Japan Earthquake/Tsunami/Nuclear Disaster 10,000 + Deceased
#121
Posted March 12, 2011 - 09:16 PM

Props to fkMikeBrown
#122
Posted March 12, 2011 - 09:21 PM
Dang Kashima is now all swamped in waterhttp://www.abc.net.au/news/events/japan-quake-2011/beforeafter.htm
WOWWW
before and after pics
#123
Posted March 12, 2011 - 10:15 PM
"Many died of tragedy in the USA on 9.11.01 and on 3.10.11 Japan lost many as well... add the dates together & it equals 12.21.12"

Props to fkMikeBrown
#124
Posted March 12, 2011 - 11:49 PM
before and after pictures have me speechless...

#125
Posted March 13, 2011 - 12:40 AM

#127
Posted March 13, 2011 - 12:58 AM
Wow 9/11 plus 3/10 equals 12/21/12. That's prolly the craziest coinencedence Ive ever seen.
As RD says, It was on March 11.
March 11, we had the terrorist attacks here in Spain...
I think it's a good thing nothing has happened at the nuclear plant until now,at least explosion-wise...
#128
Posted March 13, 2011 - 05:39 AM
#130
Posted March 13, 2011 - 10:10 PM
12/21/12 is supposed to be...what?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_phenomenon
#131
Posted March 13, 2011 - 11:50 PM
The radioactive fallout could travel across the pacific and come to the west coast.
It is hard to sit back and take in the damage from the tsunami and the quake, while there is a developing nuclear situation on hand,
Edited by Real Deal, March 13, 2011 - 11:55 PM.
#132
Posted March 13, 2011 - 11:57 PM
I edited the word filter to include F-U-K if it's in a word. Sorry for that...didn't realize the filter was picking it up.http://www.prisonplanet.com/if-there-were-a-reactor-meltdown-or-major-leak-at-Fukushima-the-radioactive-cloud-would-likely-be-blown-out-towards-the-us-west-coast.html
The radioactive fallout could travel across the pacific and come to the west coast.
It is hard to sit back and take in the damage from the tsunami and the quake, while there is a developing nuclear situation on hand,
#133
Posted March 14, 2011 - 06:31 AM
Report: 2,000 bodies found in northeast Japan
(CNN) -- Approximately 2,000 bodies were found Monday in Miyagi Prefecture on Japan's northeast coast, the Kyodo news agency reported.
If confirmed, the discovery would be the largest yet of victims from last week's devastating earthquake and tsunami.
Roughly 1,000 bodies were found coming ashore on Miyagi's Ojika Peninsula, while another 1,000 were seen in the town of Minamisanriku, where some 10,000 people are unaccounted for, Kyodo reported.
Officials said earlier Monday that the official death toll from the disaster stands at 1,627, with more missing.
#134
Posted March 14, 2011 - 08:29 AM
this is what I was thinking the 1st day I heard about the reactor and possible meltdown.http://www.prisonplanet.com/if-there-were-a-reactor-meltdown-or-major-leak-at-Fukushima-the-radioactive-cloud-would-likely-be-blown-out-towards-the-us-west-coast.html
The radioactive fallout could travel across the pacific and come to the west coast.
It is hard to sit back and take in the damage from the tsunami and the quake, while there is a developing nuclear situation on hand,
Years ago I remember reading that millions of pounds of dust particles that contain segmented polution from China would fly over the Pacific each year to the Western US and then stop traveling west when it would hit the high elevation of the Rockies and settle along the western sea board.
It made the UN issue sanctions for China to trim their polution levels.
So if polution mass can travel from China then radioactive dust, clouds, rain, smoke, etc. could definetly make it to the US from Japan.
My understanding from my electrical engineering background is that low grade or higher grade Radium has no stable isotopes. So a actual atomic mass cant be given. But radiation specialists say most roentgens (measurable forms of radiation) can attach itself to mass that weighs less than .0001 grams (dust fragments).
And after the Chernobyl disaster in Ukraine/Russia health effects to humans and plant life were felt all over Europe including France, Germany, Sweden, Finland, Italy. Thats more than a 1500 mile spread. And mostly by river and elevated wind current. But that Chernobyl reactor was also operating at a low power volumn when it ruptured.
Japan to San Fransisco is about 5200 miles.
So its safe to say that any radiation amounts contracted wouldnt be severe or cause sickness except in extreme circumstances, like if someone was allready suffering from radiation poison. Unless the Japan reactor was operating at extensive power levels.......which I'm sure it wasnt when the quake hit and theres been adequate time to have the levels limited. But it probably never crossed even 10% of its total usuage threshold. I'd like to believe that anyway since japan has more than 50 nuclear plants in operation they wouldnt need to maximise.
Now as for Hawaii.....there alot closer. About 3200 miles. It all depends on the reactors power levels when ruptured I'm assuming. But they are further south and the wind doesnt travel in that direction usually. I think. Ive never heard of the "Westerlies" blowing south??
Edited by LakersGAFan, March 14, 2011 - 08:41 AM.
#135
Posted March 14, 2011 - 08:37 AM

Barely safe, I'm borderline on that light blue mark
#136
Posted March 14, 2011 - 08:54 AM
Any quakes we get our from the Mississippi (New Madrid) Fault line.
Nothing special. 1.0 - 2.5 maybe.
Biggest ever was in 1811 when a 7.7 but its epicenter was in Arkansaw. In GA in was like a 3.5 - 4.5.
But that was the nations largest quake ever as far as area is concerned. Its the quake that made the Mississippi River flow backwards for 3 days.
#137
Posted March 14, 2011 - 10:33 AM
Biggest ever was in 1811 when a 7.7 but its epicenter was in Arkansaw.
#138
Posted March 14, 2011 - 11:31 AM

#139
Posted March 14, 2011 - 01:55 PM
this is what I was thinking the 1st day I heard about the reactor and possible meltdown.
Years ago I remember reading that millions of pounds of dust particles that contain segmented polution from China would fly over the Pacific each year to the Western US and then stop traveling west when it would hit the high elevation of the Rockies and settle along the western sea board.
Japan to San Fransisco is about 5200 miles.
Now as for Hawaii.....there alot closer. About 3200 miles. It all depends on the reactors power levels when ruptured I'm assuming. But they are further south and the wind doesnt travel in that direction usually. I think. Ive never heard of the "Westerlies" blowing south??
Hawaii should be safely to the south of any fallout.
But, not the west coast.
It will travel across the Pacific at about 80-180 Knots per hour.

Japan to SF is 5200 miles.
1 knots = 1.15077945 mph
1 miles = 0.868976242 knots
5200 Miles = 4518.676
4520 knots / 80 knts per hour = 56.5 hours after the radioactive particles are in the air,
4520 knots / 180 knots per hour = 25.1 hours after the radioactive particles are in the air
That is a crude window
Some time on March 12th an explosion at the nuclear power plant.
There was a second, and bigger explosion
Also, 17 US Navy men have been effected with radiative material, from the ship sailing thru the steam that was released.
This is just part of it, and those particles are going to travel in the air across the ocean to the west coast.
The way i look at it, it is not a matter IF they will reach here, but, when and much..
And the situation is not getting anywhere near under control, it is getting worse by the day.
Radio active material from Japan will be falling on the US and Canadian West Coast this week.
There is no way to look at the long-term outlook, while there is still a current situation at hand.
#140
Posted March 14, 2011 - 09:20 PM
Damn, Florida looks like a pretty nice place to live, plus no taxes, shiiit!Are you guys safe from future earthquakes?
Barely safe, I'm borderline on that light blue mark
0 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users













