Actually you're both wrong.
Hill is statistically the better rebounder than Faried. They showed how far the distance between Hill and Faried and it was hilariously one sided.
Hill IS the better rebounder than Faried. It's not a debate it's statistical fact. Faried just gets more minutes, but Hill is by far the better rebounder, actually he was the best one in the league this year in terms of offensive rebounding efficiency as well.
I remember I believe I posted a statistic earlier in the season showing how far behind Faried was to Hill in rebounding efficiency, but I haven't the time to look it up.
One thing I will tell you is that Jordan Hill is the BEST offensive rebounder in the league. That's not opinion that's a fact. He leaves Faried in the dust in that aspect.
Wouldn't say it if I didn't know it as fact. Maybe you both should research more, watch ESPN less, and not talk out of your rears
Edit here's the stat
Jordan HIll NBA LEADING
Offensive Rebound Rate: 20.2
Defensive Rebound Rate: 19.7
Lets compare to Faried
Offensive Rebound Rate: 13.3
Defensive Rebound Rate: 23.6
Like I said. It wasn't an opinion.
Jordan Hill's the best offensive rebounder in the league and a more efficient one than Faried IF he got the same amount of minutes I wonder what he'd accomplish... he's our steal. Now understand how much not having the NBA's leading offensive rebounder coming off your bench hurts the team
1 hill is not that great of a defender. He isn not. He's been easily scored on many times and isnt a stopper in any means. He can get a few block maybe but that doesnt make a great defender. Far
2 his offense compared to faried is not even close. Faried scores like crazy at times. He will dominate a game. This is a guy who was dominating dwight at times. Hill coud never do this. Ever.
3 hill is not a better rebounder. When you play an entire game with starters you will never get a rebounding rate like a decent rebounder on the bench. Bench players less time and playing against other bench players gets there stats inflated. And the offensive rebounding stat. Ar you kidding me. Best int eh league. That just shows how bull[expletive] it is. You really think Hill then is a better rebounder than Dwight for instance. Because apparently to you that stat means dwight is not as good at offensive rebounds as hill is.
hill gets 6.6 ORB per 36 while dwight only gets 3.3. Wow I guess dwight is only half the rebounder hill is now right.
I can just look at a game between the 2 and they are even close. Faried is an all star. He is amazing player. Hill is also a good player but he's nothing but a bench player.
Also I like how you wrote a paper but yet only provided one random stat that barely means anything.
If he was better than why isn't every NBA team going after him. Maybe because he's an extremely injury prone player, which also factors in why Faried is better being that he's barely missed a game in his career, and that Faried can make a much bigger impact on a game than Hill.
The fact that they are even getting compared is a joke.
Edited by bigfetz, April 20, 2013 - 04:27 PM.