The entire team did lol. Was not pretty at all offensively.I wasn't watching most of the 4th......did blake scrub it up or something
New Jersey at LA Lakers
#521
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:56 PM
#522
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:56 PM
6 rebounds....not really a close trip-double if you ask meSessions almost had a triple double.
#523
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:57 PM
Lose at home to the Nets? Different story
The entire team did lol. Was not pretty at all offensively.
kobe, pau, and ramon played well
#524
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:57 PM
#525
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:57 PM
6 rebounds....not really a close trip-double if you ask me
True. I stretched it a little. Give me a break.

#526
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:58 PM
We suck ass. This should have been a 20 point blow out win but we can't even convincingly handle the damn nets. We wont make it far like this.
True
#527
Posted April 03, 2012 - 08:59 PM
They have this superior complexity. They are so good (in their minds), that they can just coast and win the game easily. Unfortunately, that's a recipe for disaster.
Edited by KarlCalaguas12, April 03, 2012 - 09:01 PM.
#528
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:00 PM
I never heard that. I just heard Kobe say that josh doesn't want to take 3s anymore. figured it was in fear of benching.Jesus... Will everyone chill with everything players are saying being classified as a jab at Mike Brown? Lol.
Brown even said early in the season McRoberts was getting no playing time because he was hesitant to shoot.
glad josh isnt shooting 3s.

#529
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:02 PM
We suck ass. This should have been a 20 point blow out win but we can't even convincingly handle the damn nets. We wont make it far like this.
The Lakers teams in the past years have always done this. Maybe you don't remember. BUT obviously, those teams were better and this team is older and will have a tough time in the playoffs. But I just wanted to put it out there because some people act like the Lakers started losing leads this season.
Edited by J-H!zZl3, April 03, 2012 - 09:02 PM.

#530
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:02 PM
Cause that was shocking when the nets fouled kobe in those final seconds and WEREN'T out of fouls.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#531
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:02 PM
There's always been complacency with the Lakers. They never keep their foot on the pedal. It's annoying as eff but it is what it is. We got the W and played well without Bynum. Now onto the next game against the Clippers
![]()
RIP to the Greatest Owner in Sports, Dr. Jerry Buss
#532
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:04 PM
Sessions would have had 16 assists if Gasol had made his layups and probably 17 if Barnes didn't bounce it off his leg or lose it out of bounds
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#533
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:05 PM
#534
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:09 PM
and it will be
WE CAN'T EVEN BEAT THE NETS BY 40
LOL
LAKERS NO FAKERS
#535
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:10 PM
No criticism for Blake....no supriseGasol missed so many layups tonight, and Barnes had a bad game, couldn't nail his threes and couldn't finish at the basket.
Sessions would have had 16 assists if Gasol had made his layups and probably 17 if Barnes didn't bounce it off his leg or lose it out of bounds
#536
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:11 PM
Win by 30
lakers will be lucky if they score 30
#537
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:21 PM
No criticism for Blake....no suprise
Barnes 5 turnovers which references his inability to hold the ball.
And Pau missing a couple of layups I reference which can be seen with his 11-20, most of those 9 he missed were from point blank range, so they are referenced.
Criticize Blake?
Hmm... well he was the bench's leading scorer, he had 3 assists, he had 0 turnovers... um...he played decent defense on Deron Williams, and played Morrow pretty close for most of the times he was on him.... alright criticize him..
Ok he missed 4 shots?
Today was a pretty solid game for Blake actually and pretty much what I expect of him, played some alright defense against Williams and Morrow and knocked down a couple of threes. Not much to criticize.
Edited by Majesty, April 03, 2012 - 09:22 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#538
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:23 PM
#539
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:26 PM
#540
Posted April 03, 2012 - 09:30 PM
decent defense? he let williams come back and he had to be replaced by sessions asap. he plays no defense at all
Deron can light up any point guard, regardless of how well they defend.
![]()
RIP to the Greatest Owner in Sports, Dr. Jerry Buss
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








