09 finals?I'll take the W, but I won't support it or condone it. That W was luck, and luck won't get a team too far in the playoffs.
LA Lakers at Detroit
#641
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:36 PM
#642
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:37 PM
he plays like an off the dribble guy. lolMeeks is a spot up shooter... as soon as he put the ball down on floor .. it is a Turnover
#643
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:37 PM
No asterisks, no side notes, none of that in the standings. Just wins and losses.
Need to learn how to keep a lead but for the most part there were more positives than negatives. Frustrated the hell out of me but at the end of it all, it's a W.
This team is playing better. To many of you, you look at the lost lead and classify the entire game as a bad one. When you win you win and when you lose you lose, that's how the standings work.
On to Brooklyn
#645
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:38 PM
#646
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:38 PM
#647
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:39 PM
Yea its defiantly not the guy who guarding him fault right. Its defiantly not paus fault there leading scorer monroe with 20 points. Yes pau scored points but it was completely negated with his god awful defense.stop blaming pau. Everyone was getting dunked on.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#648
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:39 PM
it could happenwell hopefully we can get lucky for 16 games in the playoffs
#649
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:39 PM
#650
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:40 PM
look at the teams we are playing we should blow these guy out resting our guys in the 4th. This is a dangerous way to play every team in the league, like Worthy said knows they can come back on the lakers we gained that reputation and we are keeping it.Next thing you know we lose 4 out of 5. I don't buy this crap anymore. Not until we start playing consistent basketball ..
#651
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:40 PM
09 finals?
I'm going to disagree to an extent, but it's cool.
# "I make shots [expletive]. How much you wanna put on it? How much you wanna put on? 500 grand? What?" --Kobe Bryant
#652
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:40 PM
Really? lolYea its defiantly not the guy who guarding him fault right. Its defiantly not paus fault there leading scorer monroe with 20 points. Yes pau scored points but it was completely negated with his god awful defense.
#653
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:40 PM
not happening this year.
I'll still take the Dwight that closed out the Knicks on Christmas.
#654
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:42 PM
I won't argue with you. Ur too smart for me.I'm going to disagree to an extent, but it's cool.
#655
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:42 PM
hey nowI won't argue with you. Ur too smart for me.
#656
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:42 PM
pau closed out the Knicks.I'll still take the Dwight that closed out the Knicks on Christmas.
#657
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:43 PM
heeeey oooooohey now
#658
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:43 PM
This team is playing better. To many of you, you look at the lost lead and classify the entire game as a bad one. When you win you win and when you lose you lose, that's how the standings work.
Very true, that is how the standings work.
I'm still going to be upset though because we won by 1 point (winning by 1 point is not my sole premise). If we would have lost, which we very well could have, everyone would be going ape [expletive] right now. Some don't feel "as bad" because we got the W. The poor performance would feel 10x worse if we had lost.
Edited by -Wade-, February 03, 2013 - 12:44 PM.
# "I make shots [expletive]. How much you wanna put on it? How much you wanna put on? 500 grand? What?" --Kobe Bryant
#659
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:44 PM
Again a win is a win. You can try and argue that all you want but the fact is this team played well except for a stretch of 10 minutes.
No asterisks, no side notes, none of that in the standings. Just wins and losses.
Need to learn how to keep a lead but for the most part there were more positives than negatives. Frustrated the hell out of me but at the end of it all, it's a W.
This team is playing better. To many of you, you look at the lost lead and classify the entire game as a bad one. When you win you win and when you lose you lose, that's how the standings work.
On to Brooklyn
Nothing is black and white. Everything has to be looked at in context. Despite our record I don't think anyone would argue last seasons lakers were better than these lakers. But they won more games. Why? They ran the correct pace, had a defensive system, had chemistry
To just believe a win is a win when the lakers have only been winning like this it doesn't hold merit
If the lakers lose most of their games, and only win ugly, what does that say? That says they aren't very good
#660
Posted February 03, 2013 - 12:44 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








