Why not starting Jamison over Gasol?
#1
Posted November 25, 2012 - 02:39 AM
So why not try to inclued Jamison in our lineup? Just because Gasol has the bigger name on his back and the more rings doesnt make him our starter permantly, I mean the actual numbers just say it all!!!!
Plus inclueding Pau with the bench would give him not the big pressure which he has with the first unit.
Dont you think so too?
#2
Posted November 25, 2012 - 02:42 AM
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
#3
Posted November 25, 2012 - 02:48 AM
#4
Posted November 25, 2012 - 03:03 AM
#5
Posted November 25, 2012 - 03:46 AM
"You know you're a nitpicker. You're just a picker of nits..."
-Ralph Garman, The Kevin & Bean Show, KROQ
#6
Posted November 25, 2012 - 03:49 AM
#7
Posted November 25, 2012 - 03:53 AM
#8
Posted November 25, 2012 - 04:29 AM
Bringing Gasol off the bench turns him into a facilitator for the second unit, and while that makes sense (he really does that anyway, just less minutes), that makes Jamison a scorer in the starting five...and we lose bench scoring, gaining nothing back on the defensive end as well.
And if you start hill you lose spacing but gain a ton of defense
I wonder if a
Howard
Hill
Artest
Kobe
Nash
Lineup could work
It allows for a
Gasol
Jamison
Kobe
Meeks
Blake
Bench
#9
Posted November 25, 2012 - 04:43 AM
Yeah, but you're basically turning our bench into easily the worst defensive second unit in the NBA. Kobe's defense wouldn't be able to make up for a Gasol + Jamison duo with him in the frontcourt, along with Meeks (who isn't great on the defensive end) and Blake (who loses his man as well).And if you start hill you lose spacing but gain a ton of defense
I wonder if a
Howard
Hill
Artest
Kobe
Nash
Lineup could work
It allows for a
Gasol
Jamison
Kobe
Meeks
Blake
Bench
That bench could work offensively, but defensively, it would bring tears to my eyes.
#10
Posted November 25, 2012 - 04:52 AM
#11
Posted November 25, 2012 - 06:42 AM
#12
Posted November 25, 2012 - 06:46 AM
Jamison is good but he is not THAT good
Yeah, a couple of good games and the Pau replacement is found. Anything to get rid of Pau. Amirite?
#13
Posted November 25, 2012 - 07:21 AM
Pau is good but he is not THAT good ALSO. I want to seeJamison is good but he is not THAT good
Howard
Hill
Metta
Kobe
Morrison
Follow by:
Pau
Jamison
Metta
Meeks
Duhon
Then:
Howard
Pau
Jamison
Kobe
Morrison
Follow by:
Howard
Hill
Metta
Kobe
Morrison
#14
Posted November 25, 2012 - 08:00 AM
Yeah, but you're basically turning our bench into easily the worst defensive second unit in the NBA. Kobe's defense wouldn't be able to make up for a Gasol + Jamison duo with him in the frontcourt, along with Meeks (who isn't great on the defensive end) and Blake (who loses his man as well).
That bench could work offensively, but defensively, it would bring tears to my eyes.
I can see how that would be an issue. In my ideal world we trade pau for a good SF and bench scorer allowing Ron to start at PF which I think he'd be awesome at
#15
Posted November 25, 2012 - 08:34 AM
kobe hasn't been playing stellar defense latelyYeah, but you're basically turning our bench into easily the worst defensive second unit in the NBA. Kobe's defense wouldn't be able to make up for a Gasol + Jamison duo with him in the frontcourt, along with Meeks (who isn't great on the defensive end) and Blake (who loses his man as well).
That bench could work offensively, but defensively, it would bring tears to my eyes.
#16
Posted November 25, 2012 - 09:24 AM
I just wonder how Pau's "Kleenex thin psyche" got us through three Finals runs and that Game 7 against Boston ? Was AnnoyingCustomer talking about said " Kleenex thin psyche" after that Championship?
Pau played like a man back then. Now he plays like a wimp & acts like one too...
"You know you're a nitpicker. You're just a picker of nits..."
-Ralph Garman, The Kevin & Bean Show, KROQ
#17
Posted November 25, 2012 - 09:29 AM
Jamison needs to stay on the bench
#18
Posted November 25, 2012 - 10:55 AM
#19
Posted November 25, 2012 - 11:24 AM
#20
Posted November 25, 2012 - 11:43 AM
Jamison is good but he is not THAT good
he would thrive with nash . he could be Nash's weaker version of Channing Frye
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











