, Portland would have inbounded the ball as they were in possession before the stoppage.”
:lol: :lol: :lol:
Posted January 01, 2009 - 05:50 PM
Posted January 01, 2009 - 07:13 PM
we should try this in a close game, but first we would need to acquire a small player like earl boykins, it could work...
The Flash .lite :lol:
Posted January 01, 2009 - 07:14 PM
Posted January 01, 2009 - 07:32 PM
These Celtics are a bunch of emotional babies. They're so sensitive. If it happens, MOVE ON. Jeez.
To top it off, they actually have an actual BABY on the team....
Posted January 03, 2009 - 02:52 AM
I didn't defend Boston, I'm defending fairness in the game. And not fairness based on a judgment call, I mean based on the rulebook and not having SIX GUYS on the court! How the [expletive] does that happen!?!??! CMON REFS.
Are you CRAZY!?? It was against Boston so NO, there's NOTHING wrong with that whatsoever at all. Shame on you for defending Boston in the first place.
Stupid Celtics though, they still went up like 10 after that and lost the game still, and didn't lose by 1.
They should have gotten 2 tech FTs at least though, since based on a stupid technicality the shot counted.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users