Golden State at LA Lakers [Preseason]
#541
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:13 PM

#542
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:13 PM
#543
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:13 PM
#544
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:14 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#545
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:14 PM
Yes! CDR > Ebanks, Morris, Glock, Duhon, and Clark!no backup 3
#546
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:14 PM
CLARK!!
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#547
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:15 PM
#548
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:15 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#549
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:15 PM
Fool! That's because we actually know what we're [expletive]in' talking about. We know what this guy is capable of. We've actually followed some of his career along with college. He had two 30 point games in his rookie year. We KNOW that he can do more than Ebanks. You apparently don't so it's better you stay quiet since you clearly sound ignorant not knowing.I was jk because ppl get cray over a basket
Edited by , October 07, 2012 - 08:16 PM.
#550
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:16 PM
#551
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:16 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#552
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:16 PM
Fool! That's because we actually know what we're [expletive]in' talking about. We know what this guy is capable of. We've actually followed some of his career along with college. He had two 30 point games in his rookie year. We KNOW that he can do more than Ebanks. You apparently don't so it's better you stay quiet since you clearly sound ignorant not knowing.
#553
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
Edited by Giovani, October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM.
#554
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
Lol as a neutral party, it seems you're just getting a little too worked up right now.Fool! That's because we actually know what we're [expletive]in' talking about. We know what this guy is capable of. We've actually followed some of his career along with college. He had two 30 point games in his rookie year. We KNOW that he can do more than Ebanks. You apparently don't so it's better you stay quiet since you clearly sound ignorant not knowing.
#555
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#556
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
#557
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
Exactly.CDR already has 6 I think.
I feel like it's Jordan Hill all over again to some extent. When I was one of the only few ones calling him for him constantly and he had hater Laker fans always putting him down until one day he got a legitimate chance and never looked back. Hollywood, you don't wanna' be one of those fools.
#558
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:17 PM
#559
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:18 PM
This guy is unreal. Just a natural scorer. Lakers staff would be idiots to not put this guy on the roster, let alone not in the rotation.CDR already has 6 I think.
#560
Posted October 07, 2012 - 08:18 PM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








