Lakers coach Phil Jackson's assessment?
"Poor coaching," he said. "That's what it was tonight. Putting too much trust and faith in a younger group -- a second unit. They just can't hold it on the road. They can't withstand the fury or the intensity of the fourth quarter. I'm going to have to change it up a little bit."
Phil Jackson says Coaching was the Problem
#1
Posted December 05, 2008 - 08:43 PM
#2
Posted December 05, 2008 - 08:51 PM
#3
Posted December 05, 2008 - 08:57 PM
#4
Posted December 05, 2008 - 09:25 PM

16 TIME NBA WORLD CHAMPIONS!
Thanks TheBigFish for this great sig
#5
Posted December 05, 2008 - 09:29 PM
I think he will put in the Bench to close out the game, if it's in hand.Or is it actually going to result in a change? Maybe the starting lineup coming out to start the fourth, or maybe a mix of veterans with the young guys to start the fourth.
Knowing Phil he won't change it though, it has worked for all the other games we have won, so why not go with what he knows works?
#6
Posted December 05, 2008 - 10:11 PM
#7
Posted December 05, 2008 - 10:19 PM

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#8
Posted December 05, 2008 - 10:23 PM
He should of said coaching was the problem in the finals
100% agree Javier
he should've used Mbenga and Newble at certain periods to see what they're out there
at least they're more physical than Mihm and Luke

Props to fkMikeBrown
#9
Posted December 05, 2008 - 10:57 PM
I see faith in your eyes
never you hear the discouraging lies
broken is the promise, betrayal
the healing hand held back by deepened nail
follow the god that failed
#10
Posted December 05, 2008 - 11:05 PM
LOL again with the Mbenga and Newble in the finals...one guy is no longer on the team, and the other sits on the sidelines in a suit.
Anyways, is anyone reading in between the lines there? (although I thought it was pretty clear...) He's not actually blaming the coaching. He's putting the onus on the young second unit. All part of his mind games. He's not going to change his rotation, or anything, not yet anyways. He'll wait and see how the second unit reacts to his comments.
Edited by daco_inc, December 05, 2008 - 11:06 PM.
#11
Posted December 06, 2008 - 12:57 AM
#12
Posted December 06, 2008 - 01:03 AM
i would rather of had newble than a gimpy waltondont get how anyone can say DJ or newble would have made any difference in the finals.
Edited by wong63, December 06, 2008 - 01:04 AM.
#13
Posted December 06, 2008 - 01:45 AM
And DJ over Mihm, but like Maddocks said, it wouldn't matter. Phil switching up matchups and Kobe not playing like crap would have changed things.i would rather of had newble than a gimpy walton
And yea, Phil is just putting the blame on the 2nd unit.
#14
Posted December 06, 2008 - 01:52 AM

Props to fkMikeBrown
#15
Posted December 06, 2008 - 02:35 AM
DJ > Mihm that year for sure. He wasn't injured and played much more. But I hate Newble, always have. He sucks.im sure DJ and Newble would've given a better effort than Walton and Mihm
#16
Posted December 06, 2008 - 02:45 AM
DJ > Mihm that year for sure. He wasn't injured and played much more. But I hate Newble, always have. He sucks.
remember in 04/05 he undercut Kobe on a rebound and he suffered a high ankle sprain that pretty much bothered him the rest of the year?

Props to fkMikeBrown
#17
Posted December 06, 2008 - 08:20 AM
As I've said a million times already, it's absolutely ludicrous to even think Mbenga and Newble may have been the difference between winning and losing those final. And if that's not what you are trying to say, then it's pointless even bringing those guys up.im sure DJ and Newble would've given a better effort than Walton and Mihm
#18
Posted December 06, 2008 - 01:31 PM
they may have not made much of a difference but they most likely could have performed better and give a better effort than the injured mihm and walton.. i still remember that play when luke was down the court on a fast break and no one was around him and he was lollygagging around and a boston celtic came out of now where and block his shotAs I've said a million times already, it's absolutely ludicrous to even think Mbenga and Newble may have been the difference between winning and losing those final. And if that's not what you are trying to say, then it's pointless even bringing those guys up.
#19
Posted December 06, 2008 - 02:03 PM
#20
Posted December 06, 2008 - 02:21 PM
Again, if you can't say they were the difference in winning or losing that series, then it's pointless even bringing it up.they may have not made much of a difference but they most likely could have performed better and give a better effort than the injured mihm and walton.. i still remember that play when luke was down the court on a fast break and no one was around him and he was lollygagging around and a boston celtic came out of now where and block his shot
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











