Jump to content




Photo

Great Phil Jackson interview about the Lakers, Dwight, Zone Defense, Post-Ups, Etc.


  • Please log in to reply
55 replies to this topic

#1 MDI

MDI

    Jesus Fan

  • 35,947 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Location:Irvine
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 09:39 AM

Zen master doing his thing, he thinks Dwight is right and needs more touches inside as a post up guy :man10:
Maybe he still wants in?

http://sportsillustr...wight-howard/#



Phil Jackson hasn't said much publicly since he was passed over for the Lakers' coaching job in favor of Mike D'Antoni. And he did not use a 60-minute conversation over breakfast last week to launch fusillades against the Lakers. But he did have some comments about the Lakers and a few other things, too.

Some of Jackson's comments appeared in a Sports Illustrated story running this week. (Click here to subscribe to the magazine.)

Jackson wasn't wearing any of his 11 coaching rings on this morning (he also has two as a player from the Knicks), but the subject came up because his book coming out in May is titled Eleven Rings. His favorite, incidentally, is the 1996 ring, the first one of the Bulls' second three-peat, not because of anything that happened during the season, but because it is "the least ostentatious," with a simple four trophies on it.


Note that the interview took place while Dr. Jerry Buss was still alive and in the hospital. Certainly I would've asked Jackson something about the legacy of Dr. Buss, who hired him (twice) and is the father of his longtime companion, and now fiancée, Jeanie Buss, who runs the Lakers' business operations.

One final thing: Jackson has seven grandchildren, from two other marriages, and gave up the fact that Jeanie now allows herself to be called "Granny."


SI: Do you watch a lot of games? Do you have the NBA package?

Phil Jackson: I just got it last week at Jeannie's insistence. She didn't want people thinking that her boyfriend is so poor he can't get all the NBA channels.

SI: Do you take notes in case, you know, future jobs arise?

Jackson: I sometimes take notes. I have some people who have come to me and ask, "Would you watch my team, see if you can pick anything up?" Four or five teams, plus the Lakers. [He wouldn't identify the other teams.] So while I'm not officially in the consulting business, it might come in handy sometime.

Posted Image

SI: You've been away from the game for two years. Do things change quickly in the league?

Jackson: Not really. It's a mimic league. It has been for a long time. Coaches see something and say, "Oh, that's hard to defend. Maybe we'll run that." Screen-roll. Three-point shooters in the corner. Bigs that can roll and pop. San Antonio has a system, a way of doing things, and maybe a couple others. But most everybody runs that screen-roll.


SI: How does the game look to you? Similar from team to team?

Jackson: Yes. Basketball is a simple game. Your goal is penetration, get the ball close to the basket, and there are three ways to do that. Pass, dribble and offensive rebound.


The easiest one is -- or should be -- the pass. But the new rules allow you to throw more people at post-up players. NBA basketball is a big man's game, and in the past they protected that aspect of the game. Well, those rules went out the window and what they didn't do was consider this: If they're going to continue to allow zone defenses to work and shut down the paint, then they have to put six more seconds on the shot clock. A 30-second clock. But they're so attached to the idea of the 24-second clock that it doesn't happen.

SI: Did you bring it up when you were coaching?

Jackson: All the time, all the time. But general managers always dominated those competition committees. Anyway, it [allowing limited zones] has eliminated some of the post passing and made dribbling a major part of our game. As a result, I think people forgot that there are still ways you can get the ball inside rather than just standing there and throwing the ball in. You have to have a system that makes all things work. Pop [San Antonio's Gregg Popovich] has that.


SI: How would you describe that system?

Jackson: Popovich made significant growth 10 years ago or so after David Robinson left. It had been pretty stilted. You know, two big guys. A lot of stuff he does represents the triangle offense. They flow into it a different way. Strong-side triangle. Pinch-post action. Some of it may have come about because we were going at each other all the time in the playoffs and he had to defend against it.

SI: When you won three consecutive titles [2000-02] with Shaq and Kobe, you ran the triangle. But didn't you also get a lot of screen-rolls out of that?

Jackson: Yes, and it came naturally out of the offense. Or it might be a "special." We always had some of those.


SI: When you look at the Lakers now, considering that they've had a lot of personnel changes and injuries, what do you see?

Jackson: They just don't put the ball in the post. They'll use a screen-roll to get the guy in the post. But there's no consistent plan to do it. Yes, Kobe will go in there. But Dwight [Howard] just doesn't get any touches. They've basically eliminated his assets.




SI: But wouldn't his assets be rolling off the screen-roll, with either [Steve] Nash or Kobe?

Jackson: You want the ball 10 feet away from the basket. Throw it into the post, make them double-team and have everybody around to make shots. That's what Shaq could do. That's where you have the Robert Horrys, the Derek Fishers and the Rick Foxes sitting out there getting wide-open jumpers.

SI: But Dwight is not Shaq in that aspect of the game, drawing the double team and finding people. Isn't that true?

Jackson: I think he can be. But he is not where he needs to be physically because of the back surgery. He needs a year to recover from something like that. He's starting to come around, but he has a massive upper body to carry around. He's a terrific athlete, but he still has to get all that back. He's looking better all the time, but his problem right now is turnovers. He's got to have a little better recognition, and that will help him gain the confidence of his teammates and coach, which he does not have now.

SI: How about when Pau Gasol comes back? There seemed to be some problems when they were out there together.

Jackson: Well, what is the problem? We won two championships that way [with two big men]. Pau is one of the best big men in the game. I mean, Pau Gasol is going to be in the Hall of Fame.

SI: Hmm, I love his game, but I don't know about that.

Jackson: He has won European titles with Spain, [he won] two NBA championships. I think he will.


SI: As far as the Lakers go, haven't they been improving?

Jackson: Yes, I think they are finding a way to play. And that's nice to see. Steve has had to sacrifice because Kobe is dominating the ball, but Kobe is showing he can be both playmaker and scorer. Now it's about defense. And I think that's coming around. They make the playoffs, I think they've shown they're going to be in it with every team.

SI: Do you ever feel compelled to catch a game live at Staples Center?

Jackson: I haven't yet. I'll probably go when Shaq's number is retired. [That is scheduled for April 2.]

SI: There's little doubt you had a good run in this town, even after not winning it in, say, 2004, which may have been your toughest season, the one when Karl Malone and Gary Payton joined on.

Jackson: I did have a good run. There were always people who didn't like the triangle, thought it was too methodical, too unlike Showtime. But I was always astonished about how well I was treated. When I came back [in 2005] and took the job, people actually thanked me. They didn't say, "Good luck." They said "Thank you." I never forgot that.


SI: The $12 million question -- and I'm just throwing out a number -- is: Are you going to coach in the NBA again?

Jackson: I'm not coaching. I told Mitch [Kupchak, Lakers GM] that back in October. So when we sat down in November [to talk about taking over after Mike Brown was fired], he brought that up and I said, "Well, this isn't about moving or going somewhere else and learning new players. It's different. So I'm ready to think about coming back, but I still have to think about it."

But I do hold out the idea that there's still influence in the game I could have. Red Auerbach, Pete Newell, Wayne Embry, guys like that have had ... a number of people have had considerable influence and haven't been coaches per se
.

SI: So ... a GM job?

Jackson: I don't like that term. Vice president of basketball operations/director of player personnel is more like it.

SI: Vice president ... that doesn't sound like the boss, but the guy who would report to the owner.

Jackson: No, that guy would be the boss. He would be the president of the organization.

SI: What else do you with your time besides surf the NBA channels ... now that you have the package?

Jackson: I'm a sports-watcher. I played football and baseball, coached baseball. So I watch those things. I watched rugby last weekend. I played hockey in North Dakota growing up and watch a lot of that. We watched Homeland.

SI: You seem like you might be a Breaking Bad guy.

Jackson: I'm not. One of my friends, John Lithgow, was on Dexter. So I watched that until it got too dark. Same with Breaking Bad and Weeds, shows like that. I can't take those shows where the premise is the good guys are breaking the law.

SI: How is your physical condition? [Jackson has had two hip replacements and one knee replacement.]

Jackson: Working out, rehabbing is almost like a job. Monday, Wednesday and Friday, several hours a day.

SI: A final obvious question: What do you miss about coaching?

Jackson: What you might expect. Being around the other coaches, being around the guys. It's what I talked about in my book [Eleven Rings]. Coaching is about, "How do I get these people to play at their peak level?" Yeah, the X's and O's mean something, but you can get people to do that. And a lot of those guys have been hired. The Lawrence Franks and the Frank Vogels. Mike Brown was one of those guys. That's not a knock. Those guys know how to coach the game.

But coaching is much more than that. It is a spiritual quest. And if it's not that, you don't have a challenge, you don't have a mission. Forming a brotherhood and trying to move it forward, that's the part that I miss

.

Edited by MDI, February 19, 2013 - 09:43 AM.

9u6kvo.png

 

Props to sidthekid871


#2 West Coast

West Coast

    LN Senior Editor

  • 21,386 posts
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2008
  • Location:California
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 09:51 AM

Jackson: I don't like that term. Vice president of basketball operations/director of player personnel is more like it.


This is what I think Jim Buss needs to offer Phil Jackson. Let him know that the decisions go through him still but make sure Phil has a part in it. I really won't be surprised if Phil is in the Lakers front office over the next couple of years.

Jim Buss's knowledge of basketball is still unknown to the fans, although people say he knows the game. For him, I think it would be beneficial to surround him self with great basketball minds. I hope Jim does eventually hire Phil, it would really be a big plus for the organization.


Good interview though. Pretty funny how him and D'Antoni's philosophy on the game are night and day.

#3 Ham

Ham

    Rap Enthusiast

  • 6,551 posts
  • Joined: Jul 10, 2012
  • Fan Since:Showtime
  • Fav. Laker:Magic Johnson, Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 09:54 AM

But coaching is much more than that. It is a spiritual quest. And if it's not that, you don't have a challenge, you don't have a mission. Forming a brotherhood and trying to move it forward, that's the part that I miss.


Beautiful.

Mike D'Antoni is GARBAGE.


#4 Majesty

Majesty

    Grats on making the Raiderettes cuzzo!!

  • 37,075 posts
  • Joined: Dec 11, 2011
  • Name:Jay
  • Fan Since:1987
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past

Posted February 19, 2013 - 10:15 AM

So basically about us. Phil says

We are looking better
We will make the playoffs

That we need to get the ball into the post nore with Dwight and run 4 out 1 in, but that Dwight needs to stop turning over the ball when he gets touches in the posst but doesn't blame him for it because he isn't 100 percent, and feels he needs an off season of work 'healthy' to get it back.

All stuff we probably agree with, those of us that aren't panicy complainers anyway.

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to Djokovic? - Robert Flores 


#5 LakersGAFan

LakersGAFan

    The Don, Cappo & Consigliere'

  • 11,435 posts
  • Joined: Mar 17, 2009
  • Location:Tha ATL
  • Name:LT
  • Fan Since:When Magic crossed over the entire Warriors team in like 88. Chis Gatling looked like he was gonna cry.
  • Fav. Laker:KB

Posted February 19, 2013 - 10:24 AM

Pau is one of the best big men in the game. I mean, Pau Gasol is going to be in the Hall of Fame.

Hes a lock imo.

KBdive_zpsa0338da3.jpg


#6 West Coast

West Coast

    LN Senior Editor

  • 21,386 posts
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2008
  • Location:California
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 10:29 AM

Hes a lock imo.


Definite lock.

#7 netlord

netlord

    Flying high

  • 10,683 posts
  • Joined: Jul 29, 2008
  • Location:España
  • Name:Alexi
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe

Posted February 19, 2013 - 10:32 AM

Hes a lock imo.

Hes a lock imo.


Yeah, I think Phil knows a thing or two.
Posted Image

#8 bfc1125roy

bfc1125roy

    Superstar

  • 4,035 posts
  • Joined: Dec 10, 2011
  • Fan Since:2004
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 11:03 AM

Not sure about Phil as a front office guy. I remember he was ready to trade Kobe for Kidd and Marion at one point, although I get young Kobe was pretty frustrating at times. His obsession with scrubs like Luke Walton was also troubling at times.

I think Phil should just stick to what he does best, coaching. I would like to see him become the head coach in the offseason. I think it would help our chances with keeping Dwight as well, and give Nash a set role, something it seems he needs at this point.

#9 Massacre

Massacre

    yo

  • 5,463 posts
  • Joined: Jul 27, 2008
  • Location:Kalifornia
  • Fav. Laker:Yobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 11:14 AM

Love Phil.

Great coach, great basketball mind. You put any other coach in NBA history at the helm of his dynasties and they aren't even close to being as successful.

He really would've helped this team. Even with all our injuries I believe he could've had us in the top 5-6. He's that smart.

Great to read an interview from a real coach, though. It's refreshing. No doubt he will be involved with the Lakers in the future, although it will be interesting to see how it happens since the majority stake isn't split up (rather all one) among the Buss family.

Edited by Massacre, February 19, 2013 - 11:15 AM.

iyjywo.jpg

#10 fido

fido

    Analyst, Moderator, Insomniac

  • 10,919 posts
  • Joined: Aug 01, 2008
  • Location:Costa Mesa, CA
  • Name:Andy
  • Fan Since:1982
  • Fav. Laker:Magic Johnson

Posted February 19, 2013 - 11:21 AM

How did the Lakers pass by Phil for freakin' D'Antoni?!

Unbelievable.

#11 Hollywood

Hollywood

    "Hey Now"

  • 17,703 posts
  • Joined: Dec 27, 2011
  • Location:Berkeley
  • Name:Fernando
  • Fan Since:Kobe Shaq Era
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe, Shaq, West, D12?

Posted February 19, 2013 - 11:54 AM

How did the Lakers pass by Phil for freakin' D'Antoni?!

Unbelievable.


Posted Image

#12 CueTheRain

CueTheRain

    Rookie

  • 824 posts
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2012
  • Fan Since:1990
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:20 PM

Unfortunately, I don't think Jackson will return, as he even said himself in the interview. Hopefully something major changes that would allow this, as he obviously knows how to utilize the two bigs in Pau and Howard.

#13 Bynumite17

Bynumite17

    Huh?

  • 6,327 posts
  • Joined: Jan 31, 2009

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:25 PM

Last paragraph is exactly what we need.

Posted Image


#14 Windu

Windu

    Shatterpoint

  • 43,093 posts
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2009
  • Name:Will
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:26 PM

We need this guy

Pau Gasol is GONE


#15 Majesty

Majesty

    Grats on making the Raiderettes cuzzo!!

  • 37,075 posts
  • Joined: Dec 11, 2011
  • Name:Jay
  • Fan Since:1987
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:28 PM

The reason they passed on Phil was because he told Mitch in October he never wanted to coach again(which he said above) and then when he sat down with Mitch told him the only reason he was considering it was convenience(not having to move and knowing some of the players on the team already) and even with all those advantages he still had to think about it.


Mitch wasn't gonna pay 13 million for a one year contract with a Phil jackson that "may" or "may not be" 100 percent invested in coaching anymore.


Now especially considering the injuries we've dealt with as a team Phil would have been reminded really fast why he stopped coaching.

Our season we got swept by Dallas was full of injury and turmoil. It's just that Metta and Kobe played through it till they had nothing left.

Pau was in "unmotivated" mode still and Blake was too sick to contribute.

Phil checked out on US in that second round and let us get swept because people were either too hurt to make a difference, or had stopped listening completely. And this was a fully invested Phil

Phil with a half in half out mentality having to deal with THIS roster and THESE injuries while also trying to teach them the triangle?

yeah I think Mitch knew that there was going to be very troubling times ahead, and he didn't want to waste 13 million on one year on a Phil Jackson that was unsure if he ever wanted to coach again.

The moment you have to ask yourself "do I really want to do this anymore?" You're done. Mitch knew this, and didn't want to spend 13 million on a gamble.

And considering the injuries and turmoil we've dealt with since then, Mitch was correct.

Great as Phil is, he wouldn't be leading us farther with all the injuries and dead weight on this team.

We have 6 people that will never play(4 are garbage time and 2 are injured).

And we have injuries that our starting center deals with whenever he's on the court.

That's why D'antoni was chosen.

He was invested, and even a day out of leaving the hospital on medication with a knee replacement surgery wanted to coach this team.

Mitch and BOTH Buss's were willing to take that over paying Phil 13 million for a one year "maybe maybe not" scenario.

As a business, I understand that completely.

If you think more like a business man and less like a fan you'd understand too.

Edited by Majesty, February 19, 2013 - 12:30 PM.

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to Djokovic? - Robert Flores 


#16 Windu

Windu

    Shatterpoint

  • 43,093 posts
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2009
  • Name:Will
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:34 PM

This guy loves taking shots at PJ. Bottom line is that the front office chose the much inferior coach.

Pau Gasol is GONE


#17 Majesty

Majesty

    Grats on making the Raiderettes cuzzo!!

  • 37,075 posts
  • Joined: Dec 11, 2011
  • Name:Jay
  • Fan Since:1987
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:46 PM

This guy loves taking shots at PJ. Bottom line is that the front office chose the much inferior coach.


They chose a coach that was invested and wanted to coach the team rather than spending 13 million on a coach that was half in half out.


Tell me, if Phil checked out in the Dallas series when fully invested.

If he came into this season with a half in half out mentality. Had to coach the triangle, had to deal with injuries to Dwight and HAD to deal with Pau ALREADY in his "unmotivated" mode, while already below .500 with 13 million already in the bank, how long would it have taken him to say "screw it".

Earl Clark would still be on the bench too and Pau never would have been benched unless Pau himself went to Phil and said "play Clark over me"

never would have happened.

Phil played Walton over Ariza till Walton told Phil to play Ariza over him.

So adding in all those factors as well as Dwight getting injured twice in that span.

Half in half out Phil Jackson with 13 in the bank probably would have said "screw it" and could have checked out and did check out on us over less.

So Mitch and BOTH Buss's didn't want to take that risk.

If Phil had said "sure, I want to coach this team."

He'd have the job right now.

But him telling Mitch in October he never wanted to coach again, and then when Mitch called him and had a length discussion was told "The only reason I'd do this is because I don't have to really get to know all the players as I know a few and it's convenient for me cause I don't have to travel but even still, I need to think about it." factored in to that decision.

It's not hard to get why Mitch and Jerry and Jim Buss did what they did.

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to Djokovic? - Robert Flores 


#18 bigfetz

bigfetz

    Laker Fan

  • 16,713 posts
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2011
  • Fan Since:2005

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:49 PM

SI: When you look at the Lakers now, considering that they've had a lot of personnel changes and injuries, what do you see?

Jackson: They just don't put the ball in the post. They'll use a screen-roll to get the guy in the post. But there's no consistent plan to do it. Yes, Kobe will go in there. But Dwight [Howard] just doesn't get any touches. They've basically eliminated his assets.

That makes no sense though because didnt someone say how he got the second most touches down low in the league a little while back. Howard gets touches he just does nothing with it because he isnt a good post up player. He has 1 or 2 moves. Howard is usually great at getting the ball on the screen or something like that but he seems to never catch the ball anymore.

Edited by bigfetz, February 19, 2013 - 12:49 PM.


#19 fido

fido

    Analyst, Moderator, Insomniac

  • 10,919 posts
  • Joined: Aug 01, 2008
  • Location:Costa Mesa, CA
  • Name:Andy
  • Fan Since:1982
  • Fav. Laker:Magic Johnson

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:55 PM

Not looking at it as a fan.

I'm looking at it as an organization that knows that winning and the media attention / tv numbers plus casual basketball fan audience Phil bring is greater than any b.s. rhetoric D'Antoni brings.

No matter how much to try to spin it Majesty, they should've done anything they could to bring Phil.

In one interview, one paragraph Phil can correct the Lakers problems. Meanwhile D'Antoni vascilates in his own bizarre basketball reality.

#20 bigfetz

bigfetz

    Laker Fan

  • 16,713 posts
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2011
  • Fan Since:2005

Posted February 19, 2013 - 12:56 PM

In one interview, one paragraph Phil can correct the Lakers problems. Meanwhile D'Antoni vascilates in his own bizarre basketball reality.

lol he's not god.




0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users