Edited by LakersFanatic, November 10, 2012 - 06:32 PM.
Lakers @ warriors rotations
Started by
LakersFanatic
, Nov 10 2012 06:32 PM
4 replies to this topic
#1
LakersFanatic
-
-
- 359 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
- Fan Since:2000
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted November 10, 2012 - 06:32 PM
I'm sad to say I wasn't able to watch the game yet. What were the rotations like without Mike Brown?
#2
djcovi
-
-
- 775 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Oct 01, 2012
- Location:San Clemente
- Name:Daniel
- Fan Since:2000
- Fav. Laker:The Mamba
Posted November 10, 2012 - 06:37 PM
Morris, Meeks, Jamison and Hill all saw significant minutes throughout the course of the game. It looked like what the rotation should have been this entire time. Kobe came out with like 4 minutes to go in the 1st I think and Meeks came in for him. No stupid crap like Metta playing the 2. Granted it was against a lesser opponent and only one game, but they looked good because they were able to stay on the floor and establish a rhythm. That's my opinion of what I saw at least. They provided a good spark and were able to hold (and even extend) the lead each time they came in. Pretty sure Bickerstaff kept a couple starters on the court with them.
#3
Majesty
-
-
- 13,012 posts
Grats on making the Warrior Girls cuzzo!!
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
- Name:Jay
- Fan Since:1987
- Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past
Posted November 10, 2012 - 07:33 PM
Morris, Meeks, Jamison and Hill all saw significant minutes throughout the course of the game. It looked like what the rotation should have been this entire time. Kobe came out with like 4 minutes to go in the 1st I think and Meeks came in for him. No stupid crap like Metta playing the 2. Granted it was against a lesser opponent and only one game, but they looked good because they were able to stay on the floor and establish a rhythm. That's my opinion of what I saw at least. They provided a good spark and were able to hold (and even extend) the lead each time they came in. Pretty sure Bickerstaff kept a couple starters on the court with them.
Actually the first bench squad he only kept Pau out there with them
That was the lineup of
Morris, Meeks, Jamison, Hill and Gasol. And it worked tremendously.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#4
djcovi
-
-
- 775 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Oct 01, 2012
- Location:San Clemente
- Name:Daniel
- Fan Since:2000
- Fav. Laker:The Mamba
Posted November 11, 2012 - 02:11 AM
That's right, I couldn't remember if it was just Pau or Pau and Metta. Pau plays well when he's out there with the bench guys, especially Hill. He doesn't need any touches, so Pau can just go to work as the focal point of the offense on the block. Jordan does a great job of being active; spacing the floor a little at the high post, setting screens, then crashing the boards. As long as Pau has an aggressive mindset, he seems to thrive in that role.
#5
JSaber20
-
-
- 709 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
- Name:Jaime
- Fan Since:Birth
- Fav. Laker:Big Game James Worthy
Posted November 11, 2012 - 02:15 AM
Because the bench actually decided to play that night.Actually the first bench squad he only kept Pau out there with them
That was the lineup of
Morris, Meeks, Jamison, Hill and Gasol. And it worked tremendously.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users
