Will the Lakers make the playoffs?
#1
Posted February 25, 2013 - 02:14 AM
I calculate it as we cant lose more than 5 games. Because that would put us over 34 losses. With Houstons schedule I dont even see them losing more than 8.
Im going to go with a NO... I hope I eat my words.
#2
Posted February 25, 2013 - 05:08 AM
But its gonna be tight.
Today were 2.5 games out of 8th seed with 25 games left to play and H-Town has 24 games to play.
We need to make up 1 game every 8 games.
Very doable, but like I said....if we fail to grab the 8 seed it will be by a slim margin. Like we'd finish 1/2 a game short.
The next question is, if we take the 8 seed and have to play SA, will Pau be healthy enough to be effective?
And if the Lakers team as is right now builds some chemistry and figures out a game plan to win, do we want to insert a new element into the game plan (being Pau off the injury) that could F things up?
Edited by LakersGAFan, February 25, 2013 - 05:10 AM.
#3
Posted February 25, 2013 - 05:20 AM
#4
Posted February 25, 2013 - 10:24 AM
Their next 14 games:
vs Celtics
vs Hawks
vs Bobcats
@ Bucks
@ Cavs
@ Bulls
@ Knicks
vs Pistons
@ Thunder
vs Grizzlies
vs Knicks
@ Rockets
@ Spurs
@ Mavs
Expect at least 9 losses.
#5
Posted February 25, 2013 - 11:19 AM
I have Lakers 9-5 on their next 14. Let's get it. (I'm crazy but we're gonna do it)
Edited by -Wade-, February 25, 2013 - 11:20 AM.
# "I make shots [expletive]. How much you wanna put on it? How much you wanna put on? 500 grand? What?" --Kobe Bryant
#6
Posted February 25, 2013 - 11:28 AM
Yes, we will.
I have Lakers 9-5 on their next 14. Let's get it. (I'm crazy but we're gonna do it)
We should do better than that

#7
Posted February 25, 2013 - 12:24 PM
#8
Posted February 25, 2013 - 12:46 PM
They are winning games, (which is the only thing that matters), but those wins have come against Boston on the second night of a road back-to-back and the situation just had Lakers won written all over it, and against two teams who are even worse than us in the West. It's great that we won, but I'm not convinced they can sustain it.
If they win tonight, on the road in Denver, tired legs, no Pau, then I'll have some faith.
#9
Posted February 25, 2013 - 12:58 PM
Denver is one of the hardest places to win on a back to back, actually only 3 times have the Nuggets lost at home against a team on a back to back.
So this will be our toughest game, it has loss written all over it especially with Nash's back issues he's dealing with that's throwing off his shot.
So we'll see how they do tonight, I want a win of course but I won't suddenly lose faith if they didn't.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#10
Posted February 25, 2013 - 08:20 PM
#11
Posted February 25, 2013 - 08:32 PM
#12
Posted February 25, 2013 - 08:59 PM
I say 4 more losses (after the Denver Loss) and we are definitely ou tof the playoff race. I dont see houston reachign 34 losses. Nor do I see jazz losing 9 more. Dug ourselves a hole wayyyyy too big.
I dont think it's that bad, but i'm also a hopeless laker-optimist.
Losing against Denver (the best home-team in the NBA) on the second night on a back-to-back is acceptable.
Both Utah and GS are going into very tough stretches now and if we keep winning games and only lose the obvious ones (like the one against Denver and perhaps @OKC and @Atl on the second night of back-to-back) i think we'll make it.
#13
Posted February 25, 2013 - 11:08 PM
I dont think it's that bad, but i'm also a hopeless laker-optimist.
Losing against Denver (the best home-team in the NBA) on the second night on a back-to-back is acceptable.
Both Utah and GS are going into very tough stretches now and if we keep winning games and only lose the obvious ones (like the one against Denver and perhaps @OKC and @Atl on the second night of back-to-back) i think we'll make it.
See thats 3 losses. Its the "stupid" losses that make me worry. The amount of times we fall to teams we are meant to beat is astounding. So yes we are pulling it tight. Lets see how the respond next game.
#14
Posted February 25, 2013 - 11:40 PM
Remember though we will be up and down around .500 until april. We should only lose one game (including the spurs one being that they will probably rest there players) to the clippers.
beating minny on thursday
9-6 in march
7-1 in april
Literally anything less than this we wont make it. Right now though Im not even sure if 45 wins is enough. Utah will probably have to be the team to take.
Houston I think is gonna go 48-34
Utah actually I think will go 43-39 (March is gonna be a tough month for them)
This will come down to 1 or 2 game.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#15
Posted February 25, 2013 - 11:42 PM
Ultimately, I simply think that Rockets better than the Lakers. So, no.

#16
Posted February 26, 2013 - 12:49 AM
We wont go 1.000 the rest of the way, but if we could limit the losses to the games like yesterday (@Den on the 2nd of a b2b) and get an up-set win for every "bad" loss, i think we'll make it.
#17
Posted February 26, 2013 - 01:15 AM
#18
Posted February 26, 2013 - 01:31 AM
#19
Posted February 26, 2013 - 08:10 AM
vs minnesota - W
vs atlanta - W
@ okc - L
@ new orleans (B2B) - W
vs toronto W
vs chicago W
@ orlando W
@ atlanta (B2B) - L
@ indiana - W
vs sac - W
@ phoenix (B2B) - W
vs washington - W
@ golden state - L
@ minnesota - W
@ milwaukee (B2B) - W
@ sacramento - W
that's a very realistic 13-3 projection (only real stretch was @indiana, but I think lakers match up well to their style), would bring our record up to 41-33, which should comfortably put us at the 8th or 7th seed at that point I think. So yes, I do predict we make it, and I expect to pass both Utah and Golden State to be honest, (houston #6, Lakers#7, Golden State #8).
Edited by r9too, February 26, 2013 - 08:11 AM.
#20
Posted February 26, 2013 - 10:02 PM
I have faith.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
-
Google (1)











