I am liking this pushing the ball thing
#1
Posted November 16, 2012 - 09:54 PM
#2
Posted November 16, 2012 - 09:55 PM
#3
Posted November 16, 2012 - 09:55 PM
#4
Posted November 16, 2012 - 09:57 PM
Hopefully we won't give up 100 points a game
Speeding up the game means the other team gets more possessions as well. I hope they dont start giving up 105ppg but we will see.
#5
Posted November 16, 2012 - 09:59 PM
#6
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:01 PM
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#7
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:03 PM
Suns are a high scoring team so that will happen. They average 100 points a game so far so its not like they cant score. We did what we should have done though. Scoring 114 is always a good sign.
Agreed, and we dont even have Nash back yet!
#8
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:07 PM
At one point, we were cruising at a pace to reach 150 POINTS!!!!
Hate to say it but I'm in favor of starting anyone but Pau at the 4 (meaning Hill or Jamison). Pau's has not helped Dwight out at all this year. When Dwight rotates over to protect the rim, Pau HAS to pick up Dwight's man, knowing that's where the pass will be going...
Morris had a setback tonight but I think he's still better suited to lead this type of offense than Duhon and possibly Blake.

I'm BAAACCCKKKKK!!!
#9
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:12 PM
#10
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:28 PM
#11
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:32 PM
More possesions = more chances to score for both sides. This was a good test against an athletic team.
![]()
RIP to the Greatest Owner in Sports, Dr. Jerry Buss
#12
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:35 PM
Yea I think this game shows we can run against an athletic team.Suns were averaging 99 points a game coming into tonights game, ranked 7th in the league, a little higher than OKC. Team's like that are going to score the ball, but will have trouble scoring. At least we can get stops when we needed.
More possesions = more chances to score for both sides. This was a good test against an athletic team.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#13
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:36 PM
#14
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:37 PM
We have the pieces to be good defensively...once we get the REAL engine of the offense back (Nash), we will become even more efficient.
At one point, we were cruising at a pace to reach 150 POINTS!!!!
Hate to say it but I'm in favor of starting anyone but Pau at the 4 (meaning Hill or Jamison). Pau's has not helped Dwight out at all this year. When Dwight rotates over to protect the rim, Pau HAS to pick up Dwight's man, knowing that's where the pass will be going...
Morris had a setback tonight but I think he's still better suited to lead this type of offense than Duhon and possibly Blake.
agreed, pau was ball watching on defense too much this game
#15
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:42 PM
So let's not jump to conclusions. We ran a team off the court that has wins over Detroit, Charlotte, Cleveland, and a busted-up, unhealthy Nuggets squad...and a team that is arguably the worst defensive team in the league.
It's fine to push the tempo a bit (never been against that, only against running a run-and-gun offense...two different things), but we can't get carried away because teams that are exceptional back on defense will shut us down, and by the time the end of the third rolls in, a majority of our veterans will be gassed. It's not the running that tires a basketball player, it's how much it takes out of them to score and defend...but, when you run, it's tougher to score when you're much older.
#16
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:47 PM
Before tonight, the Suns came in allowing 104 PPG (29th in the NBA), allowing 47.4% FG (28th) and 44.1% 3PT (30th), 28th in opponent rebounds and 30th in opponent assists. Total defense, 29th in the NBA (and probably 30th after tonight).
So let's not jump to conclusions. We ran a team off the court that has wins over Detroit, Charlotte, Cleveland, and a busted-up, unhealthy Nuggets squad...and a team that is arguably the worst defensive team in the league.
It's fine to push the tempo a bit (never been against that, only against running a run-and-gun offense...two different things), but we can't get carried away because teams that are exceptional back on defense will shut us down, and by the time the end of the third rolls in, a majority of our veterans will be gassed. It's not the running that tires a basketball player, it's how much it takes out of them to score and defend...but, when you run, it's tougher to score when you're much older.
then what that says to me is our bench is going to need to take a bigger amount of the reigns and that Duhon can NOT remain in an active rotation for much longer if he plays D like tonight. I thought he was supposed to be good at defense?
Edited by Majesty, November 16, 2012 - 10:48 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#17
Posted November 16, 2012 - 10:58 PM
Duhon isn't good at anything anymore. Thank God he's only shot the ball six times total this season.then what that says to me is our bench is going to need to take a bigger amount of the reigns and that Duhon can NOT remain in an active rotation for much longer if he plays D like tonight. I thought he was supposed to be good at defense?
#18
Posted November 16, 2012 - 11:00 PM
#19
Posted November 16, 2012 - 11:40 PM
#20
Posted November 16, 2012 - 11:56 PM
That's how I see it at least
Edited by alec613, November 16, 2012 - 11:57 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












