486 replies to this topic

[Hollywood]

Lamo his shot!

[Majesty]

5 seconds more.Fixed. One, not two or more.

A lot of his lack of shots had to do with Goudelock deciding to force the shot rather than pass him the ball wide open on the wing. So I don't blame him for that.

http://sports.yahoo....?gid=2012101913

Check it. I'm only helping folks be factually correct, don't see the wrong in that and I'm not trying to be an ass about it in the process like most usually are.

[Majesty]

Mike Brown saying that if we add up the transition points and second chance points that the Kings had 50 points of them.

That's a lot. Having Howard makes a difference cause Sacre ain't exactly a rebounder.

[KobeBeef24]

I can't help but laugh when Mike Brown talks, it just looks like he's about to burst into laughter.

[Hollywood]

Pau played 2nd most min behind sacre. Mb working pau too hard. 3 hour practices then 28 min of play not good.

[Majesty]

3 turnovers by Sacre tonight... not good..

I can't help but laugh when Mike Brown talks, it just looks like he's about to burst into laughter.

You mean like this:



?

3 turnovers by Sacre tonight... not good..

Oh come on, Nash had 4.

[Majesty]

Pau played 2nd most min behind sacre. Mb working pau too hard. 3 hour practices then 28 min of play not good.

They've already said they are running Pau to get his conditioning up as he wasn't in "shape" coming into camp which amazes me considering he just came from the Olympics.. how do you lose your conditioning in that span of time?

[Hollywood]

Nvm pau played 31 min more than any kings player.

[Majesty]

You mean like this:



?

Oh come on, Nash had 4.

There's a difference between a pass first point guard having 4 turnovers and a center having them. he also had a couple of needless fouls and missed rebound opportunities which lead to second chance points for the Kings.

Great game by Jamison. 7 points on 3-7 in 31 minutes.

how do you lose your conditioning in that span of time?

He was probably partying too hard and getting laid by a bunch of fine Spanish chicks.

Edited by    , October 19, 2012 - 08:46 PM.

[lildvl10]

You mean like this:



?

Oh come on, Nash had 4.

hahaha

[ツ]

i fell asleep what happened in the 4th?

[JSaber20]

Andy Adlers arms are like sticks.

^ She's still working there? Man they should've hired someone like Jaime Maggio. Nice thick blonde who actually knows her Lakers and sports too!

[ツ]

explain what happened i fell asleep after the 3rd. ebanks 20 points?!?!

Yeah, pretty much. Ebanks just set himself up for a nice well-deserved extension. Our future looks bright!

[Michaelyumm]

Can anyone give me a breakdown? I missed the game! so who did well and did bad? And how'd CDR do?

[Majesty]

Can anyone give me a breakdown? I missed the game! so who did well and did bad? And how'd CDR do?

CDR missed a shot, but really didn't get a chance to do much as Goudelock wouldn't pass him the ball and had no idea how to run the point guard position. He played decent defense though.

Ebanks had his coming out party today going 4/5 from 3 and getting 20 points off the bench. Sacre missed some key rebounds on the 50-50 and had some needless turnovers and rookie mistakes. Goudelock looked atrocious at the 1, and only scored when the offense was run to him instead of trying to run it. Gasol messed up a nice dish from CDR by getting a wide open dunk and it flailing out of his hands when he jumped from point blank range.. and the game was still within reach.


All and all Goudelock showed why he isn't gonna make the team, Sacre showed why he will likely spend time in the NBDL to even out the edges, and CDR didn't get a chance to show much in the first half because of lack of feeds or people missing shots off passes he gave them.

So nothing to take from this game that we didn't already know other than Nash is getting MUCH better defensively, Kobe can still JUMP and Ebanks may finally have become the player we were all expecting him to be.


also u can always go here and hope its replaying the game

http://atdhenet.tv/52886/watch-sacramento-kings-vs-los-angeles-lakers

Edited by Majesty, October 20, 2012 - 03:06 AM.