Jump to content




Photo

Mini Mamba playing time


  • Please log in to reply
153 replies to this topic

#1 Kobe>Jordan

Kobe>Jordan

    Rookie

  • 479 posts
  • Joined: Apr 03, 2012
  • Name:Kobe
  • Fan Since:Vietnam
  • Fav. Laker:Magic

Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:33 AM

This guy(goudelocke) needs 20 a night no joke. He's got the skills and he'll be open a lot this season. He can be our ray Allen killer. 2 mambas > 1 mamba

#2 SweatShop

SweatShop

    Throwin Rootbeers In Your Fridge

  • 603 posts
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2012
  • Location:818
  • Fan Since:Pre_History
  • Fav. Laker:Magic

Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 AM

come on dude how is he gonna be a ray allen killer when he cant guard ray allen's grandpa? dont you think its a bit premature to compare the guy to ray allen? i hate ray but he is a far better player than goudelock in every respect at this point. goudelock needs to improve his quickness, defense and point guard abilities before he mambas anything. he will never be kobe but hopefully he will work half as hard as kobe at bettering his game.

Edited by SweatShop, September 04, 2012 - 01:57 AM.

Abdul-Jabbar told the San Francisco Chronicle last month he met Howard only once and that Howard expressed an interest in learning from the former Lakers captain but he never again reached out to Abdul-Jabbar.

‘He’s charming, he’s charismatic, very nice young man,’ Abdul-Jabbar said. ‘Maturity-wise, he doesn’t get it.’

#3 Michaelyumm

Michaelyumm

    Quick & Easy

  • 10,325 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Fan Since:93
  • Fav. Laker:Javaris Crittenton

Posted September 04, 2012 - 02:39 AM

:laughing:

#4 Cowboys&LakersFan

Cowboys&LakersFan

    Go Lakers!

  • 6,333 posts
  • Joined: Jul 13, 2010
  • Name:JD
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe & Shaq

Posted September 04, 2012 - 03:21 AM

:facepalm:
htCCl0m.png

#5 Makaveli

Makaveli

    where will i go?

  • 13,312 posts
  • Joined: Jan 27, 2009
  • Location:Estonia.
  • Fan Since:'06
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe 'Bean' Bryant.

Posted September 04, 2012 - 06:00 AM

... you just don't get it, OP

#6 CJ-

CJ-

    Rookie

  • 27 posts
  • Joined: Oct 07, 2008
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 06:14 AM

No offence but if Goudlock is a 20 min a game player because he made a few shots then we should go ahead and retire Kareem Rush's jersey

#7 fido

fido

    Analyst, Moderator, Insomniac

  • 10,854 posts
  • Joined: Aug 01, 2008
  • Location:Costa Mesa, CA
  • Name:Andy
  • Fan Since:1982
  • Fav. Laker:Magic Johnson

Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:56 AM

If Goudelock needs to contribute that much or plays 20 minutes a game, that would only mean that the team is incredibly injured.

Goudelock is not that good.

#8 erfolk

erfolk

    Rookie

  • 610 posts
  • Joined: May 02, 2011
  • Name:Lewis
  • Fan Since:Birth:10-31-86
  • Fav. Laker:All Bout The Name On The Front

Posted September 04, 2012 - 11:30 AM

This guy makes he most pointless post

#9 bfc1125roy

bfc1125roy

    Superstar

  • 4,035 posts
  • Joined: Dec 10, 2011
  • Fan Since:2004
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 12:22 PM

With Meeks now on our roster, I don't see that much playing time for Goudelock. If he wants any meaningful playing time he'll have to battle against Meeks and Blake in practice to work for it.

#10 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,143 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 PM

Was thinking more like 3mins per quarter
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#11 Majesty

Majesty

    Grats on making the Raiderettes cuzzo!!

  • 36,754 posts
  • Joined: Dec 11, 2011
  • Name:Jay
  • Fan Since:1987
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past

Posted September 04, 2012 - 01:57 PM

With Meeks now on our roster, I don't see that much playing time for Goudelock. If he wants any meaningful playing time he'll have to battle against Meeks and Blake in practice to work for it.


Don't see that happening honestly, Morris is the better point guard than Goudelock so he'd more than likely be the one battling Blake. Goudelock is about 2 years away from battling Meeks for a spot at the 2. Unless the Lakers ran a lineup which featured Meeks at the 1 position, Goudelock won't see much playing time, from what we saw in the summer league, Morris has progressed further than he has during the off-season. But Goudelock HAS put in a lot of work int he off-season trying to lose weight and regain some speed. To be honest in an offense like the Princeton we COULD afford to run a smaller lineup if we put Gasol at the center if we REALLY wanted to spread the floor and have Goudelock AND Meeks out there at the same time. The only issue would be if Goudelock could have the playmaking ability necessary for the Princeton. That has yet to be seen and who knows, maybe after doing all of it in practice for so long he'll become a better playmaker. I mean the Princeton can be tweaked to appeal to every players strength so I'm sure goudelock could benefit from it as well. That's the beauty of our offense, EVERYONE is the scoring option within it, so if we ran a spread lineup that included Goudelock and Meeks it's possible, but I don't see it unless they are resting Blake for some reason.

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to Djokovic? - Robert Flores 


#12 Cj2008nw

Cj2008nw

    Sixth Man

  • 3,115 posts
  • Joined: Dec 26, 2011
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 07:16 PM

Morris>>>>>> Goudelock..... Goudelock has no defense and no offensive intangibles

#13 lakers1o1

lakers1o1

    Off The Bench

  • 2,521 posts
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2011
  • Name:The Black Mamba Will Rise
  • Fan Since:1996
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bean Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:12 PM

Really dude???
Adam Morrison on our bench with his suit on is more productive and entertaining than Goudelock.
I had some high hopes going into this season but after Summer League, NOPE.

kb24_zpscc8c9e5b.jpg


#14 West Coast

West Coast

    LN Senior Editor

  • 21,380 posts
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2008
  • Location:California
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:15 PM

Goudelock showed more than Morris last season.




.......




Why am I even voicing my opinion about two second round scrubs .... SMH

#15 lakers1o1

lakers1o1

    Off The Bench

  • 2,521 posts
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2011
  • Name:The Black Mamba Will Rise
  • Fan Since:1996
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bean Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:18 PM

Goudelock showed more than Morris last season.




.......




Why am I even voicing my opinion about two second round scrubs .... SMH


Haha!
If you're under the wings of Steve Blake, you know theres gotta be a problem.

kb24_zpscc8c9e5b.jpg


#16 Emorej

Emorej

    Rookie

  • 164 posts
  • Joined: Dec 12, 2011
  • Name:Jerome
  • Fan Since:1991
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 08:41 PM

WTF! No way!!

#17 JSaber20

JSaber20

    Rookie

  • 727 posts
  • Joined: Jul 10, 2012
  • Name:Jaime
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Big Game James Worthy

Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:21 PM

Goudelock is a waste of a roster spot.

MDADefense_zpsb51f57fb.jpg


#18 bigfetz

bigfetz

    Laker Fan

  • 16,641 posts
  • Joined: Dec 20, 2011
  • Fan Since:2005

Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:25 PM

Goudlock will be lucky to be on this team by the start of this season. He's a scrub.

#19 RayRay

RayRay

    Sixth Man

  • 3,524 posts
  • Joined: Jun 18, 2009
  • Fan Since:Since 96
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Hobe

Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:32 PM

Goudelock with that.
only Kobe can stop Kobe.

#20 West Coast

West Coast

    LN Senior Editor

  • 21,380 posts
  • Joined: Jul 31, 2008
  • Location:California
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted September 04, 2012 - 09:33 PM

Kinda surprised with the Goudelock hate in this thread. Especially since many were complaining he wasn't getting enough time during the season.

Goudelock actually produced when given minutes. He won't see the floor expect in garbage time. Meeks is taking minutes at the back up 2




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users