come on cano...look at what you've said man. If you have no problem with it, then just come right out and say it. Given everything you've said and hinted at, I think it's a good possibility that my "assumptions" are on point. If not, then feel free to correct me.
Well I'm here to sadly disappoint you & let you know that possibility does not exist. You want a correction? Here's your correction.
When I say you I should've been more clearer initially in referring to athletes, who have a history of hanging around & [expletive]ing with erotica stars.
Chances he'll be getting some? is just a cheap easy way of driving conversation with simple potential humorous posts nothing more.
STDS confirmed? was simply asking you if maybe you knew about her having some confirmed or not. You said you didn't know and that's that, nothing more again.
Don't they have new laws in place & what not for mandatory condoms though? again is just a legitimate question trying to draw conversation. I expected & wanted a serious mature response and got one from pkflyers, but clearly not from you. You already had your own agenda exposed in your response and you've been on it ever since hellbent on a mission to prove your false assumptions.
I give you some credit though at least certainly the way you set everything up from a neutral perspective, if this were the courtroom you would have a decent case, but since I've told my side of the story now, which is the most legitimate of all cause only I know how I feel & what my intentions are (no one else), then you just have to live with that. You might not agree with it or believe it and that's fine, but all I can do is give you my word and I've given you valid, sincere, & honest explanations as well already to go along with it.