LA Lakers at Minnesota
#461
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:44 PM
#462
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:45 PM
#463
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:48 PM
You mean the Clippers?!
no, like the Lakers that lead the league in Lobs(which they do) and are more substance than flash.
Once again
i was hoping for the best and expecting the lakers to go off on the timbs, but they took the night off instead so im off to go do something more productive then to stress about the lakers
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#464
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:51 PM
"Ability may get you to the top, but it takes character to keep you there" - John Wooden
#465
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:53 PM
From the 2nd quarter onward we played like the team I want us to play like. GIving up 33 points in the first quarter and having 21 it was a great comeback.
True. I liked how we played in the 4th quarter. The Blake,Barnes,Bynum and Gasol tandem played well to buy Kobe some minutes of rest. Kapono had good shots just missed them. Ball movement was there. I love how Blake plays the point.
#466
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:54 PM
Edited by serenityy, March 09, 2012 - 07:55 PM.
#467
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:55 PM
Great screen!! That made that drive happen, Kobe needs more of those. I say McRoberts has taken Murphy's spot and is a good replacement for when Pau is playing crappy or the Lakers need rebounding, better than Murphy anyway.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#468
Posted March 09, 2012 - 07:57 PM
Mean while the clippers bench is sitting on 48
Mo williams has 33 of that and has played near 34 minutes tonight , don't front like it's a controlled spread apart effort by the bench
Edited by Majesty, March 09, 2012 - 07:57 PM.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#469
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:00 PM
ill take any bench over ours
#470
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:01 PM
you have to stop advotaing our bench , our bench is a POS
ill take any bench over ours
It's just the annoying double standard of fans that try to take credit away from us when we beat Minnesota and they say "it was without K-love" but they give all the credit in the world to the Clippers for beating the Spurs when they are without Tony Parker
And I advertise our bench when they play well. And it ain't always points
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#471
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:04 PM
Mo williams has 33 of that and has played near 34 minutes tonight , don't front like it's a controlled spread apart effort by the bench
I'd kill to have someone who could put up 33 on our bench lol
#472
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:04 PM
Id kill if our bench even scored 33 a game!!!!
#473
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:06 PM
Id kill if our bench even scored 33 a game!!!!
#474
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:09 PM
Mo williams has 33 of that and has played near 34 minutes tonight , don't front like it's a controlled spread apart effort by the bench
My point exactly.
#475
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:10 PM
#476
Posted March 09, 2012 - 08:13 PM
mo Williams can drop 30 a game if we wants, you can give 100% of the shots to a bench player and they woudlnt even reach 15 pts
yep Clippers really won one over when they got him last year. That is why I felt the Clippers were gonna be a good team this year regardless on if they got Chris Paul or not when that rumor came up.
The reason they were so deadly was because they were 3 scoring PG's deep. THey had Chris Paul, Billups and Mo Williams, and that's a deadly 3 guard on ANY team.
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#477
Posted March 09, 2012 - 09:21 PM
#478
Posted March 09, 2012 - 09:29 PM
Why didn't goudelock play?
Mike Brown wanted to give Kapono a chance to prove he belonged. He failed and went 0-3
If we somehow land Dwight Howard AND Nash (which is one of the biggest reaches I've posted, don't think that will happen), then yeah...I have no problem with it, because Howard won't allow anyone to take Nash off the dribble 30+ minutes a game.
You should reach more often
#479
Posted March 09, 2012 - 09:34 PM
#480
Posted March 10, 2012 - 06:28 AM
Edited by Nak, March 10, 2012 - 06:29 AM.
Arguably the greatest franchise ever
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users








