Hot Girls Thread
#61
Posted July 08, 2010 - 11:55 AM
That's one of the BIGGEST reason why I get on TLN...besides the usual Lakers' news of course. I really appreciated TLN keeping it up all this time...but I guess it's for the children.
Sports and chicks go together like NFL and beer.
My suggestion is to at least take down or delete the "pronographic" posts. Ugh.

Yes, I need to update this banner...Let's go Lakers!!!
#62
Posted July 09, 2010 - 05:46 AM
I'll be talking to the staff, and we're going to take a vote. We'll all make a decision on what to allow, and what to prohibit, in a "Hot Girls" topic, and when I re-write our board guidelines, I will make it clear as day in those AND in the topic itself.
when will you be doing this?
#64
Posted July 10, 2010 - 05:32 AM
Still waiting for everyone to chime in.
Ok cool.
What was the big deal though? The rules (that you set forth) were followed and I was doing my best to check other's posts as well within the thread to make sure that "girls had a bottom on", "no strings in front", and etc to keep the thread open. It's not like anyone did anything to break any of the rules. When I posted girls with hand bras...they did have adequate size hands. lol
Truth be told, I'm not even sure what UKUGA was even referring to when he made that post of his. It couldn't have been about the Hot Girls Thread because of the reasons I just stated above.
edit
just remembed your first post. PM me
Edited by Windu, July 10, 2010 - 05:36 AM.
#65
Posted July 12, 2010 - 07:11 AM
Just one "NO" vote from the staff.
#67
Posted July 12, 2010 - 07:46 PM
#68
Posted July 14, 2010 - 10:40 AM
again, not here to complain since the rule doesn't really affect me, i just don't see it.

#70
Posted July 15, 2010 - 05:28 PM
#71
Posted July 19, 2010 - 01:02 PM
I'm so tired of people complaining about what other people do. This is a free country. We do have freedom of press and speech. If some chick doesn't like women being objectified than protest the women objectifying themselves, not the guys (or girls) who enjoy it. Just because you are prude (and/or ugly) does not mean everyone must share your opinion/beliefs. Don't give me anything about kids being on the site. Do you know how easy it is to find free PORN online? Kids who want to find smut will find it, no matter what the site is.
All you feminist (or those who just feel its offensive), how would you like if I said pictures of fully clothed women were offensive to me (not the case, but for the sake of argument), simply because that is my opinion; that we should flaunt our bodies, be proud of what God gave us. That may be illogical, but so is the stance that if something offends you that it should (or does) offend all and therefore should be banned. That's preferential and gender bias if you ask me. What makes those opinions more valid?
The NBA's true DYNASTY
61 years = 16 chips 31 Conf. titles 56 playoff appearances
#72
Posted July 19, 2010 - 05:30 PM
Mods/Admin- I'm a fairly new member, came to the site for months checking up on news/updates before i finally broke down to create a profile. Can't say I ever went into the hot girls thread (not that I'd be opposed, but I generally wanted to find out about FA rumors). But to be honest, if people don't like the hot girls thread, or pix in it. Then don't click on it.
I'm so tired of people complaining about what other people do. This is a free country. We do have freedom of press and speech. If some chick doesn't like women being objectified than protest the women objectifying themselves, not the guys (or girls) who enjoy it. Just because you are prude (and/or ugly) does not mean everyone must share your opinion/beliefs. Don't give me anything about kids being on the site. Do you know how easy it is to find free PORN online? Kids who want to find smut will find it, no matter what the site is.
All you feminist (or those who just feel its offensive), how would you like if I said pictures of fully clothed women were offensive to me (not the case, but for the sake of argument), simply because that is my opinion; that we should flaunt our bodies, be proud of what God gave us. That may be illogical, but so is the stance that if something offends you that it should (or does) offend all and therefore should be banned. That's preferential and gender bias if you ask me. What makes those opinions more valid?
its back open now
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users












