61 replies to this topic

[TheOriginalCZM]

Sources: Clippers Pursuing Kevin Garnett

Feb 03, 2013 2:04 PM EST

The Los Angeles Clippers have contacted the Boston Celtics about a potential trade surrounding Kevin Garnett, according to sources.
The two teams were talking ahead of Sunday's game against each other.
The Clippers' offer could include Eric Bledsoe and Caron Butler.
Via Sean Deveney/Sporting News

[ツ]

hell no

[lakers1o1]

Yeah right... Unless DeAndre Jordan or Blake Griffin are involved the Celtics are down bigs and would never do this.

[bigfetz]

I feel like that wouldnt benefit them that much. I really have no idea why they want to make any changes. There having probably there best season ever and they want to mess with that. Thats why the clippers fail year after year.

[Goku]

Bledsoe > Garnett


dumb Sterling.

[magicbalala245]

Yeah right... Unless DeAndre Jordan or Blake Griffin are involved the Celtics are down bigs and would never do this.

Deandre Jordan and Bledsoe for KG? If Clippers truly believe they are one piece away from contending they might offer that package but as the article states KG does have a no trade clause.

[Disaster in Paradise]

Lol, Clippers' FO.

[Gotrings?]

They already have a big man rotation of DJ, Griffin, Odom, and Ronny. With Chris Paul's health problems, this move is absolutely stupid.

[last stand 2.0]

Do it. Clutter your front court in a perimeter league for a guy on his last legs. Though griffin would benefit from garnett

[magicbalala245]

Nevermind I just read the offer would be Bledsoe & Caron for KG.

[fido]

That would be oh so Clipper-esque.

A simply terrible idea, but kinda hilarious.

[LakerGeezer]

^Yeah, about as smart as a first round draft pick for Ramon Sessions, huh?

[West Coast]

^Yeah, about as smart as a first round draft pick for Ramon Sessions, huh?

That's not even bad.

Now trading Nash for an unprotected first rounder, well.....

[Majesty]

That's not even bad.

Now trading Nash for an unprotected first rounder, well.....

Geezer thinks the Clippers have a better owner than the Lakers. He'll say anything.

[fido]

Keep trying Geezer, you've got no juice in that line of thought. It helped the Lakers when they needed it, nobody - including yourself saw him shrinking in the playoffs like he did, or bolting for Charlotte to be a backup there.

Hindsight is 20/20.

Have fun.

[LakerGeezer]

That's not even bad.

Now trading Nash for an unprotected first rounder, well.....

I think they were both bonehead moves. And yes, Majesty, TODAY (not yesterday, maybe not tomorrow) I would submit that the Clippers have a better owner than the disfunctional Buss clan.

[LakeShow805]

I think they were both bonehead moves. And yes, Majesty, TODAY (not yesterday, maybe not tomorrow) I would submit that the Clippers have a better owner than the disfunctional Buss clan.

Today the Lakers still have 16 and the clippers have 0.

Buss > Sterling

[Honey Boo Boo]

Clippers dumb as hell.

[bigvee]

I think they were both bonehead moves. And yes, Majesty, TODAY (not yesterday, maybe not tomorrow) I would submit that the Clippers have a better owner than the disfunctional Buss clan.

The Clippers have gone though so many years of horrid basketball. The Lakers have almost always been in reach to win a title. Even with their record today, most people don't trust what the Clippers will do in the playoffs.

Also, lets not forget the Buss 'clan' were about to make their second superstar steal of the decade in CP3. Lets also not forget that the Clippers would be no where without Chris Paul (2-7 without him I believe), AND they only have him because the Lakers got screwed over a ton.

So no, I don't see why you would even compare the two ownerships.

[Lagunero]

if that were to happen the clipper are dumb. bad trade.