Memphis got Tayshon Prince for Rudy Gay. Prince is quite bad these days.
Careless TOs.
Glad that Lakers did not pick him up.
11 pt game now .. So Jazz would not fall further behind
Posted March 16, 2013 - 08:16 PM
Memphis got Tayshon Prince for Rudy Gay. Prince is quite bad these days.
Careless TOs.
Glad that Lakers did not pick him up.
11 pt game now .. So Jazz would not fall further behind
Posted March 16, 2013 - 08:17 PM
Utah's next 5 are all tough games: @ OKC, vs MEM, vs NY, @ HOU, @ SA.
I'm going to hurt someone if Utah goes .500 during that stretch.
Posted March 16, 2013 - 08:24 PM
I'm going to hurt someone if Utah goes .500 during that stretch.
Hah, I just said they're tough. There's no denying that.
Looking at it closer, I said in another topic that the first 2 aren't as bad. Memphis is on the 2nd night of a back to back and the Knicks have been horrible as of late. And, the Jazz are good at home. I made that observation in the other topic before the Memphis game, so I'm not just saying that because Utah won.
Edited by Japago, March 16, 2013 - 08:25 PM.

Posted March 16, 2013 - 10:50 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 16, 2013 - 11:06 PM
Utah is still a good team at home regardless. They get NY next but then go on a road trip in which they could very well go 0-3 (HOU, SA, and DAL)
Lakers just need to take care of games they should win, which in all reality are the rest of the games in March, the hardest being in Golden State and Milwaukee. If we can go at the very least 5-2 to end March, that will put us in great position heading into April where our schedule picks up. I'll even go as far as to say if we go at least 5-2, we'll be ahead of Utah by at least two games because they are going to lose some games coming up.
Posted March 17, 2013 - 12:14 AM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 17, 2013 - 08:54 AM
Not sure about New York at Utah.
New York has been in a bad stretch. Hopefully they can pull out with a win, but then again, they are playing in Utah, lol.
Edited by Hey, March 17, 2013 - 08:55 AM.
Posted March 17, 2013 - 01:48 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 17, 2013 - 04:27 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 17, 2013 - 05:10 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 05:21 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 05:24 PM
As im the only one still watching all these games
San Antonio is up on the Rockets with a min left..
And Utah is losing to Dallas so far.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 05:31 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 05:33 PM
I'd be a lot more interested if the Lakers actually won their last two games.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 05:56 PM
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there" - John Wooden
Posted March 24, 2013 - 06:57 PM
Edited by Majesty, March 24, 2013 - 07:24 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 07:23 PM
james harden w/ the game winner to beat san antonio...at least utah lost

Posted March 24, 2013 - 07:25 PM
just looked, dallas winning that game gives them the same record as utah...so now both them and utah are 2 games behind us
1 more team to worry about

Posted March 24, 2013 - 07:32 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted March 24, 2013 - 07:42 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users