Steve Nash
#1
Posted July 05, 2012 - 02:05 PM
#2
Posted July 05, 2012 - 02:20 PM
#3
Posted July 05, 2012 - 02:27 PM
#4
Posted July 05, 2012 - 09:26 PM
That passing...
#5
Posted July 06, 2012 - 09:41 AM
#6
Posted July 07, 2012 - 07:07 PM
That passing...
Awesome
#7
Posted July 10, 2012 - 04:17 PM
#8
Posted July 11, 2012 - 07:17 PM
10Na[expletive]y?
#9
Posted October 13, 2012 - 09:25 PM
#10
Posted October 14, 2012 - 12:49 AM
A fake picture!
Get rid of Nash in number 13...
Its a bad omen
#11
Posted October 14, 2012 - 09:33 AM
#12
Posted November 15, 2012 - 04:14 PM
#13
Posted December 22, 2012 - 10:22 PM
If we can win against GS, being down 14 in the 4th, with Kobe going 16-41 and Dwight being out most of the game due to foul trouble i think we can start being a bit optimistic going forward.
#14
Posted December 23, 2012 - 12:01 AM
And Jack burned Meeks too. But when Kobe was on him he scored once.
But a lot of The Warriors success came from Dwight not being on the floor to alter shots and the fact that Pau was weak defensively on the likes of Klay and others.
Nash actually played some better defense than I've seen in a while tonight. Hit some nice clutch shots too
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#15
Posted December 23, 2012 - 12:13 AM
#16
Posted December 23, 2012 - 12:33 AM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#17
Posted December 23, 2012 - 10:45 AM
#18
Posted December 23, 2012 - 12:26 PM

#19
Posted December 23, 2012 - 07:25 PM
No offense, but I think it's at least time to update the original picture post of this thread with his real number.
I was gonna ask that too
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#20
Posted December 24, 2012 - 11:24 AM
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










