Harden traded to Houston
#141
Posted October 28, 2012 - 10:59 AM
I'm not going to say this is a huge step down for OKC, though. Kevin Martin could be more efficient in a limited role. When was the last time you saw Martin deferring to a couple of all-stars (one being a superstar)? It could help him focus on the defensive end as well, but you're not going to see THAT big of an improvement on that end of the court (by him). Still, his poor shooting may not carry over, and both Durant and Westbrook will help him get easy buckets.
Meanwhile, Lamb's game may fit in perfectly. We all know what he can do, at least in college, so whether he's out there scoring on his own, or feeding off of Durant and Westbrook...it could still work out well, doesn't matter if he's a starter OR playing behind Martin.
Thing is, you're putting everyone on the table in hopes that Martin will accept such a role AND Lamb will pan out to be the player we all expect him to be...and this is coming from a team that was in the NBA Finals just months ago, with a very young core.
Presti knew Harden was gone, though...and if you're going to trade him by February, you do it now. The later you keep him, the bigger risk of injury AND the lower the value. Teams would rather bring him in now and play him 82 games. Otherwise, you let him walk in July...and go into the playoffs with the same team that, actually, may not have a chance against the Heat OR Lakers to begin with (don't think they did anything to show they can beat the Heat one year later).
It would be nice to see Durant reach into his skillset and pull out improved passing abilities. That will benefit both Lamb and Martin greatly, and will help make up for what is lost with Harden, who was HUGE coming off the bench and facilitating for that second unit.
----------
For Houston, it makes sense. You get rid of Martin's $13 million, even if it's an expiring deal, and in the process, you deal a rookie for a proven borderline all-star in Harden. Now, whether or not Harden deserves that max deal...or if he's a primary option...that's not the point. Right now, you know that Harden is more qualified for it than Jeremy Lamb, and Martin just isn't going to get it done in that large role (never really has).
So, with all things considered, the trade was good for both teams...for the Rockets right now, and for the Thunder in the near future (and, possibly, right now...you never know).
#142
Posted October 28, 2012 - 11:36 AM
#143
Posted October 28, 2012 - 12:41 PM
My girl was pissed when she heard the news, haha.
I'm not going to say this is a huge step down for OKC, though. Kevin Martin could be more efficient in a limited role. When was the last time you saw Martin deferring to a couple of all-stars (one being a superstar)? It could help him focus on the defensive end as well, but you're not going to see THAT big of an improvement on that end of the court (by him). Still, his poor shooting may not carry over, and both Durant and Westbrook will help him get easy buckets.
Meanwhile, Lamb's game may fit in perfectly. We all know what he can do, at least in college, so whether he's out there scoring on his own, or feeding off of Durant and Westbrook...it could still work out well, doesn't matter if he's a starter OR playing behind Martin.
Thing is, you're putting everyone on the table in hopes that Martin will accept such a role AND Lamb will pan out to be the player we all expect him to be...and this is coming from a team that was in the NBA Finals just months ago, with a very young core.
Presti knew Harden was gone, though...and if you're going to trade him by February, you do it now. The later you keep him, the bigger risk of injury AND the lower the value. Teams would rather bring him in now and play him 82 games. Otherwise, you let him walk in July...and go into the playoffs with the same team that, actually, may not have a chance against the Heat OR Lakers to begin with (don't think they did anything to show they can beat the Heat one year later).
It would be nice to see Durant reach into his skillset and pull out improved passing abilities. That will benefit both Lamb and Martin greatly, and will help make up for what is lost with Harden, who was HUGE coming off the bench and facilitating for that second unit.
----------
For Houston, it makes sense. You get rid of Martin's $13 million, even if it's an expiring deal, and in the process, you deal a rookie for a proven borderline all-star in Harden. Now, whether or not Harden deserves that max deal...or if he's a primary option...that's not the point. Right now, you know that Harden is more qualified for it than Jeremy Lamb, and Martin just isn't going to get it done in that large role (never really has).
So, with all things considered, the trade was good for both teams...for the Rockets right now, and for the Thunder in the near future (and, possibly, right now...you never know).
basically what I was saying
#144
Posted October 28, 2012 - 03:16 PM
i was telling my friends that team is going to have to split up eventually...all those guys are gonna wanna get paid
knew this was coming, but didn't think this season...lol
agree with the fact that this isn't a bad trade for OKC, but they're not going to be as good as they were last year this year, this could lead to a better team down the road, but not this season. which means, barring injury, our chances at a western conference championship just got a little better

#145
Posted October 28, 2012 - 05:03 PM
gtfo of this forum and be a basketball analysts
Sadly the media doesn't look for "true" basketball analysts anymore. He'd have to make it big on youtube =p
#146
Posted October 28, 2012 - 07:28 PM
Those type of players and completely different from Lamb..... He's a complete scorer
http://lakernation.com/forums/index.php?/topic/59497-should-the-lakers-go-after-jonny-flynn-pistons-waived-him/page__view__findpost__p__1194430
sssshhhhhhh
#147
Posted October 29, 2012 - 12:11 AM
Houston got their star player...
They have been chasing a big name, and landed it. Good for them.
#148
Posted October 30, 2012 - 02:43 PM
#149
Posted October 31, 2012 - 11:14 AM
Adrian Wojnarowski @WojYahooNBA
James Harden has agreed to a 5 year, $80 million deal with Houston, source tells Y!
#150
Posted October 31, 2012 - 11:19 AM
Edited by Cowboys&LakersFan, October 31, 2012 - 11:19 AM.
#151
Posted October 31, 2012 - 06:01 PM
Overpaid. James Harden is a really good basketball player, but he doesn't deserve max money.
I was going to post something alone these lines... then I saw that he's put up 34 and 11 in his first game tonight, and it's not over. I'm reserving judgement...
#152
Posted October 31, 2012 - 06:03 PM
#153
Posted October 31, 2012 - 06:20 PM
#154
Posted October 31, 2012 - 06:24 PM
I saw him play agains my high school a lot of times back in the day! him and derrick williams!
#155
Posted October 31, 2012 - 09:19 PM
he biggest thing will be how he adjusts when teams start game planning for him.
#156
Posted October 31, 2012 - 09:44 PM
#157
Posted October 31, 2012 - 10:01 PM
#158
Posted October 31, 2012 - 10:05 PM
#159
Posted November 01, 2012 - 03:08 AM
37 and 12, not bad.
Against Detroit.
I'll wait and see.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#160
Posted November 01, 2012 - 03:32 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users











