LA Lakers at Sacramento
#101
Posted April 26, 2012 - 06:56 PM
#102
Posted April 26, 2012 - 06:56 PM
LOL
Kings announcers just said Blake is a good shooter
I'm guessing it was your nap time when he hit three big threes in the clutch against the Thunder
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#103
Posted April 26, 2012 - 06:57 PM
#104
Posted April 26, 2012 - 06:58 PM
#105
Posted April 26, 2012 - 06:59 PM
I'm guessing it was your nap time when he hit three big threes in the clutch against the Thunder
1 game = career?
This guy has not been a good shooter...
when you play 20 mins a night, and post back to back games with ZERO points, you are not a good shooter...
#106
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:00 PM
#107
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:00 PM
#108
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:01 PM
#109
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:02 PM
1 game = career?
This guy has not been a good shooter...
when you play 20 mins a night, and post back to back games with ZERO points, you are not a good shooter...
Not just one game, there's been many this season he's come through for us before. But you always ignore the good the players you hate do and pump up what the players you like do
Goudelock not looking good early but let's hope he picks it up.
Sessions REALLY needs to get out of his funk. Blake has outplayed Sessions for 4 straight games now. 3 of those he was injured so I think this Sacramento game is meant to be an attempt to get Sessions back into his groove. So I don't mind him playing.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#110
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:02 PM
#111
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:02 PM
Goudelock looks bad smh

Props to fkMikeBrown
#112
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:02 PM
#113
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:03 PM
McRoberts ballin.
Goudelock looks bad smh
When you are coming off an Achillies injury it is gonna take VERY long for you to really get back.
There's a REASON brown wasn't playing him. But no one wanted to listen
That's why I said forget about Goudelock this year he'll do great for us next year
Edited by Majesty, April 26, 2012 - 07:03 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#114
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:03 PM
sad
#115
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:04 PM
he better turn it on...Its goudelock vs Jimmer
#116
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:04 PM
#117
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:05 PM
dumbassgoude not playing well.
sad
#118
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:05 PM

Props to fkMikeBrown
#119
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:05 PM
How did rap music go from really good to so dry?
Real artists get shelved and whack one's get famous
To leave masses brainless, a smart mind is dangerous
In their eyes there probably ain't no real [expletive] in your playlist
You're just a product of what the government has created
#120
Posted April 26, 2012 - 07:06 PM
Still don't like his movement out there though. He's a lot more than a spot up three point shooter he'll play his best when he's able to be mobile and stop and pop, but that Achillies injury he's coming back from is gonna limit that.
Will be good to see if his handles and D have improved.
Edited by Majesty, April 26, 2012 - 07:07 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users










