The Lakers would be better without Kobe
#1
Posted January 02, 2013 - 01:54 PM
#2
Posted January 02, 2013 - 01:55 PM

POPULAR
#3
Posted January 02, 2013 - 01:57 PM
#4
Posted January 02, 2013 - 01:57 PM
#5
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:05 PM
Huge cojones on this one...I commend you sir for being brave enough to come on this board and make that statement. I think you have a screw loose but I can't help but applaud your bravery.
As far as this team being better without Kobe, no...I think this team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense but that's not likely going to happen.
Oh well.

I'm BAAACCCKKKKK!!!
#6
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:07 PM
#7
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:10 PM
#8
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:12 PM
LOL...
Huge cojones on this one...I commend you sir for being brave enough to come on this board and make that statement. I think you have a screw loose but I can't help but applaud your bravery.
As far as this team being better without Kobe, no...I think this team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense but that's not likely going to happen.
Oh well.
Its not brave to say this^^^^ = Its old tired cliche ESPN talking Points
#9
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:16 PM
Someone said the team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense, that is definitely true.
#10
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:18 PM
Since when is Kobe averaging 40 shots a game?I'd be pretty confident to guess that if Kobe had to miss 15 games due to injury, you would see Nash and D'antoni right the ship. With Nash they are 3-2, pretty competetive in all the games and wins over Golden State and New York. Yet after a loss Kobe will complain and say it's because they are old, slow, stuck in the mud, etc. which translates to "It's never my fault, no matter what." I think jacking up 40 shots a game when you have 3 other all stars on your team is not the best game plan, especially not night after night.
Someone said the team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense, that is definitely true.
#11
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:20 PM
#12
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:23 PM
Edited by jasonC, January 02, 2013 - 02:23 PM.
#13
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:31 PM
#14
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:33 PM
I'd be pretty confident to guess that if Kobe had to miss 15 games due to injury, you would see Nash and D'antoni right the ship. With Nash they are 3-2, pretty competetive in all the games and wins over Golden State and New York. Yet after a loss Kobe will complain and say it's because they are old, slow, stuck in the mud, etc. which translates to "It's never my fault, no matter what." I think jacking up 40 shots a game when you have 3 other all stars on your team is not the best game plan, especially not night after night.
Someone said the team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense, that is definitely true.
you cant buy into a system that hasnt been established yet! = Nash has missed far too many gms along with Pau. Pau making $20 mill per yr & giving the Lakers a reserve role player production = is the #1 thing plaguing this team. Next is NAsh being injured; then Coach D waiting for 20 gms before finally making drastic changes to the rotations, next D12 is not 100%; ; next no spot up shooters; lastly the teams overall effort on defense
#15
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:40 PM
I'd be pretty confident to guess that if Kobe had to miss 15 games due to injury, you would see Nash and D'antoni right the ship. With Nash they are 3-2, pretty competetive in all the games and wins over Golden State and New York. Yet after a loss Kobe will complain and say it's because they are old, slow, stuck in the mud, etc. which translates to "It's never my fault, no matter what." I think jacking up 40 shots a game when you have 3 other all stars on your team is not the best game plan, especially not night after night.
Someone said the team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense, that is definitely true.
He doesn't average 40 shots a night so I don't understand your point
#16
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:42 PM
Nyu~LOL...
Huge cojones on this one...I commend you sir for being brave enough to come on this board and make that statement. I think you have a screw loose but I can't help but applaud your bravery.
As far as this team being better without Kobe, no...I think this team would be better if Kobe bought into the offense but that's not likely going to happen.
Oh well.
#17
Posted January 02, 2013 - 02:51 PM
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there" - John Wooden
#18
Posted January 02, 2013 - 03:10 PM
The whole team is playing badly right now.
This isn't squarely a Kobe thing.
#20
Posted January 02, 2013 - 03:24 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users



This topic is locked








