Jump to content




Apple Applies For Patent To Kill Jailbroken Devices


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Guest_Rico Suave_*

Guest_Rico Suave_*

Posted August 22, 2010 - 08:49 PM

http://news.cnet.com/8301-13579_3-20014356-37.html

Apple is apparently ramping up its battle to prevent iPhone and iPod owners from jailbreaking their devices.


The company has applied for a patent, titled "Systems and Methods for Identifying Unauthorized Users of an Electronic Device," that covers a series of security measures to automatically protect devices from thieves and other "unauthorized users." Unauthorized users apparently applies to those who engage in jailbreaking, which allows devices to run apps not approved by the company producing the operating system--such as Apple, the main target of such bypasses.

The application, which was filed in February 2009 and published Thursday, describes measures to identify "particular activities that may indicate suspicious behavior," so that "safety measures" can be taken to restrict the device's functions. Those activities include the "hacking, jailbreaking, unlocking, or removal of a SIM card," according to the application. Apple also intends to send warnings to owners via e-mail or text message when such activity is detected.

The application also describes a variety of measures that could be used to help identify the unauthorized user, including the activation of a camera that could capture and geotag the device's surroundings, and perhaps current user, and transmit that information to a remote device:

In some embodiments, an unauthorized user can be detected by comparing the identity of the current user to the identities of authorized users of the electronic device. For example, a photograph of the current user can be taken, a recording of the current user's voice can be recorded, the heartbeat of the current user can be recorded, or any combination of the above. The photograph, recording, or heartbeat can be compared, respectively, to a photograph, recording, or heartbeat of authorized users of the electronic device to determine whether they match. If they do not match, the current user can be detected as an unauthorized user.

When unauthorized use has been detected, "access to particular applications can be restricted, access to sensitive information can be restricted, sensitive information can be erased from the electronic device...," the application states, effectively wiping and bricking the device.
FULL ARTICLE inside link.

A LOT of people are not happy about this.

Posted Image

#2 Sako32

Sako32

    LIKE A ROLLING STONE

  • 1,217 posts
  • Joined: Jul 24, 2008
  • Location:North Hollywood, CA
  • Name:Sako
  • Fan Since:1998
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe, Shaq, & Bynum

Posted August 22, 2010 - 09:56 PM

[expletive].

Posted Image


#3 Windu

Windu

    Shatterpoint

  • 42,994 posts
  • Joined: Apr 24, 2009
  • Name:Will
  • Fan Since:1999
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe

Posted August 23, 2010 - 07:34 AM

people will find a way around it

Pau Gasol is GONE


#4 leor_77

leor_77

    Superstar

  • 8,338 posts
  • Joined: Nov 27, 2008

Posted August 23, 2010 - 12:16 PM

I thought Jail Breaking was recently found to be "legal."

#5 lakerswiz

lakerswiz

    Off The Bench

  • 2,578 posts
  • Joined: Jul 25, 2008
  • Location:Santa Maria, CA
  • Fav. Laker:Kobe Bryant

Posted August 23, 2010 - 12:21 PM

If I purchase something, I see myself being able to do whatever I want to it. If it ever crosses over into stealing data in a way or using free service, then I'd have an issue with it. But if I buy an iPhone and someone has created an app that lets me make my own ringtones or something that Apple doesn't offer upfront, then I should damn well be able to render the device I've paid for to make it work.




1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users