This guy(goudelocke) needs 20 a night no joke. He's got the skills and he'll be open a lot this season. He can be our ray Allen killer. 2 mambas > 1 mamba
Mini Mamba playing time
Started by
Kobe>Jordan
, Sep 04 2012 01:33 AM
153 replies to this topic
#1
Kobe>Jordan
-
-
- 479 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Apr 03, 2012
- Name:Kobe
- Fan Since:Vietnam
- Fav. Laker:Magic
Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:33 AM
#2
SweatShop
-
-
- 425 posts
Throwin Rootbeers In Your Fridge
- Joined: Jul 31, 2012
- Location:818
- Fan Since:Pre_History
- Fav. Laker:Kup
Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 AM
come on dude how is he gonna be a ray allen killer when he cant guard ray allen's grandpa? dont you think its a bit premature to compare the guy to ray allen? i hate ray but he is a far better player than goudelock in every respect at this point. goudelock needs to improve his quickness, defense and point guard abilities before he mambas anything. he will never be kobe but hopefully he will work half as hard as kobe at bettering his game.
Edited by SweatShop, September 04, 2012 - 01:57 AM.
#3
Michaelyumm
-
-
- 8,649 posts
Quick & Easy
- Joined: Jul 24, 2008
- Fan Since:I was born
- Fav. Laker:Dr. Jerry Buss
Posted September 04, 2012 - 02:39 AM
#4
Cowboys&LakersFan
-
-
- 6,333 posts
Go Lakers!
- Joined: Jul 13, 2010
- Name:JD
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe & Shaq
Posted September 04, 2012 - 03:21 AM
#5
Makaveli
-
-
- 13,206 posts
where will i go?
- Joined: Jan 27, 2009
- Location:Estonia.
- Fan Since:'06
- Fav. Laker:Kobe 'Bean' Bryant.
Posted September 04, 2012 - 06:00 AM
... you just don't get it, OP
How did rap music go from really good to so dry?
Real artists get shelved and whack one's get famous
To leave masses brainless, a smart mind is dangerous
In their eyes there probably ain't no real [expletive] in your playlist
You're just a product of what the government has created
#6
CJ-
-
-
- 27 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Oct 07, 2008
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 06:14 AM
No offence but if Goudlock is a 20 min a game player because he made a few shots then we should go ahead and retire Kareem Rush's jersey
#7
fido
-
-
- 8,078 posts
Analyst, Moderator, Insomniac
- Joined: Aug 01, 2008
- Location:Costa Mesa, CA
- Name:Andy
- Fan Since:1982
- Fav. Laker:Magic Johnson
Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:56 AM
If Goudelock needs to contribute that much or plays 20 minutes a game, that would only mean that the team is incredibly injured.
Goudelock is not that good.
Goudelock is not that good.
#8
erfolk
-
-
- 451 posts
Rookie
- Joined: May 02, 2011
- Name:Lewis
- Fan Since:Birth:10-31-86
- Fav. Laker:All Bout The Name On The Front
Posted September 04, 2012 - 11:30 AM
This guy makes he most pointless post
#9
bfc1125roy
-
-
- 3,397 posts
Superstar
- Joined: Dec 10, 2011
- Fan Since:2004
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 12:22 PM
With Meeks now on our roster, I don't see that much playing time for Goudelock. If he wants any meaningful playing time he'll have to battle against Meeks and Blake in practice to work for it.
#10
gque24
-
-
- 3,322 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Sep 03, 2009
- Location:Sky High
- Fan Since:1985
- Fav. Laker:KOBE
Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 PM
Was thinking more like 3mins per quarter
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!
#11
Majesty
-
-
- 13,121 posts
Grats on making the Warrior Girls cuzzo!!
- Joined: Dec 11, 2011
- Name:Jay
- Fan Since:1987
- Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past
Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 PM
With Meeks now on our roster, I don't see that much playing time for Goudelock. If he wants any meaningful playing time he'll have to battle against Meeks and Blake in practice to work for it.
Don't see that happening honestly, Morris is the better point guard than Goudelock so he'd more than likely be the one battling Blake. Goudelock is about 2 years away from battling Meeks for a spot at the 2. Unless the Lakers ran a lineup which featured Meeks at the 1 position, Goudelock won't see much playing time, from what we saw in the summer league, Morris has progressed further than he has during the off-season. But Goudelock HAS put in a lot of work int he off-season trying to lose weight and regain some speed. To be honest in an offense like the Princeton we COULD afford to run a smaller lineup if we put Gasol at the center if we REALLY wanted to spread the floor and have Goudelock AND Meeks out there at the same time. The only issue would be if Goudelock could have the playmaking ability necessary for the Princeton. That has yet to be seen and who knows, maybe after doing all of it in practice for so long he'll become a better playmaker. I mean the Princeton can be tweaked to appeal to every players strength so I'm sure goudelock could benefit from it as well. That's the beauty of our offense, EVERYONE is the scoring option within it, so if we ran a spread lineup that included Goudelock and Meeks it's possible, but I don't see it unless they are resting Blake for some reason.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#12
Cj2008nw
-
-
- 3,047 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Dec 26, 2011
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 07:16 PM
Morris>>>>>> Goudelock..... Goudelock has no defense and no offensive intangibles
#13
lakers1o1
-
-
- 871 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Dec 20, 2011
- Name:The Black Mamba Will Rise
- Fan Since:1996
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bean Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:12 PM
Really dude???
Adam Morrison on our bench with his suit on is more productive and entertaining than Goudelock.
I had some high hopes going into this season but after Summer League, NOPE.
Adam Morrison on our bench with his suit on is more productive and entertaining than Goudelock.
I had some high hopes going into this season but after Summer League, NOPE.
#14
West Coast
-
-
- 16,995 posts
Zen Master
- Joined: Jul 31, 2008
- Location:California
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:15 PM
Goudelock showed more than Morris last season.
.......
Why am I even voicing my opinion about two second round scrubs .... SMH
.......
Why am I even voicing my opinion about two second round scrubs .... SMH
#15
lakers1o1
-
-
- 871 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Dec 20, 2011
- Name:The Black Mamba Will Rise
- Fan Since:1996
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bean Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:18 PM
Goudelock showed more than Morris last season.
.......
Why am I even voicing my opinion about two second round scrubs .... SMH
Haha!
If you're under the wings of Steve Blake, you know theres gotta be a problem.
#16
Emorej
-
-
- 159 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Dec 12, 2011
- Name:Jerome
- Fan Since:1991
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:41 PM
WTF! No way!!
#17
JSaber20
-
-
- 709 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Jul 10, 2012
- Name:Jaime
- Fan Since:Birth
- Fav. Laker:Big Game James Worthy
Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:21 PM
Goudelock is a waste of a roster spot.
#18
bigfetz
-
-
- 11,116 posts
Laker Fan
- Joined: Dec 20, 2011
- Fan Since:2005
Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:25 PM
Goudlock will be lucky to be on this team by the start of this season. He's a scrub.
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#19
RayRay
-
-
- 3,400 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Jun 18, 2009
- Fan Since:Since 96
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Hobe
Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:32 PM
Goudelock with that.
only Kobe can stop Kobe.
#20
West Coast
-
-
- 16,995 posts
Zen Master
- Joined: Jul 31, 2008
- Location:California
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:33 PM
Kinda surprised with the Goudelock hate in this thread. Especially since many were complaining he wasn't getting enough time during the season.
Goudelock actually produced when given minutes. He won't see the floor expect in garbage time. Meeks is taking minutes at the back up 2
Goudelock actually produced when given minutes. He won't see the floor expect in garbage time. Meeks is taking minutes at the back up 2
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
