Edited by Japago, December 21, 2012 - 02:42 PM.
Lakers Shopping Entire Bench Outside Of Meeks & Jamison
Started by
True Lakers Fan
, Dec 20 2012 12:44 PM
139 replies to this topic
#61
Japago
-
-
- 3,516 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Aug 02, 2010
- Name:Pat
- Fan Since:1995
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted December 21, 2012 - 02:40 PM
Maybe they can get a solid player on a contract that a team wants to get rid of with some of the expirings.
#62
8RingKobe
-
-
- 317 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Feb 26, 2012
- Fan Since:Birth
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted December 21, 2012 - 03:23 PM
Maybe they can get a solid player on a contract that a team wants to get rid of with some of the expirings.
Dorell Wright? He hasn't been playing that much at Philly has he?
#63
iDreamShake
-
-
- 1,497 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: Sep 28, 2012
- Fan Since:1998
- Fav. Laker:#8
Posted December 21, 2012 - 07:54 PM
Dorell Wright? He hasn't been playing that much at Philly has he?
better not trade jordan hill for a shooter..the 2nd unit needs a playmaker. wright is available tho. barrea for wright was on the table
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#64
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 21, 2012 - 07:55 PM
Dorell Wright? He hasn't been playing that much at Philly has he?
Dorrell Wright isn't that good but Copeland for the Knicks is looking pretty good
#65
ツ
-
-
- 4,813 posts
Starter
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
- Location:California
- Fan Since:2003
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 21, 2012 - 10:44 PM
whats with your infatuation with young players?Dorrell Wright isn't that good but Copeland for the Knicks is looking pretty good
#66
MrKnowItAll
-
-
- 1,541 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: Feb 29, 2012
- Name:Yosif
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Kobe bryant
Posted December 21, 2012 - 10:48 PM
Dorrell wright is a good defender and he has a pretty balanced offensive game. Copeland? U serious?Dorrell Wright isn't that good but Copeland for the Knicks is looking pretty good
#67
DanishLakerFan
-
-
- 1,929 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: May 27, 2011
- Fan Since:1998
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted December 21, 2012 - 11:52 PM
Dorrell Wright would be nice in the system and so would Copeland, who have made a big impact whenever he has stepped on the floor.Dorrell wright is a good defender and he has a pretty balanced offensive game. Copeland? U serious?
#68
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 11:55 AM
whats with your infatuation with young players?
He scored 30 points 2 or 3 games ago and 10 in one quarter... so far he seems pretty decent to me when given minutes
and the last time I checked we needed youth on this team
Edited by Cj2008nw, December 22, 2012 - 11:55 AM.
#69
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:03 PM
Dorrell wright is a good defender and he has a pretty balanced offensive game. Copeland? U serious?
Dorrell Wright had 1 good season I don't think he would help this team he's not really a shot creator and needs to be set up....
and Copeland has had a few good games so far how many good games he'll have in the future IDK but it wouldn't hurt taking risk on youthful players
#70
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:05 PM
Dorrell Wright would be nice in the system and so would Copeland, who have made a big impact whenever he has stepped on the floor.
Copeland did score 30 a few games ago
#71
MrKnowItAll
-
-
- 1,541 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: Feb 29, 2012
- Name:Yosif
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Kobe bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:05 PM
1 good season? Or 1 good game? Which would you rather have?Dorrell Wright had 1 good season I don't think he would help this team he's not really a shot creator and needs to be set up....
and Copeland has had a few good games so far how many good games he'll have in the future IDK but it wouldn't hurt taking risk on youthful players
#72
8RingKobe
-
-
- 317 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Feb 26, 2012
- Fan Since:Birth
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:25 PM
Dorrell Wright had 1 good season I don't think he would help this team he's not really a shot creator and needs to be set up....
and Copeland has had a few good games so far how many good games he'll have in the future IDK but it wouldn't hurt taking risk on youthful players
Wright is a super athletic 3, who can play good defense and make 3's.
#73
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:36 PM
Wright is a super athletic 3, who can play good defense and make 3's.
Okay if that's what you believe I'm not very confident in his game at all
#74
MrKnowItAll
-
-
- 1,541 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: Feb 29, 2012
- Name:Yosif
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Kobe bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:47 PM
Can u specify why? Copeland is averaging 6 points and nothing else. Wright is averaging 8 points and 4.3 reb. And there's no star for good defense other than steals and blocks which are misleading.Okay if that's what you believe I'm not very confident in his game at all
#75
Majesty
-
-
- 13,209 posts
Grats on making the Warrior Girls cuzzo!!
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
- Name:Jay
- Fan Since:1987
- Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:49 PM
Dorrell Wright had 1 good season I don't think he would help this team he's not really a shot creator and needs to be set up....
and Copeland has had a few good games so far how many good games he'll have in the future IDK but it wouldn't hurt taking risk on youthful players
So by your logic 1 good season = not worth the risk
and few good games = it wouldn't hurt taking a risk on him..
Seems legit....
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#76
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:51 PM
So by your logic 1 good season = not worth the risk
and few good games = it wouldn't hurt taking a risk on him..
Seems legit....
I'd rather have a player who productive now than a player that was productive 3 or 4 seasons ago and is not the same player they were
#77
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,048 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 12:55 PM
Can u specify why? Copeland is averaging 6 points and nothing else. Wright is averaging 8 points and 4.3 reb. And there's no star for good defense other than steals and blocks which are misleading.
Well Dorrell Is getting twice as many minutes as copeland and only averaging just 4 more points than him copeland for the season is getting 9 minutes a game averaging 6 points while Wright is getting 21 averaging 10.... I just see Copeland more productive than Dorrell In a way shorter amount of time
#78
soooobased
-
-
- 222 posts
llama
- Joined: Jul 19, 2012
- Location:LA
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe, Shaq, Horry, Fisher
Posted December 22, 2012 - 01:35 PM
Just cut Morris and his buckteeth already.
Props to fkMikeBrown
#79
ツ
-
-
- 4,813 posts
Starter
- Joined: Jul 09, 2010
- Location:California
- Fan Since:2003
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 01:37 PM
btw chris is older than wright.
#80
MrKnowItAll
-
-
- 1,541 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: Feb 29, 2012
- Name:Yosif
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Kobe bryant
Posted December 22, 2012 - 02:35 PM
btw chris is older than wright.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
