Lakers looking at Josh Smith
#221
Posted February 20, 2013 - 03:40 AM
He's still green andf it shows, but if there's one "youthful" project the Lakers should keep its Clark. Forget Ebanks and send Morris to the dleague.
That position isn't as blaring a problem as our backup 3. That's why a Webster would come in handy.
But still if you have the chance to get Smith without losing someone vital you do it.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#222
Posted February 20, 2013 - 04:13 AM
You are talking as if Josh Smith is doing an epic job over in Hawks. He shoots 46 percent from the field and take awful amount of 3s for a guy who doesn't have much range. He is not exactly a 10+ rebounder. He's at same weight, an inch smaller than Clark. Possibly more explosive. He is not a 20+ ppg player. Never been. It's not like Earl Clark is averaging 10 a night because it's his ceiling. It's because of the pecking order. And if Josh Smith comes here, within the D'Antoni system he'll have to obey that or don't obey and be inefficient like MWP, and actually hurt the team.
So what does he have over Earl Clark? Why should we play him over Clark and also pay him MAX ? Does it make sense?
#223
Posted February 20, 2013 - 12:12 PM
Edited by BleedPurple&Gold, February 20, 2013 - 12:21 PM.
#224
Posted February 20, 2013 - 12:31 PM
Defensively more savvy and also more experience in an important role. Clark has amazing potential and a high ceiling and I'd love for him to discover it here. He can lbe.a 17 amnd 10 guy that can guard 4 positions and stretch the floor while being a good passer. And a lineup of Nash/Kobe/Clark/Hill/Howard is scary. And means Metta could come off the bench again. But at the same time Clark does still have his green moments but could really find himself here. I'm fine with keeping Clark if we didn't get Smith.
He's still green andf it shows, but if there's one "youthful" project the Lakers should keep its Clark. Forget Ebanks and send Morris to the dleague.
That position isn't as blaring a problem as our backup 3. That's why a Webster would come in handy.
But still if you have the chance to get Smith without losing someone vital you do it.
Clark will never be a 17 and 10 guy who can guard 4 positions. There aren't even that many players in the NBA that can do that now, and even less than can guard 4 positions, if any. At best, I see him at like 12/8 who can play the 3 and 4 and occasionally the 5 if we want to go extra extra small. His strength is going to be a hustle player and stretch 4 who gets easy buckets from cuts and open shots due to the defensive attention the other stars on the team draw. Kind of like a Trevor Ariza type guy (as a Laker in 2009) with less foot speed but more size.
#225
Posted February 20, 2013 - 12:31 PM
Pao? The guy is $18mm and not worth it. He's really a $12mm kinda guy, so unless we want to pay a third of his salary, which counts against the salary cap, that trade makes no sense.
MWP is likewise overpaid.
So the trade bait is Duhon and Eubanks. Can anyone say we would get something that would impact the team with these guys?
I think not.
#226
Posted February 20, 2013 - 01:04 PM
Very good point. Hope earl isn't reading this he may think he's a max player too.@Chad
You are talking as if Josh Smith is doing an epic job over in Hawks. He shoots 46 percent from the field and take awful amount of 3s for a guy who doesn't have much range. He is not exactly a 10+ rebounder. He's at same weight, an inch smaller than Clark. Possibly more explosive. He is not a 20+ ppg player. Never been. It's not like Earl Clark is averaging 10 a night because it's his ceiling. It's because of the pecking order. And if Josh Smith comes here, within the D'Antoni system he'll have to obey that or don't obey and be inefficient like MWP, and actually hurt the team.
So what does he have over Earl Clark? Why should we play him over Clark and also pay him MAX ? Does it make sense?

#227
Posted February 20, 2013 - 01:40 PM
@Chad
You are talking as if Josh Smith is doing an epic job over in Hawks. He shoots 46 percent from the field and take awful amount of 3s for a guy who doesn't have much range. He is not exactly a 10+ rebounder. He's at same weight, an inch smaller than Clark. Possibly more explosive. He is not a 20+ ppg player. Never been. It's not like Earl Clark is averaging 10 a night because it's his ceiling. It's because of the pecking order. And if Josh Smith comes here, within the D'Antoni system he'll have to obey that or don't obey and be inefficient like MWP, and actually hurt the team.
So what does he have over Earl Clark? Why should we play him over Clark and also pay him MAX ? Does it make sense?
Josh Smith's last five games: 21.4 ppg, 10 rpg, 5.0 apg, 1.6 bpg, 0.8 spg, 54.4 fg pct, 64.7 3-pt pct
Mike D'Antoni is GARBAGE.
#228
Posted February 20, 2013 - 01:55 PM
#229
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:06 PM
Mike D'Antoni is GARBAGE.
#230
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:17 PM
Clark, as a starter, is averaging 11.1 ppg - 8.4 rpg shooting 46 percent from the field and 40 percent from 3s. He is not a guy that disrupts your offense. He hustles all the time. He doesn't raise expectations but still gets the job done. Look at his stats in the key matchups this season.
If I'm given an option to choose one of them, I pick Earl Clark any day of the week.
#231
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:23 PM
Just Stop.
Edited by Ham, February 20, 2013 - 02:26 PM.
Mike D'Antoni is GARBAGE.
#232
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:24 PM
#233
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:27 PM
You'd be horrible GM to pay Josh Smith MAX. when we have Earl Clark. That would be on Knicks - Isiah Thomas level.
#234
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:28 PM
Edited by Ham, February 20, 2013 - 02:29 PM.
Mike D'Antoni is GARBAGE.
#235
Posted February 20, 2013 - 02:29 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#236
Posted February 21, 2013 - 01:37 AM
#237
Posted February 21, 2013 - 01:50 AM
Pau is the one that would be shipped out.
Edited by Chad, February 21, 2013 - 01:53 AM.
#238
Posted February 21, 2013 - 04:18 AM
#239
Posted February 21, 2013 - 05:06 AM
I think the Lakers should make a run at J-Smoove. He's not a max, but he is one of the pieces that Dwight would like to play with and he is an extremly good defender.
Pau Gasol and Earl Clark for Josh Smith and a Kyle Korver....
#240
Posted February 21, 2013 - 06:11 AM
The Rockets are involved at a "high level" in talks for Smith, a league source tells Ken Berger of CBSSports.com (Twitter link).
But Houston has leverage: cap room this summer to land Smith as a free agent. Limits the assets they are willing to part with now.
Teams pursuing Josh Smith deal believe Atlanta is still searching for a trade scenario that ships him to the Western Conference.
Houston is still lingering in Josh Smith talks, but Atlanta's desire for Asik and Parsons is a non-starter for Rockets, sources tell Y!
Remember, Houston has the space to sign Smith as a free agent this summer. They're not going to overpay to trade for him now.
Atlanta has to do the best possible deal for Smith. That could still be the Bucks in the East, but again, Hawks prefer to send him West.
https://twitter.com/WojYahooNBA
Edited by Chad, February 21, 2013 - 06:18 AM.
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










