Jump to content




Photo

Should D12 and Andrew Bynum agree to extensions now? - Larry Coon


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 Jackson

Jackson

    All-Star

  • 5,662 posts
  • Joined: Dec 10, 2011
  • Location:Honolulu, Hawaii
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant/Kareem/Sasha(LOL)

Posted July 30, 2012 - 11:13 AM

Everyone thought there would be a resolution to the Dwight Howard situation by now. Instead, August is almost here and Howard is still a member of the Orlando Magic -- and just as determined to leave as he ever was.

The Brooklyn Nets, Los Angeles Lakers and Houston Rockets all tried to put together a blockbuster trade package, only to find dead ends. Compounded by Howard's childish ambivalence and waffling, everyone is weary and ready to move on. The Lakers are frustrated. The Magic are frustrated. Howard is frustrated. And now Houston has signed its draft picks, which means they can't be traded for 30 days -- as late as Aug. 25, if Jeremy Lamb is included in a deal.

So what's the holdup?

Ironically, the same system that was supposed to help give teams the ability to retain their players is now making it harder for the Magic to find a suitable deal for Howard, even when they are ready to trade him.

One confounding factor is teams' hesitation to give up the farm to acquire a star player as a one-year rental. Teams contemplating an Andrew Bynum acquisition face a similar predicament. The Magic wouldn't want to trade for Bynum only to find themselves in the same situation they were in with Howard.

Similarly, any team that acts as a facilitator by taking Bynum would need some assurance that he'll be around past June. Such assurance has not been forthcoming.

One sticking point has been the rules related to extensions:

•A free agent can sign for up to five years when re-signing with his prior team, or four years when signing with a new team.

•Extensions are limited to four years, but always include the remaining years on the player's current contract. Players like Howard and Bynum therefore can add only three new seasons via extension. Even if the extension is signed June 30, the day before the player becomes a free agent, the current season counts as one full year toward the extension.

It's an odd limitation, given that the league's goal with the new collective bargaining agreement was to help improve the ability for teams to retain their star players. So players such as Howard and Bynum are left to choose between adding three years of security via an extension, versus four or five by first becoming a free agent. It's no surprise that they might prefer to wait for free agency, even if they intend to re-sign with their prior teams.

But this means that any team trading for one of these players has to assume the risk of losing him in next summer's free-agent market. Trade offers will be lower as a result, making Magic general manager Rob Hennigan less likely to pull the trigger on a deal.

Let's look at four additional factors weighing down this process:

1. Injury risk
A four- or five-year contract could vanish if either player sustains a career-ending injury before becoming a free agent. Is this likely? Not necessarily -- Howard is coming off back surgery, but his surgeon said he should be fine even if he proves to be not quite ready by the time the season starts.

Bynum has a history of knee problems, but some of those injuries were flukes (like when Kobe Bryant rolled into his knee), and he completed the 2011-12 season without any issues. Players risk injury every time they take the floor, but career-altering or career-ending injuries are rare.

2. Maximum salaries
There are three tiers, which are based on the number of years the player has been in the league. A player with 10 or more years in the league has a higher maximum salary than a player with seven to nine years, who in turn has a higher maximum than a player with fewer than seven years. The maximum salaries change each year in conjunction with the salary cap. For example, this year the maximum for a player with zero to six years is $13,688,750; for a player with seven to nine years is $16,402,500; and for a player with 10 or more years is $19,136,250.

A player can always receive up to 105 percent of his previous salary in a new contract, even if that amount is above the league-wide maximum. Howard is on the books for $19,536,360 in 2012-13, and is slated to become a free agent next summer, when he will have nine years under his belt. This means that his 2013-14 salary can be up to $20,573,178 if he signs as a free agent.

The salary in the first season of an extension is limited to 107.5 percent of his previous salary, but cannot be above the maximum. This means that Howard could receive no more in an extension than he could receive by becoming a free agent. In other words, there is no incentive for Howard to sign as a free agent in order to receive a higher salary.

Hward-Bynum
Gary A. Vasquez/US PresswireHoward and Bynum are well positioned for recurring max deals in their careers.

Bynum is a more difficult case to analyze. He is slated to earn $16,889,000 in 2012-13, and would enter free agency next July with eight years in the league. This means he would be able to sign a new contract for $17,733,450 next summer (105 percent of his previous salary most likely will be higher than the seven- to nine-year maximum). For Bynum, a five-year contract starting at this amount would total slightly less than $102 million.

But what if Bynum becomes a free agent in 2015, when he has 10 years in the league? He will be better off financially if he can sign for more than $20.393 million that season, which would happen if the maximum salary for a player with 10 or more years in the league rises by at least 2.2 percent per year between now and then -- which seems like a safe bet.

This means one possible strategy for Bynum would be to sign an extension now, adding the full three years to his contract but including a player option in 2015. He could then opt out that summer and re-sign as a free agent with 10 years in the league. If the maximum salaries rise 4.5 percent between now and then (matching the league's revenue projections) he will earn an additional $5.2 million in 2015-16 through 2017-18 -- certainly nothing to sneeze at.

So while maximum salaries will not weigh into Howard's decision, Bynum could be better off signing an extension now in order to become a free agent when he has 10 years in the league.

3. Career earnings
The theory is a player will have greater career earnings if he signs his last maximum contract at the highest possible age. For example, a 31-year-old is more likely to command a five-year contract than a 35-year-old.

The factor here is the over-36 rule, which limits teams' ability to sign older players to lengthy contracts. The machinations of this rule are complex, but it all boils down to this: A 31-year-old player can sign a full, five-year contract, but a 32-year-old (or older) player can't. Both Howard and Bynum potentially will increase their career earnings if they time their contracts so they become free agents at age 31.
Dwight Howard and Andrew Bynum
Stephen Dunn/Getty ImagesHoward and Bynum's financial futures are somewhat tied together.

Howard is 26 now, and will be 27 when he becomes a free agent next July. If he signs a five-year contract next summer with an option at the end of the fourth season, he will have the ability to become a free agent again at age 31 -- right at the perfect time.

However, Bynum would need to sign a six-year contract to become a free agent again at age 31, which is not allowed. In order to become a free agent again at the right time, he needs to sign two contracts, or a contract and an extension. Again, if Bynum signs an extension now and includes a player option in 2015, he could opt out that summer and re-sign as a free agent. In addition to re-signing as a 10-year veteran, a five-year contract with a player option would allow him to become a free agent again at age 31.

4. New CBA
The fourth factor to consider is the collective bargaining agreement. It runs through the 2020-21 season, but either side may opt out in 2017 and re-open negotiations. This means there could be a different set of rules in effect starting with the 2017-18 season. Both Howard and Bynum may be safer if they sign new contracts in 2016, rather than waiting until there is a new -- and potentially less favorable -- collective bargaining agreement.

Bynum's aforementioned strategy of signing an extension with a player option works in his favor. If it looks like either side will opt out of the agreement, he could play out his option year in 2015-16, sign a new contract in 2016 and not have to become a free agent again until 2021.

Howard's situation is more difficult -- he would have to sign for one season fewer in order to become a free agent in 2016, or he could follow in Bynum's footsteps by signing an extension now. In either scenario he would be risking money for the sake of a hypothetical situation where a less-favorable collective bargaining agreement awaits.

Bottom line for Bynum: Should he be involved in a blockbuster deal for Howard this summer, his new team would have to accept him as a potential rental. But they can rest somewhat easier knowing it is in his best interest to sign an extension before he becomes a free agent next July. However, if the Lakers extend Bynum in the near future, he will be off the market until close to the trade deadline.

Bottom line for Howard: Howard has indicated that he would re-sign in Los Angeles next summer, so they should trade for him now and negotiate a new contract with him next July.

Despite the Magic's recent grumbling about waiting to deal Howard, it's clearly in their best interest to trade Howard now and start the 2012-13 season without the circus that followed them last season and this offseason.


http://insider.espn.go.com/nba/story/_/id/8214165/nba-salary-strategies-dwight-howard-andrew-bynum

#2 Roidz

Roidz

    Rookie

  • 1,249 posts
  • Joined: Dec 08, 2011
  • Location:Utah
  • Name:Ryan
  • Fan Since:1996
  • Fav. Laker:KB, L.O., Dwight, Glen Rice

Posted July 30, 2012 - 12:41 PM

Woah, my head hurts after reading that.

"What I'm doing right now, I'm chasing perfection." -Kobe Bean Bryant

Posted Image


#3 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,100 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted July 30, 2012 - 12:52 PM

LA better not give Bynum an extension
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#4 Basketball Reasons

Basketball Reasons

    There's no I in team, but there is in win

  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2009
  • Name:Drew
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:02 PM

LA better not give Bynum an extension


Why? Bynum on a 3 year extension is much cheaper and safer for LA than a 5 year max contract in free agency. Which is exactly why he won't be extending barring a miracle
Follow me @BallReasons

#5 Makaveli

Makaveli

    where will i go?

  • 13,312 posts
  • Joined: Jan 27, 2009
  • Location:Estonia.
  • Fan Since:'06
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe 'Bean' Bryant.

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:06 PM

Why? Bynum on a 3 year extension is much cheaper and safer for LA than a 5 year max contract in free agency. Which is exactly why he won't be extending barring a miracle

WHY should the Lakers give Bynum an extension since there's a bank in every city? Guy just doesn't give a damn whether he's on or off the court.

#6 Basketball Reasons

Basketball Reasons

    There's no I in team, but there is in win

  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2009
  • Name:Drew
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:14 PM

WHY should the Lakers give Bynum an extension since there's a bank in every city? Guy just doesn't give a damn whether he's on or off the court.


Because the Lakers aren't going to let the 24 year old and second best center in the league walk in free agency. The Lakers are best served on 3 yrs 60 million, Bynum will get the 5 years 100m as a free agent using his Bird Rights.
Follow me @BallReasons

#7 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,100 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:36 PM

WHY should the Lakers give Bynum an extension since there's a bank in every city? Guy just doesn't give a damn whether he's on or off the court.



^^This plus its just not worth it when we can get better production from multiple players if the $ is not all going to BYnum!
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#8 Basketball Reasons

Basketball Reasons

    There's no I in team, but there is in win

  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2009
  • Name:Drew
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:40 PM

^^This plus its just not worth it when we can get better production from multiple players if the $ is not all going to BYnum!


Unfortunately that isn't the case. Without even considering Andrew Bynum's salary next year, the Lakers are at $70,000,000. What does that mean? That means the Lakers are above the salary cap. Which, in turn, means they can only acquire players through free agency using exceptions (mid level, veterans minimum, and I believe they will have the bi-annual exception next season). Bynum off the books does NOT open the lane to acquire more talent, therefore makes -zero- sense for the Lakers to take that stance. Not re-signing Bynum next year would leave a gaping hole at center (and talent overall) that would likely results in Kobe and the gang without even a punchers chance to try and grab another ring before the Kobe era comes to an end.

Edited by Basketball Reasons, July 30, 2012 - 01:41 PM.

Follow me @BallReasons

#9 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,100 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:50 PM

Unfortunately that isn't the case. Without even considering Andrew Bynum's salary next year, the Lakers are at $70,000,000. What does that mean? That means the Lakers are above the salary cap. Which, in turn, means they can only acquire players through free agency using exceptions (mid level, veterans minimum, and I believe they will have the bi-annual exception next season). Bynum off the books does NOT open the lane to acquire more talent, therefore makes -zero- sense for the Lakers to take that stance. Not re-signing Bynum next year would leave a gaping hole at center (and talent overall) that would likely results in Kobe and the gang without even a punchers chance to try and grab another ring before the Kobe era comes to an end.


Bynum off books makes it easier to trade dead weight on team to improve meaning Pau, MWP, & Blake. 2 years Both Kobe & Pau come off books. Lakers do not need nor should they want to rebuild with Bynum as main guy on a roster with no Kobe & no Pau 3 years from now.
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#10 Disturbed

Disturbed

    Rookie

  • 321 posts
  • Joined: Jul 01, 2011
  • Fan Since:1968
  • Fav. Laker:Magic

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:57 PM

All I know is these guy's make a ton of money.....Just think Gasol is at the 20 million mark....
NEARLY ALL MEN CAN STAND ADVERISTY, BUT IF YOU WANT TO TEST A MAN'S CHARACTER, GIVE HIM POWER.
Abraham Lincoln

#11 Basketball Reasons

Basketball Reasons

    There's no I in team, but there is in win

  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2009
  • Name:Drew
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted July 30, 2012 - 01:58 PM

Bynum off books makes it easier to trade dead weight on team to improve meaning Pau, MWP, & Blake. 2 years Both Kobe & Pau come off books. Lakers do not need nor should they want to rebuild with Bynum as main guy on a roster with no Kobe & no Pau 3 years from now.


How exactly does Bynum off the books make it easier to trade other pieces that aren't Andrew Bynum? Also, you'd rather watch Kobe without a chance at winning a title in potentially his last 2 years in the NBA rather than at the very least have Andrew Bynum as a trade chip once Pau and Kobe come off the books?
Follow me @BallReasons

#12 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,100 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted July 30, 2012 - 02:03 PM

How exactly does Bynum off the books make it easier to trade other pieces that aren't Andrew Bynum? Also, you'd rather watch Kobe without a chance at winning a title in potentially his last 2 years in the NBA rather than at the very least have Andrew Bynum as a trade chip once Pau and Kobe come off the books?


Kobe has no chance at winning another ring with current roster and that includes NAsh & Jamison. We need Howard to get back into Title contentions period. the reason we cant ditch Pau now is because he is the safety net in case we finally do decide to part ways with Bynum. Paus last year in a contract will be easy to move. Im sorry Ive never been a Bynum fan = he is a an average role player not worth the $ nor the problems he creates within the team! he is never going to be a every day franchise type player = so dont over pay like we already did for BYnum once, Pau 2nd time around, Sasha, MWP, LO when he was supposed to be Pippen for Kobe when they were losing 1st rds in playoffs. Mitch always over values and over rates players actual production then over pays. Its not worth it look where we are now in Kobes final 3 seasons
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#13 Basketball Reasons

Basketball Reasons

    There's no I in team, but there is in win

  • 1,398 posts
  • Joined: Jul 04, 2009
  • Name:Drew
  • Fan Since:Birth
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted July 30, 2012 - 02:12 PM

Kobe has no chance at winning another ring with current roster and that includes NAsh & Jamison. We need Howard to get back into Title contentions period. the reason we cant ditch Pau now is because he is the safety net in case we finally do decide to part ways with Bynum. Paus last year in a contract will be easy to move. Im sorry Ive never been a Bynum fan = he is a an average role player not worth the $ nor the problems he creates within the team! he is never going to be a every day franchise type player = so dont over pay like we already did for BYnum once, Pau 2nd time around, Sasha, MWP, LO when he was supposed to be Pippen for Kobe when they were losing 1st rds in playoffs. Mitch always over values and over rates players actual production then over pays. Its not worth it look where we are now in Kobes final 3 seasons


So we can't trade Pau because we have Bynum, but you want to let Bynum walk as a free agent so we can trade Pau? The Lakers will not be in any better of a position if Bynum walks, that cap isn't going to put the Lakers under cap or any closer to being a contender, so I'm struggling to see the logic. He's 24 years old and hasn't reached his full potential yet, in a worse case scenario if Bynum's salary is such a hinderance to the Lakers once Kobe and Pau are off the books, they can move him. However, at that point the Lakers will have cleared enough cap to offer a max contract to add another top tier player to play alongside Bynum. Adding Nash and Jamison, and bringing back Jordan Hill, will definitely bring this Lakers squad closer to a title than last years squad. No question.

Edited by Basketball Reasons, July 30, 2012 - 02:17 PM.

Follow me @BallReasons

#14 gque24

gque24

    Sixth Man

  • 4,100 posts
  • Joined: Sep 03, 2009
  • Location:Sky High
  • Fan Since:1985
  • Fav. Laker:KOBE

Posted July 30, 2012 - 02:51 PM

If need be and we cant find any suitors for Bynum yes. Do I want to get nothing in return for Bynum of course not but I certainly dont want him as Laker when Kobe is gone. I dont care who they bring to come play alongside of him.

I understand your points Im just hating honestly cuz I cant stand Bynum. If he made $8 Mill at most $10 mill then I wouldnt have such a problem with him cuz the expectations would be lower
Never Wrong Always Right Like Freeway Exits!!

#15 Majesty

Majesty

    Grats on making the Raiderettes cuzzo!!

  • 35,850 posts
  • Joined: Dec 11, 2011
  • Name:Jay
  • Fan Since:1987
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe present, Magic past

Posted July 30, 2012 - 03:10 PM

WHY should the Lakers give Bynum an extension since there's a bank in every city? Guy just doesn't give a damn whether he's on or off the court.



it's funny you ignore him saying he WANTS to be a Laker which is more recent than "bank in every city" should we still hold up Kobe for "You'll never see me playing as a Laker again in this universe"??

Is Wayne Brady gonna have to Djokovic? - Robert Flores 





0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users