RD1 GM3: LA Lakers at Denver
#861
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:05 PM

#862
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:05 PM
#864
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:05 PM

#865
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#866
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#867
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#868
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#869
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
Nuggets: 6/16 3pt
Lakers out-rebounded by 9 (6 offensive)
Lakers had 9 turnovers more then the Nuggets
http://i41.tinypic.com/5v7qdj.jpg
#870
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM

#871
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#872
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:06 PM
#873
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:07 PM
Faried/McGee > Pau/Bynum
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#874
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:07 PM
1.Kobe having an Off Night
2.Javale Mcgee Playing Like a He an All Star
3.Pau Being Soft
4.Steve Blake being Steve Blake
5.Matt Barnes Missing shots
You are Bound to Lose
Ebanks got the Goudelock treatment 2nd Half
#875
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:07 PM
#876
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:07 PM
Barnes should have been in halfway through the 4th, Blake gave us nothing on either end of the floor.
#877
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:08 PM
#878
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:08 PM

#879
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:08 PM
DEN should be gone in 5 games. WE have to win next game tho

Props to fkMikeBrown
#880
Posted May 04, 2012 - 09:08 PM
But ultimately what I hated seeing was the 50/50 rebound opportunities missed by us, and Gasol deciding he wanted to be a jump shooter with the likes of McGee and Fareed on him. Not gonna get it done.
But all and all BARNES is the x-factor here. We can survive Blake not having a great shooting game because Sessions will still give us 10-11 a night or more.
But Barnes can NOT afford to have a game where he only gets 4 points, cause we have no Ron Artest out there to give us 15-18 points along with the defense.
If Barnes keeps laying eggs this series is gonna be a lot harder than it has to be cause we really have no 2nd option that's gonna get us 20 points and defense at the 3 spot unless we're moving Kobe there indefinitely.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








