Just an idea...
.Lakers send Odom & Blake to Orlando in return for Nelson & Anderson. We get pg & back-up pf, Orlando gets economical support in Odom for Howard & back-pg. If Howard still wants to be traded, we still have Bynum to trade and we also have Howards best friend in Nelson.
What do you think?
Idea: Jameer Nelson / Odom
Started by
magicman
, Oct 04 2011 10:09 AM
7 replies to this topic
#1
magicman
-
-
- 2 posts
Rookie
- Joined: Feb 04, 2011
- Fan Since:1970
- Fav. Laker:magic
Posted October 04, 2011 - 10:09 AM
#2
DanishLakerFan
-
-
- 1,925 posts
Off The Bench
- Joined: May 27, 2011
- Fan Since:1998
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted October 06, 2011 - 10:51 PM
I think we would be giving up one of our biggest strengths (the Odom - Bynum - Gasol trio), for Nelson who isn't nearly the player Odom is. Furthermore, we have trouble defending the PG position and I really don't Nelson is going to be the defensive stopper at the 1.
That being said, dealing Odom and Blake for a back-up big and a starting pg is exactly what should be done - just not Nelson and Anderson in my opinon.
That being said, dealing Odom and Blake for a back-up big and a starting pg is exactly what should be done - just not Nelson and Anderson in my opinon.
#3
Japago
-
-
- 3,509 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Aug 02, 2010
- Name:Pat
- Fan Since:1995
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted October 08, 2011 - 08:00 PM
I would consider it if the Lakers can unload both Blake and Walton.
#4
fedefox
-
-
- 5,879 posts
Guilty By Affiliation
- Joined: May 29, 2010
- Location:The gym
- Name:Federico Mauccione
- Fan Since:Since my father showed me a Lakers tape, when I was 4
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant - Derek Fisher
Posted October 21, 2011 - 02:06 PM
Jameer Nelson? Why? Trade the 6th man of the year for a PG that cannot shoot the ball or play decent deffense
"I don't like it when you call me Big Poppa, from South Central n' I hate helycopters"
I REP THAT WEST
#5
Japago
-
-
- 3,509 posts
Sixth Man
- Joined: Aug 02, 2010
- Name:Pat
- Fan Since:1995
- Fav. Laker:Kobe
Posted October 21, 2011 - 03:03 PM
Jameer Nelson? Why? Trade the 6th man of the year for a PG that cannot shoot the ball or play decent deffense
He shot well throughout the regular season. If the Lakers get 2010 playoffs Nelson, then it's really worth it. He was fantastic there. He can't play defense, but offense is a need too with Kobe, Pau and Ron not scoring as much as they were before. Even if Kobe and Pau can get it back up to that level, I think they would be helped out greatly by not needing to do that.
#6
GP1_KB24
-
-
- 20,198 posts
Dedication 4.
- Joined: Apr 10, 2009
- Fav. Laker:Kobe & Dwight.
Posted October 21, 2011 - 11:33 PM
No thank you. We definitely need a PG, but I wouldn't be willing to give up LO for Nelson.
5 Letters... 'YMCMB'
#7
ace™
-
-
- 9,309 posts
Most Interesting
- Joined: Aug 08, 2009
- Location:Gotham City
- Name:Heisenberg
- Fan Since:1997
- Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant
Posted October 24, 2011 - 10:11 AM
Jameer Nelson? Why? Trade the 6th man of the year for a PG that cannot shoot the ball or play decent deffense
I'm not for this trade, and I agree that he can't play D, but if there's one thing Jameer CAN do, it's shoot the ball from the perimeter.
#8
Cowboys&LakersFan
-
-
- 6,333 posts
Go Lakers!
- Joined: Jul 13, 2010
- Name:JD
- Fan Since:1999
- Fav. Laker:Kobe & Shaq
Posted November 02, 2011 - 05:09 PM
Horrible trade. Defense wins championships. Lamar is as good as Nelson offensively and way better defensively.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
