lol thats because i never post lakers stuff here, i post that stuff at LG, but that site keeps crashing, so im venting over hereIve never seen you this pissed after a loss
RD2 GM4: Oklahoma City at LA Lakers
#1242
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:33 PM
#1243
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:34 PM
We'll be lucky to win 1 championship in the next decade the way we are built right now.
Not true. We will have a shot with Kobe one more time in the next 2 years, he'll retire in 2014 and then we'll sign Lebron James and compete for more titles
#1244
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:35 PM
#1245
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:35 PM
#1246
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:35 PM
I appreciate your contributions to the Lakers. You are a good person and I wish you well, but time to go! We need to move on.
#1247
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:35 PM
We could have traded Bynum for CP3. Bynum's value is higher than Pau and LO combined.Lol boston isn't trading rondo anymore. You don't trade a 15 and 15 player who controls tempo better than any player not named Chris paul
Mike D'Antoni
#1248
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:36 PM
.... then we'll sign Lebron James and compete for more titles
OH MY GOD, I couldn't watch another NBA for at least 5 years. Or at least until he'd retire.
#1249
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:36 PM
fixedGasol,
Edited by ツ , May 19, 2012 - 09:39 PM.
#1250
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:36 PM
#1251
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:36 PM
#1252
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:38 PM
Mike Brown has no answer for the Thunder fronting Bynum.
This says it all. Thunder have made an adjustment that Mike Brown has no answer for as of yet.
#1253
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:38 PM
#1254
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:38 PM
No Kobe got the ball early in the shot clock on almost all possesions. Maybe one was late out of 9 of his shots.Yes it was lmfao. Atleast 4 or 5.
Mike D'Antoni
#1255
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:39 PM
NBA comparing to the NFL.Makes perfect sense. That's the logic your using. So your saying your logic is faulty. Which is my point
never thought of thinking of it like that.
I'm confused.
as for saying you wouldn't have been mad if Pau missed, that's a lie. I woulda been pissed.

#1256
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:39 PM
#1257
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:39 PM
#1258
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:40 PM
Hope they play hard in Game 5 and hopefully they won't get blown out...sigh.
Do not count on it; when the Lakers lose a series, the clinching game is often bad:
In 1999, the Lakers lost to San Antonio 118-107
In 2003, the Lakers lost to San Antonio 110-82
In 2004, the Lakers lost to Detroit 100-87- this was after the Lakers closed on a 17-2 run
In 2006, the Lakers lost to Phoenix 121-90
In 2007, the Lakers lost to Phoenix 119-110
In 2008, the Lakers lost to Boston 131-92
In 2011, the Lakers lost to Dallas 122-86
#1259
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:42 PM
Before the series I would say yes but when you look at how we lost in game 2 and game 4 I am not so sure. Yes scoreboard says they are but when we had a 7 point lead in game 2 and a 13 point lead in the 4th in game 4 and lose.... These two teams are fairly even imo.Bottom line is, OKC is just a better team.
Mike D'Antoni
#1260
Posted May 19, 2012 - 09:42 PM
he's been passive all season.Pau can pass.. but that wasn't an attempt to pass the ball. He simply pussied out of the moment
we have to trade one or the other.
having 2 bigs creates mismatches but hinders flow. spacing.

1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users










