"Veteran NBA reporter Chris Sherdian considers Will Bynum the player most likely to be dealt at the Feb. 21 trade deadline"
http://www.sheridanhoops.com/2013/02/05/sheridan-will-bynum-of-pistons-is-prime-trade-target/
Detroit Pistons Looking To Move Will Bynum Before The Trade Deadline
Started by
Cj2008nw
, Feb 08 2013 01:12 PM
26 replies to this topic
#1
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 08, 2013 - 01:12 PM
#2
Michaelyumm
-
-
- 8,649 posts
Quick & Easy
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Dr. Jerry Buss
Posted February 08, 2013 - 01:51 PM
morris, ebanks!
#3
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 11:43 AM
We should Definitely trade for Will Bynum
#4
LakeShow805
-
-
- 4,644 posts
Starter
- Joined: Jun 13, 2011
- Location:Cali
- Name:Tyler
- Fan Since:2000
- Fav. Laker:The mamba
#5
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 01:08 PM
Ebanks?!?!who would they want
#6
Massacre
-
-
- 3,020 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Jul 27, 2008
- Location:San Jose, CA
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 01:20 PM
Let's offer them Duhon and Ebanks, then let Bynum wear #17. That would be great.
#7
West Coast
-
-
- 16,996 posts
Zen Master
- Joined: Jul 31, 2008
- Location:California
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 01:36 PM
Don't need him.
#8
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 01:45 PM
Don't need him.
We need an athletic back up PG what do you mean we don't need him?!!?
#9
idontevenknow
-
-
- 91 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jan 27, 2013
- Name:Zeus
- Fan Since:1990
- Fav. Laker:KB24
Posted February 09, 2013 - 02:49 PM
Why would they want duhon, ebanks, or morris? So unrealistic
#10
ツ
-
-
- 4,809 posts
Starter
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
- Location:California
- Fan Since:2003
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 03:26 PM
idontevenknowWhy would they want duhon, ebanks, or morris? So unrealistic
#11
J-H!zZl3
-
-
- 13,773 posts
New season, same goal.
- Joined: Aug 04, 2009
- Location:New York
- Fan Since:1992
- Fav. Laker:Magic, Worthy, Kareem, Kobe
Posted February 09, 2013 - 04:55 PM
Don't need him.
Technically, you're right West Coast. The Lakers don't need him but having a back up PG like Bynum would do wonders for the bench. He does everything Blake doesn't do well. He can finish well at the rim, a pretty good on ball defender and his dribble penetration would make the bench dangerous. The Lakers are lacking players aside from Kobe and Nash who can penetrate and create something. I've seen this guy absolutely destroy Miami and other teams this season and he has had games like that in past seasons also. He's a very solid basketball player. With all of that being said, I doubt that Detroit would want anything from the Lakers. Lol.
#12
MDI
-
-
- 34,892 posts
Jesus Fan
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
- Location:Irvine
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 05:02 PM
The guy we need to get is Rodeny Stuckey not Will Bynum. Stuckey can play PG/SG we're set at PG, we just need another SG/SF type and a nother big man
Props to fkMikeBrown
#13
Majesty
-
-
- 13,121 posts
Grats on making the Warrior Girls cuzzo!!
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
- Name:Jay
- Fan Since:1987
- Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past
Posted February 09, 2013 - 06:21 PM
The guy we need to get is Rodeny Stuckey not Will Bynum. Stuckey can play PG/SG we're set at PG, we just need another SG/SF type and a nother big man
Go after martell webster then with Hill's exception.
But will Bynum..mmeh well..he's goos but Blake does just fine at backup for us, does what he's supposed to do and it works well.
Stuckey would be nice but idk if the kings would bite.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#14
LakerGeezer
-
-
- 794 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jan 06, 2013
- Location:North Korea
- Fan Since:1990
- Fav. Laker:Dennis Rodman
Posted February 09, 2013 - 06:49 PM
Go after martell webster then with Hill's exception.
But will Bynum..mmeh well..he's goos but Blake does just fine at backup for us, does what he's supposed to do and it works well.
Stuckey would be nice but idk if the kings would bite.
Has Stuckey been traded from the Pistons to the Kings?
I like your Webster idea tho.
Edited by LakerGeezer, February 09, 2013 - 06:49 PM.
#15
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 09, 2013 - 07:32 PM
The guy we need to get is Rodeny Stuckey not Will Bynum. Stuckey can play PG/SG we're set at PG, we just need another SG/SF type and a nother big man
Rodney Stucky has had a horrible season this year
#16
BasketballIQ
-
-
- 688 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Dec 29, 2012
- Name:Dwight Bryant
- Fav. Laker:24
Posted February 09, 2013 - 10:13 PM
Okay...
To me this is a no brainer.Blake has an injury RIGHT now that can come back at any time.
Blake has been playing well though, but Bynum can attack the basket. He would be like having Sessions back. His speed, plus his toughness, it's the BEST move for us to make.
Think about this lineup
Nash-Kobe-Metta-Clark Dwight
Bynum-Meeks, Kobe,-Jamison-Clark
Ideally we would get a combo guard like Delonte West put Will Bynum is the one guy I thought we COULD get and I hope we do.
The thing speed does, is score easy baskets and he makes the whole team faster.
Bynum, Meeks, Jamison, Clark and Dwight would be a playoff team under D'Antoni (in the East)
Mitch , PLEASE do it
To me this is a no brainer.Blake has an injury RIGHT now that can come back at any time.
Blake has been playing well though, but Bynum can attack the basket. He would be like having Sessions back. His speed, plus his toughness, it's the BEST move for us to make.
Think about this lineup
Nash-Kobe-Metta-Clark Dwight
Bynum-Meeks, Kobe,-Jamison-Clark
Ideally we would get a combo guard like Delonte West put Will Bynum is the one guy I thought we COULD get and I hope we do.
The thing speed does, is score easy baskets and he makes the whole team faster.
Bynum, Meeks, Jamison, Clark and Dwight would be a playoff team under D'Antoni (in the East)
Mitch , PLEASE do it
#17
bigfetz
-
-
- 11,116 posts
Laker Fan
- Joined: Dec 20, 2011
- Fan Since:2005
Posted February 09, 2013 - 11:39 PM
?? reasons??? Guy kicked our asses.Don't need him.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#18
West Coast
-
-
- 16,996 posts
Zen Master
- Joined: Jul 31, 2008
- Location:California
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 10, 2013 - 12:18 AM
?? reasons??? Guy kicked our asses.
That's nothing really to write home about. Every bench player kicks our ass.
I'm not saying he's a bad player, but he's not what we need. He's a scoring point guard who doesn't have much of an offensive game if that makes sense, he can't shoot the three ball, has limited playmaking abilities, and can't play defense.
Would I complain if we got him? No because our point guard situation is that bad but I don't think he should be a priority right now.
Our main concern should be moving Metta to the bench or trading him to bring in a quality SF that can score the ball and who is athletic enough to get up and down the floor.
#19
muncher
-
-
- 419 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jul 05, 2012
- Name:Simon
- Fav. Laker:Gary Vitti
Posted February 10, 2013 - 03:22 AM
I rate Will Bynum, I think he would be great as a backup PG that you could groom into a excellent starter.
#20
West Coast
-
-
- 16,996 posts
Zen Master
- Joined: Jul 31, 2008
- Location:California
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted February 10, 2013 - 09:49 AM
I rate Will Bynum, I think he would be great as a backup PG that you could groom into a excellent starter.
At 30 years old, how long could you groom him?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
