Golden State at LA Lakers (no Mike Brown)
#761
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:51 PM
#762
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:52 PM
#763
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:53 PM
#764
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:53 PM
#765
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:54 PM
It had to have been forever ago (LO era). I don't remember it all last season.when was the last time our bench outscored the other teams' bench?
#766
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:54 PM
#767
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:54 PM
#768
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:55 PM
#769
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:55 PM
#770
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:56 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#771
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:58 PM
#772
Posted November 09, 2012 - 09:59 PM
#773
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:00 PM
#774
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:00 PM
#776
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:03 PM
The only thing that changed tonight was our effort.
We still got every other problem to work on so let's not overblow the win.
great win, and we finally gave effort. But all the previous problems still exist. Hopefully we iron them out.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#777
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:03 PM
#778
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:04 PM
Who cares, we can't depend on Ebanks to stretch the floor out for us as much as Meeks. Nowhere close to the specialist Meeks has been throughout his career.how long is ebanks out?
#779
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:05 PM
1. I like Morris' game
2. Those of you who also like him that are saying 'I told you so' or are saying he should be the backup now need to stop. It's one game, for every good performance he's put up in his young career, he's put up three bad ones. Let's see some consistency first.
I'm sold on Morris for one brutally simple reason. Unlike every other recent guard the Lakers have tried, he doesn't look like he's playing in slow motion. He actually kept his man in front of him, without having to give a 10 foot cushion, which is nearly unheard of for the Lakers.
#780
Posted November 09, 2012 - 10:09 PM
Who says this team can't run!!!!!!!
For varying definitions of 'this team'. I doubt anyone is surprised that if you replace a still-injured Howard with Hill, Nash with Morris, and Ebanks with Meeks... the team gets quicker. That doesn't say much about what they can or cannot do with a completely different lineup, but it was nice to see a little hustle for once.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users









