S&T for Ben Gordon, move Kobe to 3?
#21
Posted August 01, 2008 - 12:23 PM
#22
Posted August 01, 2008 - 12:27 PM
GET THE HADS CLAPPING
#23
Posted August 01, 2008 - 12:31 PM
#24
Posted August 01, 2008 - 01:20 PM
#25
Posted August 01, 2008 - 01:33 PM
Undersized SG who is a streaky shooter, doesn't play much D, and wants to get paid?
NO.
#26
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:33 PM

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#27
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:37 PM
I don't think Ben Gordon is the answer. Besides we should focus more on bigs than guards.
I think Ben Gordon could be a great fit for certain teams. The guy could easily put up 20PPG and make clutch shots. However, for those 20PPG, he will probably get 2-3 assists a game and maybe 1 or 2 rebounds. He will contribute absolutely nothing defensively as well as this. He could be a great fit for certain teams, but not for a team like us that needs defense.
#28
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:40 PM
Yeh that's what I mean. Do we really need more offense? I rather go for players that bring defense and some toughness. Unfortunately, Phil Jackson will probably put in Radman or Luke instead.I think Ben Gordon could be a great fit for certain teams. The guy could easily put up 20PPG and make clutch shots. However, for those 20PPG, he will probably get 2-3 assists a game and maybe 1 or 2 rebounds. He will contribute absolutely nothing defensively as well as this. He could be a great fit for certain teams, but not for a team like us that needs defense.

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#29
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:43 PM
Yeh that's what I mean. Do we really need more offense? I rather go for players that bring defense and some toughness. Unfortunately, Phil Jackson will probably put in Radman or Luke instead.
Yeah exactly. I'm not so sure about Radman and Phil. Phil has straight out disrespected Vlad several times. However, Phil DOES love Luke. DEFENSE PLEASE!
#30
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:52 PM
Well hopefully with Ariza back, we'll be seeing more of him and less of Luke.Yeah exactly. I'm not so sure about Radman and Phil. Phil has straight out disrespected Vlad several times. However, Phil DOES love Luke. DEFENSE PLEASE!

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#31
Posted August 01, 2008 - 02:54 PM
Well hopefully with Ariza back, we'll be seeing more of him and less of Luke.
I think that Phil doesn't like Ariza's lack of offensive ability. However, I do see him being used alot more. The ideal would be trading Odom for a SF who can play defense and hit the 3. Shane Battier would be perfect.
#32
Posted August 01, 2008 - 03:06 PM
Wouldn't it be better to see how Odom plays in the starting lineup and if he doesn't fit that well, then try to make a mid-season trade or something?I think that Phil doesn't like Ariza's lack of offensive ability. However, I do see him being used alot more. The ideal would be trading Odom for a SF who can play defense and hit the 3. Shane Battier would be perfect.

Team Farmar
United we stand. Divided we fall.
#33
Posted August 01, 2008 - 03:13 PM
Wouldn't it be better to see how Odom plays in the starting lineup and if he doesn't fit that well, then try to make a mid-season trade or something?
I'd rather know my starting line up from the beggining of the season so I can let them gel. I would be open to giving Odom a chance, even though I don't think he is able to take it. If I get a trade offer I cannot turn down, then I will accept it whether Odom had a chance or not.
#34
Posted August 01, 2008 - 04:18 PM
Go Lakeshow!!!
#35
Posted August 01, 2008 - 04:30 PM
YEA I GOT 20 COMMENTS
![]()
![]()
GET THE HADS CLAPPING![]()
of course youre going to get a lot of comments when you create a thread that proposes a trade for a way undersized SG, that doesnt play defense and wants to make more than antawn jamison
Go Lakeshow!!!
#36
Posted August 01, 2008 - 10:57 PM
Gordon sucks by the way. He is only significant if he can shoot the ball billions of time.
#37
Posted August 01, 2008 - 11:25 PM
Well, i would do thismaybe gordon, hinrick, and another dude but not straight up!
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










