Antawn Jamison
#41
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:26 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#42
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:26 PM
Think they would really take that?No minutes tonight, more than likely going to be traded if tonight is any indication.
What do you guys think about a potential trade with Charlotte that brings us Gerald Henderson? He was being shopped a couple weeks ago, would give us a better option at SG than Morris.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#43
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:31 PM
Think they would really take that?
Well I'm not saying straight up. But maybe Jamison/Ebanks? They are trying to trade Henderson because they have other young players they want to get more playing time.
It's just an idea. Not saying it would happen but since Jamison was considering Charlotte as a free agent, it gives him a chance to go home if that what he wants so thought it was a match.
#44
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:33 PM
Actually henderson is a 3 mill contract. That would mean we would probably have to trade jaminson ebanks and morris and ebanks and morris have to ok it cause they have a no trade clause. Would be tough but maybe.Well I'm not saying straight up. But maybe Jamison/Ebanks? They are trying to trade Henderson because they have other young players they want to get more playing time.
It's just an idea. Not saying it would happen but since Jamison was considering Charlotte as a free agent, it gives him a chance to go home if that what he wants so thought it was a match.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#45
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:43 PM
Will be much better than playing a lineup of Duhon Meeks Morris.
#46
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:44 PM
This is also where Duhon comes into play when Blake returns. If he's all good and running the back up role the way D'Antoni is so high on him for, then we'll see Duhon only when Nash needs a stretch of games at the end of the season with less minutes.
#47
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:45 PM
Mark Medina
Antawn Jamison to me about 5 DNP's: "It doesn't make sense at all. They're pretty much telling me my services are no longer needed."
#48
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:52 PM
Mark Medina
@MedinaLakersNBA
Antawn Jamison to me about 5 DNP's: "It doesn't make sense at all. They're pretty much telling me my services are no longer needed."
Well when it was needed you sure didnt help that much.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#49
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:52 PM
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#50
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:55 PM
also would like to point out were 6-1 when we finally gave up on jaminson.
consitent production/and or shot making at the backup 4 spot really is what has the bench surviving
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#51
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:55 PM
Lol that isn't the reason.also would like to point out were 6-1 when we finally gave up on jaminson.
#52
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:57 PM
Mark Medina
@MedinaLakersNBA
Antawn Jamison to me about 5 DNP's: "It doesn't make sense at all. They're pretty much telling me my services are no longer needed."
Nope his production is very needed, it's just that he decided to coast and it's cost him big time because of Metta's play, Pau's return, and Hill's effort on the court.
I feel very bad for Jamison but in this situation he decided to coast and it's costing him.
Sucks there always have to be SOMETHING to bring down an otherwise positive night. Wouldn't you say?
Edited by Majesty, December 28, 2012 - 10:59 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#53
Posted December 28, 2012 - 10:59 PM
Oh really cuz every sense we have moved metta to the back up for and kobe to the 3 and stopped playing jaminson we have been playing much much better. Jaminson had tons of chances and he was extremly inconstant on offense and was horrible always on defense.Lol that isn't the reason.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#54
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:00 PM
Edited by GMTradePau4aBench, December 28, 2012 - 11:00 PM.
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#55
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:01 PM
lets trade him for a player at a position where services are needed!!! very need actually! PG/SF . PG to add to the bench the only thing the its missing - offense off the dribble (#1need) or a SF so the biggest bum in the nba/dleague doesnt have to play anymore (morris)
if Jamison could play the backup 3 we'd be fine. sadly that's not been the case as of yet. Though he has had moments of playing well, laying an egg during Pau's absense has him in a bad place.
as long as Hill keeps producing and as long as Metta keeps playing the backup 4 well. Then Jamison's only chance is at the backup 3 position.
Edited by Majesty, December 28, 2012 - 11:01 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#56
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:07 PM
Oh really cuz every sense we have moved metta to the back up for and kobe to the 3 and stopped playing jaminson we have been playing much much better. Jaminson had tons of chances and he was extremly inconstant on offense and was horrible always on defense.
You just said it yourself. Metta has been balling since he's moved to the 4 and Kobe has done better as the 3 not having to spend as much energy guarding the 2. Jamison alone wasn't holding the team back from going 6-1, ridiculous. The team has just started to pick it up, having Nash back has helped quite a bit as well.
#57
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:10 PM
My guess is D'antoni doesn't trust a 4/5 lineup with Gasol and Jamison.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#58
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:15 PM
#59
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:15 PM
Serena Winters
@SerenaWinters
I also asked coach D'Antoni if sitting Jamison at the end of the 4th was more of a respect issue for the veteran....he said yes.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#60
Posted December 28, 2012 - 11:23 PM
How does Henderson fit in this team? Jodie already has the backup 2 spot, he can't play the 3, Blake will be at the 1.Maybe he can start at the 2 than Morris I don't know.
henderson from the bobcats? hes a tall 6'5 , he can play the 3 no problem, hes a solid defender and his O is good ,too. hed be good for this team,no doubt
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











