Devin Ebanks Bad For Chemistry?
#21
Posted January 27, 2013 - 04:29 PM
#22
Posted January 28, 2013 - 10:21 AM
#23
Posted January 28, 2013 - 10:41 AM
#24
Posted January 28, 2013 - 11:01 AM
Hard to feel bad for the guy, too, since he's making more money than I am, and currently has no health problems.
#25
Posted January 28, 2013 - 11:11 AM
Edited by Saber, January 28, 2013 - 11:13 AM.
#26
Posted January 28, 2013 - 04:02 PM
Ebanks hasn't made much of his chances, especially when Brown kept giving them to him. To be honest Clark is closer to what Ariza was for us than Ebanks shall ever be.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#28
Posted January 28, 2013 - 09:19 PM
He had plenty of chances to be part of the team and always blew his chance.
#29
Posted January 28, 2013 - 09:31 PM
#30
Posted January 29, 2013 - 06:15 AM
Yes..Morris went out there and scored 15 in a half once... The best Ebanks has mustered is 8 in a game I believe?
Ebanks hasn't made much of his chances, especially when Brown kept giving them to him. To be honest Clark is closer to what Ariza was for us than Ebanks shall ever be.
Clark is closer to LO rather than Ariza
#31
Posted January 29, 2013 - 06:16 AM
I can't wait for him to be gone after this season.
He had plenty of chances to be part of the team and always blew his chance.
How many chances was that at meaningful mins per gm with starters? Plz dont just say it cuz other people do. HE hardly got any chances. When he started he played fine last season & the 3 games he got this year he played fine. 1 game he got taken advantage of on defensive end. Hell that happens to Jamison every game he plays!
#32
Posted January 29, 2013 - 08:32 AM
#33
Posted January 29, 2013 - 01:53 PM
How many chances was that at meaningful mins per gm with starters? Plz dont just say it cuz other people do. HE hardly got any chances. When he started he played fine last season & the 3 games he got this year he played fine. 1 game he got taken advantage of on defensive end. Hell that happens to Jamison every game he plays!
Mike Brow gave him priority over Meeks. How did that pan out? Exactly.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#34
Posted January 29, 2013 - 10:35 PM
Wow just wow.Bengi #AllDay
@DevinEbanks3
Lookin thru the eyes of a lost soul
#35
Posted January 29, 2013 - 10:37 PM
#36
#37
Posted January 29, 2013 - 10:45 PM
Edited by soooobased, January 29, 2013 - 10:46 PM.

Props to fkMikeBrown
#38
Posted January 30, 2013 - 06:41 AM
Mike Brow gave him priority over Meeks. How did that pan out? Exactly.
How many gms was that & how many meaningful mins with starters?
The only reason Clark is doing #s is cuz he is getting meaningful mins alongside the starters. same thing all these role bench players need to be effective.
#39
Posted January 30, 2013 - 06:51 AM
#40
Posted January 30, 2013 - 05:16 PM
How many gms was that & how many meaningful mins with starters?
The only reason Clark is doing #s is cuz he is getting meaningful mins alongside the starters. same thing all these role bench players need to be effective.
Clark got less chances than Ebanks and he made more out of them and earned his spot.
Its really tiring when people always say 'he didn't get enough chances' Clark got..what..two? And he had a career night and kept it consistent! Its about making the most out of any opportunity. Ebanks has had opportunity after opportunity to break out the way Clark did, he just didnz't. That's not the coaching staff's fault, its Ebanks. Clark did more in less time than Ebanks and thus deserves it more.
Ebanks has no one to blame but himself. Clark is superior at the 3 and the 4 over him and Meeks is a superior 2.
Let it go, Ebanks had his chance and could do nothing with it. It shouldn't take 10 chances for Ebanks to show something Clark did it in 2. Hill did it in one. We aren't gonna wait 20 games for Ebanks to do it, sorry. We're moving on.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users














