Battle of L.A. who wins?
#1
Posted December 29, 2012 - 11:41 AM
#2
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:37 PM
Nothing more
#3
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:37 PM
#4
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:40 PM
Edited by lakerfandude, December 29, 2012 - 12:40 PM.
#5
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:51 PM
Arguably the greatest franchise ever
#6
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:53 PM
Edited by ツ , December 29, 2012 - 12:54 PM.
#7
Posted December 29, 2012 - 12:56 PM
#8
Posted December 29, 2012 - 01:01 PM
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#9
Posted December 29, 2012 - 01:03 PM
#10
Posted December 29, 2012 - 01:39 PM
16 to 0
Nothing more
He wasn't asking who has more rings championships. It was who could win.
#11
Posted December 29, 2012 - 01:52 PM
#12
Posted December 29, 2012 - 01:53 PM
#13
Posted December 29, 2012 - 02:05 PM

Props to fkMikeBrown
#14
Posted December 29, 2012 - 02:16 PM
We beat these guys in a 7 game series 4-2 IMO
Based on what? Your hopes? ANY measureable metric would suggest that the Lakers would lose and lose decisively.
#15
Posted December 29, 2012 - 02:25 PM
#16
Posted December 29, 2012 - 02:28 PM
Today we stand no chance. I hope Crawford torches the former defensive player of the year (MWP) again on Friday night so Mitch might realize that this team desperately needs athleticism and perimeter D.
Once again, I would never hope for one our players to get torched just to prove/disprove something. Also, we can't assume Mitch is lazing around his office eating donuts, have trust in the guy. As for the Clippers, lets how well they do when the game is slowed down.
#17
Posted December 29, 2012 - 03:13 PM
Even after projecting what the Lakers will be at the end of the season though, I think I'd still give the Clippers the advantage.
I see the Lakers improving. Other than the Denver game, the Lakers have been improving on defense. I think their offense was already alright before Nash got back, and it's been even better with Nash back.
But, I think the Lakers' upside is limited with the lack of speed on this team. It really hurts the Lakers defensively.

#18
Posted December 29, 2012 - 03:17 PM
It basically comes down to saying
If we play like we did against the Blazers we torch them 4-2.
If we play like we did against Denver we would lose.
Our team has yet to find the consistency or identity to be able to say. We'll see where we are by the end of January.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#19
Posted December 29, 2012 - 03:19 PM
#20
Posted December 29, 2012 - 03:26 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










