Gilbert Arenas
#1
Posted October 18, 2012 - 11:07 AM
Last year:
Arenas: 4.2 ppg in 12.4 mpg
Blake: 5.2 ppg in 23.3 mpg
Here's a video of probably his best game in Grizzlies
Not to mention he also knows how to play pick n roll with Howard
In my opinion it's definitely a low-risk, high-reward if we sign him.
#2
Posted October 18, 2012 - 11:23 AM
#3
Posted October 18, 2012 - 11:53 AM
Yeah right... so that's why we almost got Beasly last season for Steve Blake.How are we gonna trade Blake and/or Duhon when nobody wants them?
#4
Posted October 18, 2012 - 12:19 PM
#5
Posted October 18, 2012 - 12:55 PM
And why?Hell to the no
#6
Posted October 18, 2012 - 01:58 PM
#7
Posted October 18, 2012 - 02:29 PM
old? He's younger than Blake, he's only 30 and Blake is 32. He might not be as explosive as he was but he's still more explosive and still better than Blake.old, injured, washed, you name it.
#8
Posted October 18, 2012 - 03:12 PM
In Mitch I trust.
#9
Posted October 21, 2012 - 12:51 AM
Im pretty sure we were giving up more than blake. If that is so then thats why the trade didnt go through. Also blakes stock was higher at that time than it is now. Duhon and blake are un-tradable. Everyone can try to rationalize it as much as you want to think someone would take them but no one would. The GM to take that trade would lose his job the next day.Yeah right... so that's why we almost got Beasly last season for Steve Blake.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#10
Posted October 21, 2012 - 09:00 PM
The only reason the trade didn't happen because Minnesota didn't want to take Fisher's contract and maybe some other guy's too. But the Blazers definitely agreed to take Blake for Jamal Crawford and the Lakers suppose to receive Beasly. And it's not like were asking for talent for a return for Blake or Duhon.Im pretty sure we were giving up more than blake. If that is so then thats why the trade didnt go through. Also blakes stock was higher at that time than it is now. Duhon and blake are un-tradable. Everyone can try to rationalize it as much as you want to think someone would take them but no one would. The GM to take that trade would lose his job the next day.
#11
Posted October 21, 2012 - 09:05 PM
#12
Posted October 22, 2012 - 08:17 PM

#13
Posted October 24, 2012 - 09:16 PM
Team Pau
Team Ron Ron
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











