Why didn't the Lakers sign Jamal Crawford also?Jamal
Posted November 14, 2012 - 08:56 PM
I thought about this when I heard that he signed with the Clippers. I've been a huge fan of Jamal Crawford since I started watching him play and I knew that he was going to be a huge player for the Clips once they signed him and it really quite frankly made me mad. Why didn't our management pursue him? Our bench was what needed fixing the most this past offseason and of course I love Dwight and Nash but we could have replaced Murphy/Barnes with Crawford and our bench with just that one dude would be so much more improved.
What do you think?
Posted November 14, 2012 - 09:02 PM
Edited by JSaber20, November 14, 2012 - 09:03 PM.
Posted November 14, 2012 - 09:43 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
Posted November 15, 2012 - 07:45 AM
Posted November 15, 2012 - 11:03 AM
Posted November 15, 2012 - 11:11 AM
Posted November 15, 2012 - 11:17 AM
Edited by KeepItRealOrElse, November 15, 2012 - 11:17 AM.
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Big 4s are OVERRATED. you think Nash/Kobe/Dwight cant carry the whole Offensive load!?
(Peace Pau we need pieces, not MettaWorldPieces!!!!!!!!)
Posted November 15, 2012 - 11:18 AM
But cant deny this guy is rocking in Clipps ..
Edited by fozi, November 16, 2012 - 03:10 PM.
Posted November 16, 2012 - 05:18 PM
Posted November 16, 2012 - 05:39 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users