[expletive] man. Rockets gonna get even better.
Should the Lakers sign Aaron Brooks?
#21
Posted March 01, 2013 - 04:39 PM
#22
Posted March 01, 2013 - 04:45 PM
Rockets will be a 6-7 seed team unless they have a dominant big man.
#23
Posted March 01, 2013 - 04:45 PM
We're overloaded at PG anyways. It would be pointless.
#24
Posted March 01, 2013 - 05:13 PM
We're overloaded at PG anyways. It would be pointless.
yeah scrub pgs.
#25
Posted March 01, 2013 - 05:47 PM
Blake is doing just fine, not sure why he gets so much hate since his return.
I like Brooks and would love for the Lakers to sign him, but that's not happening with our current pg #'s
Blake nearly got a triple double off the bench last night and people still call him a scrub despite his good play since returning.
He's playing like the Blake we expected from Portland and people don't want to let it go.
Dude goes out there last night gets a darn near triple double off the bench and people still got problems with him
If Morris or Duhon did that people woiuld say "amnesty blake! They so nmuch better!"
When Blake does it, it "doesn't matter"
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#26
Posted March 01, 2013 - 05:51 PM
He would be a HUGE PICKUP
#28
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:01 PM
#29
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:05 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#30
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:06 PM
I have a question though. If he is still so great, why did the Kings of s of all teams buy him out? Surely he could have helped.
same reason they traded Robinson, they are high off their own supply
All About Tha NW

"It's gonna take the man in me to conquer this insanity..." -Tupac.
-----------------------
#31
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:19 PM

#32
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:21 PM
NOPE. we got Blake.
#33
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:22 PM
Blake nearly got a triple double off the bench last night and people still call him a scrub despite his good play since returning.
He's playing like the Blake we expected from Portland and people don't want to let it go.
Dude goes out there last night gets a darn near triple double off the bench and people still got problems with him
If Morris or Duhon did that people woiuld say "amnesty blake! They so nmuch better!"
When Blake does it, it "doesn't matter"
not to get too of topic but that is the same thing people say about pau.
#34
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:26 PM
Blake is fine as our backup 1. What we need is a backup 3
It would mess with chemistry the least than having to adjust to a pointguard whose playstyle is 100 percent different from Blake's and Blake's is what makes the bench run so effectively. Getting a completely different pg and handing the reigns to him would screw us up.
We got a good groove with Blake and our bench and he's also part of one of our most efficient lineups. So we don't need to screw that up.
Adding a scoring 3 to end plays requires less adjustments chemistry wise than adding a completely different 1 to initiate plays.
Thats why the Lakers aren't gonna make a move on him.
Also on the nights when Meeks is off Blake is servicable off ball with Nash findinghim till meels comes back on
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#35
Posted March 01, 2013 - 06:48 PM
Would've been a no-brainer for me. A scorer and penetrator off the bench who can chip in 20 every now and then. Don't get me wrong, Blake's been solid since he got back, but Brooks would've given the bench a different dimension.
#36
Posted March 01, 2013 - 07:11 PM
7 rebounds
6 assists
is not ALMOST a triple double...
Falling 1 short in ONE catagory is ALMOST a triple double
Aaron Brooks would be HUGE for the lakers, this year a little bit, but moving foreward he would be better next year.
People forget he is a good player.
He made a bad desicsion during the lockout, and still has not recovered.
It made NO SENSE for him to go to Sactown(where they already had Tyreke Evans, Jimmer, And Isaih Thomas at PG, no thought it was a good idea when it happen, and im glad its over, whoever is advising him is not doing a good job
Morris should have been cut a Long time ago, Duhon is a little bit better then morris at this point, Blake is solid, but Aaron Brooks would be a HUGE upgrade at the PG spot for the lakers.
Houston is slowly becoming one of my more liked teams with their great moves, ownership, and GM
#37
Posted March 01, 2013 - 08:01 PM
lol brooks for backup guard in houston, I don't think that he wants be just a backup player
but for the lakers I would rather have younger legs than old legs
Brooks > Blake
but it is impossible for the lakers to take him cause the lakers has too many guard.
they need to get rid one of those and furthermore the lakers are having luxary tax issue
so I have no Idea on how the lakers could get him.
"If I can do it tomorrow I won't do it today!"
#38
Posted March 01, 2013 - 08:05 PM
Blake nearly got a triple double off the bench last night and people still call him a scrub despite his good play since returning.
He's playing like the Blake we expected from Portland and people don't want to let it go.
Dude goes out there last night gets a darn near triple double off the bench and people still got problems with him
If Morris or Duhon did that people woiuld say "amnesty blake! They so nmuch better!"
When Blake does it, it "doesn't matter"
why are you so enamored with this guy after ONE GAME? name another game where he even had a performance close to this as a laker.
#39
Posted March 01, 2013 - 08:24 PM
so much of being able to stop speedy guards....oh wait..that's what we got steve nash for....![]()
#40
Posted March 01, 2013 - 08:45 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










