[expletive].
Why would you cut one of the only NBA level dudes on our bench! This just made our bench [expletive]ing worse.
Our bench was going to be week regardless.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 01:39 PM
[expletive].
Why would you cut one of the only NBA level dudes on our bench! This just made our bench [expletive]ing worse.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 01:40 PM
All it matters to me is that I got it right that CDR was not going to make it past camp.
"The West aint close, now that the LAL got Dwight, who gon stop him on OKC!????" - Chris Webber (nba tv -August)
Posted October 22, 2012 - 01:42 PM
good to know you care about the team. u mean nothing,ur thoughts mean nothing
![]()
RIP to the Greatest Owner in Sports, Dr. Jerry Buss
Posted October 22, 2012 - 01:42 PM
good to know you care about the team. u mean nothing,ur thoughts mean nothing
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:11 PM
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:17 PM
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:25 PM
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:26 PM
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:38 PM
Not really. Already knew it. Guess you haven't been reading most of my posts regarding him lately. Wouldn't surprise me if he eventually gets on to another team and does well. I'll definitely be rooting for him. I'm sure he has a chip on his shoulder.Cano is gonna have a cow
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:38 PM
Nice job cutting a player that had already proven he could log 20-25 contributing minutes a night.
CDR is actually a better player than Ebanks, and better than any other rookie or sophomore we have.
Oh well.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:47 PM
If I had to make sense of it, I'd say they took Goudelock and DJO over him (well, so far) because those two can spread the floor better. LA lacks shooters, and they probably see Ebanks as a versatile slasher, which is what CDR was going to be for us...and sadly, Ebanks has his contract and no-trade clause.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:51 PM
Really? What has he done? Give me some of his biggest games in the regular season, where it counts. Tell me and show me how many moves he has in his offensive arsenal. Please, if you're not truly certain of what you're saying, refrain from doing so.Ebanks is better.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:55 PM
Who had more points? Ebanks against the kings on Friday? Or CDR in the whole preseason?Really? What has he done? Give me some of his biggest games in the regular season, where it counts. Tell me and show me how many moves he has in his offensive arsenal. Please, if you're not truly certain of what you're saying, refrain from doing so.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 02:58 PM
Really? What has he done? Give me some of his biggest games in the regular season, where it counts. Tell me and show me how many moves he has in his offensive arsenal. Please, if you're not truly certain of what you're saying, refrain from doing so.
Edited by gque24, October 22, 2012 - 02:59 PM.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:06 PM
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:08 PM
Our bench is NOT atrocious.Damn it...No words. Our bench offense is atrocious, and we let go of a guy who can actually score!!
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:08 PM
If I had to make sense of it, I'd say they took Goudelock and DJO over him (well, so far) because those two can spread the floor better. LA lacks shooters, and they probably see Ebanks as a versatile slasher, which is what CDR was going to be for us...and sadly, Ebanks has his contract and no-trade clause.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:09 PM
One thing some fans don't realize, that even though we heard he did good in practices or had a nice pre-season game, there are always reasons to why players get cut such as not understanding the offense, understanding defensive schemes or just being inconsistent.
The way I look at it, if this guy was going to be a legitimate bench impact, why let him go? That's a decision made by the coach, his staff, and the front office.
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:09 PM
he most likely has more points than steve nash too. guess he's better than nash. Stupid logic is Stupid.Who had more points? Ebanks against the kings on Friday? Or CDR in the whole preseason?
Posted October 22, 2012 - 03:10 PM
"If I can do it tomorrow I won't do it today!"
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users