LA Lakers at Washington
#441
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:31 PM
#442
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:32 PM
#443
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:32 PM
win against okc or wiz. They all are same.
in fantasy land
#444
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:33 PM
you'd sell the lakers as an elite team if they were 4-55 so i'm pretty sure you're gonna spin it how you want
All I have to do is spin it by saying we're missing 2 starters, 3 players, and now 4 players and still only losing games by 5 points.
That's all that I need to say. You can keep trying to spin it that Duhon and Morris will be our first and second point guards for the remainder of the season and judge the team on that all you want though
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#445
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:33 PM
#446
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:34 PM
#447
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:35 PM
Edited by lakerfandude, December 14, 2012 - 06:37 PM.
#448
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:38 PM
#449
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:39 PM
time to celebrate
#450
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:42 PM
All I have to do is spin it by saying we're missing 2 starters, 3 players, and now 4 players and still only losing games by 5 points.
That's all that I need to say. You can keep trying to spin it that Duhon and Morris will be our first and second point guards for the remainder of the season and judge the team on that all you want though
But pau sucks having him won't help.

#451
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:44 PM
Wins mean nothing, losses mean everything.
Pretty much, we win against a losing team
"It's just the (losing team's name) it means nothing!"
We win against a winning team
"They held back, eased off the gas, didn't show up, were missing (players name), it means nothing in the grand scheme of things!!!!"
We win 5 in a row
"ZOMG WE'RE GONNA WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP!!! WE GOT IT FIGURED OUT!!!"
We lose 2 in a row
"We suck!!! Let's tank this year!!! Fire (coaches name)!! Trade (Player's name)!! This team makes me sick!"
It's predictable and funny
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#452
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:48 PM
#453
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:56 PM
Now lets try to win more than one in a row
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#454
Posted December 14, 2012 - 06:57 PM
A win against any NBA team. Even the Wizards, is good.
Sad but true.
#455
Posted December 14, 2012 - 07:06 PM
#456
Posted December 14, 2012 - 07:30 PM
#457
Posted December 14, 2012 - 08:30 PM
HOPEFULLY we have momentum nowFinally a W, got some momentum now
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there" - John Wooden
#458
Posted December 14, 2012 - 09:08 PM
LOL...yes we do.
I mean right now. Not talking about Nash and Gasol. I mean on the floor we only have Kobe and Dwight. That's not enough to compete with good teams.

#459
Posted December 14, 2012 - 10:35 PM
I'll take it.
#460
Posted December 15, 2012 - 12:45 AM
Pretty much, we win against a losing team
"It's just the (losing team's name) it means nothing!"
We win against a winning team
"They held back, eased off the gas, didn't show up, were missing (players name), it means nothing in the grand scheme of things!!!!"
We win 5 in a row
"ZOMG WE'RE GONNA WIN A CHAMPIONSHIP!!! WE GOT IT FIGURED OUT!!!"
We lose 2 in a row
"We suck!!! Let's tank this year!!! Fire (coaches name)!! Trade (Player's name)!! This team makes me sick!"
It's predictable and funny
Well if you actually think this win means something it is.
It's also funny when the phrase "we lost by 5, not a blowout" comes out.
This team still isn't going anywhere special.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








