Steve Blake
#101
Posted May 13, 2012 - 09:34 AM
Mike D'Antoni
#102
Posted May 13, 2012 - 10:29 AM
#103
Posted May 15, 2012 - 11:53 AM
Steve Blake is Clutch.
No.
#104
Posted May 15, 2012 - 12:40 PM
How did rap music go from really good to so dry?
Real artists get shelved and whack one's get famous
To leave masses brainless, a smart mind is dangerous
In their eyes there probably ain't no real [expletive] in your playlist
You're just a product of what the government has created
#105
Posted May 15, 2012 - 02:31 PM
#106
Posted May 15, 2012 - 02:39 PM
You are the same guy who would take Fisher over Blake.No.
Mike D'Antoni
#107
Posted May 15, 2012 - 04:57 PM
You are the same guy who would take Fisher over Blake.
Yeah, I would. I would rather have someone with five championships instead of someone who has barely been in a few playoffs. So yeah, I would. Not to mention that he is a great presence in the locker room, something the lakers have needed recently. I mean, look at the lack of energy that we saw in the denver series. I am not saying that he would fix the lack of energy, but he would be a great help. Just remember who it was that assembled the team for a meeting after a blow out win in the regular season. Fisher is not that great of a player, but neither is blake. Fisher can at least have a mental impact. You think you insult me when saying "same guy who would take Fisher over blake," but I just see at as a mark of your lack of knowledge.
Edited by free#0, May 15, 2012 - 05:00 PM.
#108
Posted May 15, 2012 - 05:38 PM
Nah you insulted yourself by choosing Fisher. Even Blake haters here wouldn't choose that. That puts you in a different category all together.Yeah, I would. I would rather have someone with five championships instead of someone who has barely been in a few playoffs. So yeah, I would. Not to mention that he is a great presence in the locker room, something the lakers have needed recently. I mean, look at the lack of energy that we saw in the denver series. I am not saying that he would fix the lack of energy, but he would be a great help. Just remember who it was that assembled the team for a meeting after a blow out win in the regular season. Fisher is not that great of a player, but neither is blake. Fisher can at least have a mental impact. You think you insult me when saying "same guy who would take Fisher over blake," but I just see at as a mark of your lack of knowledge.
Mike D'Antoni
#109
Posted May 15, 2012 - 07:02 PM
Nah you insulted yourself by choosing Fisher. Even Blake haters here wouldn't choose that. That puts you in a different category all together.
You know what, you're right. Blake is a good defender and he always gives us a lot of points off the bench. What was I thinking? Our bench would not be as great as it is without blake. I am so glad we have such a clutch performer in our team. I mean, it is not like fisher has ever been clutch.. right?
#110
Posted May 16, 2012 - 08:33 PM
Edited by Hollywood, May 16, 2012 - 08:34 PM.
#111
Posted August 10, 2012 - 01:31 PM
#112
Posted August 11, 2012 - 06:02 PM
#113
Posted August 11, 2012 - 06:04 PM
Blake sucks.
#114
Posted August 14, 2012 - 09:15 PM
salaries dont match an no way in hell the bobcats would ever take that.Steve + Duhon + Clark = Ramonster. Give the dude a second chance hehe. Really, Steve is gonna look sooooo bad with this team, i hope he gets traded, even i can not defend him now. Yes, i am a Steve Blake fan, i even follow him on twitter!
NBA CBA - http://www.nba.com/..../PDF/CBA101.pdf
#115
Posted August 15, 2012 - 02:24 PM
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#116
Posted August 15, 2012 - 06:38 PM
Edited by popo, August 15, 2012 - 06:39 PM.
Team Pau
Team Ron Ron
#117
Posted August 15, 2012 - 07:03 PM
Blake saved our hides in a lot of situations but his efforts are forgotten as quickly as props is given. He's a good player and he should thrive in the system this year. He's a good knock down 3 shooter and he'll get some good looks Last year defensively he was our best 2 on the bench, sad but true. But with Meeks that won't be an issue. He'll be pretty much only the bench 1 as he should be. He'll do fine this year.
#118
Posted August 15, 2012 - 07:27 PM
#119
Posted August 16, 2012 - 01:22 PM
#120
Posted August 17, 2012 - 12:39 PM

Lamar Odom 2005-2011
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










