Idea: Lakers and Bucks
#1
Posted June 01, 2012 - 04:24 AM
Lakers get: Jennings, Ellis, Dunleavy, Udrih
Bucks get: Gasol, MWP, Eyenga + a future 1st round pick
Lakers Starters and backups:
PG: Jennings, Sessions
SG: Kobe, Ellis
SF: Barnes, Dunleavy
PF: Beasley?, Hill
C: Bynum, Hill
Ellis would be a great backup to Kobe.
Dunleavy is a good offensive player off the bench, which would add bench scoring.
If the Lakers sign Michael Beasley they could start him at PF.
If the Lakers did this trade and signed Beasley, this would be the best offensive team in the league.
#2
Posted June 01, 2012 - 04:42 AM
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7h895q6
Lakers get: Jennings, Ellis, Dunleavy, Udrih
Bucks get: Gasol, MWP, Eyenga + a future 1st round pick
Lakers Starters and backups:
PG: Jennings, Sessions
SG: Kobe, Ellis
SF: Barnes, Dunleavy
PF: Beasley?, Hill
C: Bynum, Hill
Ellis would be a great backup to Kobe.
Dunleavy is a good offensive player off the bench, which would add bench scoring.
If the Lakers sign Michael Beasley they could start him at PF.
If the Lakers did this trade and signed Beasley, this would be the best offensive team in the league.
But why on earth would Milwaukee do this??!!
#3
Posted June 01, 2012 - 07:03 AM
#5
Posted June 01, 2012 - 02:27 PM
http://espn.go.com/nba/tradeMachine?tradeId=7h895q6
Lakers get: Jennings, Ellis, Dunleavy, Udrih
Bucks get: Gasol, MWP, Eyenga + a future 1st round pick
Lakers Starters and backups:
PG: Jennings, Sessions
SG: Kobe, Ellis
SF: Barnes, Dunleavy
PF: Beasley?, Hill
C: Bynum, Hill
Ellis would be a great backup to Kobe.
Dunleavy is a good offensive player off the bench, which would add bench scoring.
If the Lakers sign Michael Beasley they could start him at PF.
If the Lakers did this trade and signed Beasley, this would be the best offensive team in the league.
No...no...and no... No way am I ever keeping Barnes over MWP.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#6
Posted June 25, 2012 - 06:56 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users











