LA Lakers at Philadelphia
#41
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM
#42
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM

#43
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM
#44
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM
#45
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM
#46
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:21 PM
#47
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:22 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#48
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:22 PM

#49
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:22 PM
#50
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:24 PM
#51
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:24 PM
#52
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:26 PM

#53
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:26 PM
#54
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:27 PM
#55
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:27 PM
Arguably the greatest franchise ever
#56
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:27 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#57
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:28 PM
man dwight better have a 20-20 game tonight against kwame otherwise....lol
You underrate Kwame defensively.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#58
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:28 PM
Dwight's post game is looking progressively worse
or Kwame just is playing good defense
#59
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:28 PM
Dwight's post game is looking progressively worse
His post game has always been poor to say the least.
Arguably the greatest franchise ever
#60
Posted December 16, 2012 - 03:28 PM

0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








