Lakers Shopping Entire Bench Outside Of Meeks & Jamison
#21
Posted December 20, 2012 - 03:33 PM
Arguably the greatest franchise ever
#22
Posted December 20, 2012 - 03:37 PM
#23
Posted December 20, 2012 - 04:14 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#24
Posted December 20, 2012 - 04:15 PM
Not that easy bruh.
then keep him if you can't get better value in return
#25
Posted December 20, 2012 - 04:54 PM
"If I can do it tomorrow I won't do it today!"
#26
Posted December 20, 2012 - 05:00 PM
I meant that and also the part where you said trade the whole bench.then keep him if you can't get better value in return
#27
Posted December 20, 2012 - 07:37 PM
Bucks get - Pau,morris//duhon/blake
Celtics get - Hill ,,Cs need rebounding,,reportedly shopping green and Bass for a big. two too many guards,tho.
Starting lineup
Nash
Meeks
kobe
ilyasova- 32% from 3 this year(44%last year) , 9rpg in 27mpg last year , active athlete
Dwight
Bench: this bench will never have problems scoring like our current bench does!!!!!!! bottom line, if we trade pau, we need a starting 4 and DEFINETELY some scorers for the bench,too.
Udrih
Delonte
C.Lee
Mwp/Bass/Jamison
Dwight/ilyasova
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#28
Posted December 20, 2012 - 07:40 PM
I meant that and also the part where you said trade the whole bench.
oh okay but the only thing I could see happening is we trading away our players for picks or maybe us possibly landing Austin Daye for picks.... cause he's the only young wing player that I have heard from teams that they are trying to get rid of and that we could realistically get with no picks
#29
Posted December 20, 2012 - 07:41 PM
LAL get - ilyasova (nash's frye,dwights Anderson) , udrih , c.lee , Bass ,SIGN Delonte,Cut djo
Bucks get - Pau,morris//duhon/blake
Celtics get - Hill ,,Cs need rebounding,,reportedly shopping green and Bass for a big. two too many guards,tho.
Starting lineup
Nash
Meeks
kobe
ilyasova- 32% from 3 this year(44%last year) , 9rpg in 27mpg last year , active athlete
Dwight
Bench: this bench will never have problems scoring like our current bench does!!!!!!! bottom line, if we trade pau, we need a starting 4 and DEFINETELY some scorers for the bench,too.
Udrih
Delonte
C.Lee
Mwp/Bass/Jamison
Dwight/ilyasova
You have a really good imagination
#30
Posted December 20, 2012 - 07:44 PM
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#31
Posted December 20, 2012 - 07:54 PM
I'm assuming Jamison won't be traded because of his small contract, and no one wanting him. We need to get rid of some of our dead weight on this team. We really could use a solid wing player.
#32
Posted December 20, 2012 - 08:44 PM
Ebanks, Clark
Those are really the only two the Lakers could be shopping.
And a lot of it has to do with Blake's injury and how he came back and whether or not it is worth it to keep Duhon and/or Morris.
But in terms of people they shop a lot lately Ebanks is on that list and Clark probably is as well. D'antoni wants to play Hill but is trying to find a place for him and as long as Metta keeps playing great as the stretch 4, him and Jamison are odd men out.
If Hill had a consistent jumper he'd probably get more time in the rotation. But when D'antoni gave him time "recently" that jumper wasn't falling. And D'antoni wants scoring at all position with his lineups(this is why he's putting Kobe at the 3 instead of Ebanks)
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#33
Posted December 20, 2012 - 08:48 PM
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#34
Posted December 20, 2012 - 08:59 PM
i guess ,trade hill for a wing who will actually play,and produce. dj augistine/barbosa/etc
Honestly I think the Lakers are done looking for wing players. I'm pretty sure they're searching for a productive 3(from the bench) or an athletic 4 that has a jump shot.
Ariza would honestly be ideal in this scenario, replacing Ebanks with him.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#35
Posted December 20, 2012 - 09:16 PM
Honestly I think the Lakers are done looking for wing players. I'm pretty sure they're searching for a productive 3(from the bench) or an athletic 4 that has a jump shot.
Ariza would honestly be ideal in this scenario, replacing Ebanks with him.
have to disagree. our bench is only missing dribble penetration. ariza is overrated
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#36
Posted December 20, 2012 - 10:03 PM
#37
Posted December 20, 2012 - 10:06 PM
Lakers get: Vince carter, Collison, Brandon wright.
Mavs get: ebanks, Darius Morris, hill, and djo.
Maybe Rodrique beuobious (or however you spell his name) would be more realistic that collison.
#38
Posted December 20, 2012 - 10:22 PM
#39
Posted December 20, 2012 - 10:58 PM
Trade with the mavs
Lakers get: Vince carter, Collison, Brandon wright.
Mavs get: ebanks, Darius Morris, hill, and djo.
Maybe Rodrique beuobious (or however you spell his name) would be more realistic that collison.
they would never make that trade why would they give there 2 best wing players for out garbage?
#40
Posted December 20, 2012 - 11:55 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










